Advertisement

Research of Emission Evaluation Method for Heavy Duty Vehicle

  • Junhui XuEmail author
  • Bo Li
  • Yong Guo
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 929)

Abstract

With the increasingly supervision of emission for heavy duty vehicles, the Europe regulation and the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards require a real road emission test using portable emission measurement system (PEMS). This article aims at the evaluation method for real road emissions of heavy duty vehicles and compares the emission results evaluated from work based method, CO2 mass based method and NTE method. The results show that work based and CO2 mass based average moving window method usually covers more operation conditions of vehicle and engine than NTE method do. The results evaluated from work based method and CO2 mass based method shows proportional relationship of approximately one. The CO2 mass based method shows a more extensive applicability due to not using ECU data from OBD. Besides, depending on different type of tested vehicles, the evaluation results get worse when the window threshold reduced accordingly.

Keywords

PEMS Work based method CO2 mass based method NTE method Window threshold 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0208002).

References

  1. 1.
    Xu J, Li M, Xu D, Su M (2006) Study on portable emission measurement system. Tianjin AUTO (03):30–33Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ECE Regulation No. 49. Uniform provisions concerning the measures to be taken against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from compression-ignition engines and positive ignition engines for use in vehiclesGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    The European Commission. (EU) No 582/2011 (2011) Consolidated to Regulation (EU) No 64/2012 Heavy Duty Emissions-Euro VI[S], pp 95–96Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    DB11/965-2013 Limits and Measurement Method of Emissions from Heavy Duty Vehicle (PEMS Method)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Qin K, Gao J, Gao J, Xu J, Li M (2009) Integration and validation of an on-board emission measurement system for heavy-duty vehicles. Automot Eng (11):1081–1085Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weiss M, Bonnel P et al (2012) Will Euro 6 reduce the NOx emissions of new diesel cars? – Insights from on-road tests with Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS). Atmos Environ 62:657–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Annual report on the difference between the Actual and Declared fuel consumption (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guo X, Hu J, Bao X, Li Z, Wu Y, Yang H, Shuai S (2011) Study of on-board testing methods for in-use compliance of heavy-duty vehicles. J Environ Eng Technol (03):232–236Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang L, Zheng J, Yin S et al (2010) Development of non-road mobile source emission inventory for the pearl river delta region. Environ Sci 31(4):886–891Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang L, Zeng W, Zhang Y et al (2015) Establishment of emission inventory and spatial-temporal allocation model for air pollutant sources in the Pearl River Delta region. China Environ Sci 35(12):3521–3534Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.TianjinChina

Personalised recommendations