Advertisement

Two Solitudes, Two Cultures: Building and Burning Bridges in Peter Watts’s Novels

  • Michele Braun
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Global Science Fiction book series (SGSF)

Abstract

Peter Watts’s sf is rooted in the contestation of binary oppositions, such as those explored in Hugh MacLennan’s Two Solitudes (1945) and C. P Snow’s “The Two Cultures” (1959), suggesting that cultural binaries provide lenses through which one might understand how Watts’s characters build (and sometimes burn) bridges. This chapter surveys Watts’s major works, investigating how characters build or destroy bridges in the context of twenty-first-century biotechnology and the corporations that own those technologies, to determine how McLennan’s original treatise on the two solitudes can be understood in the context of dissolving national boundaries. Watts’s work recognizes the shift from the local to the global and updates the challenge of building bridges across two solitudes that span the globe rather than the Canadian landscape.

Keywords

Peter Watts Biotechnology Globalism Apocalyptic fiction Rifters trilogy Blindsight 

References

  1. Chalykoff, Lisa. 1998. “Overcoming the Two Solitudes of Canadian Literary Regionalism.” Studies in Canadian Literature 23 (1): 160–77.Google Scholar
  2. Eliot, T. S. [1925] 2015. “The Hollow Men.” The Poems of T.S. Eliot, Vol. 1, 79–84. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  3. Foucault, Michel. 1986. “Of Other Spaces.” Translated by Jay Miskowiec. Diacritics 16 (1) (Spring): 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Freedman, Carl. 2000. Critical Theory and Science Fiction. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gerson, Carole. 1998. “The Changing Contours of a National Literature.” College English 50 (8): 888–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glaz, Adam. 2014. “Rorschach, We Have a Problem! The Linguistics of First Contact in Watts’s Blindsight and Lem’s His Master’s Voice.” Science Fiction Studies 41 (2): 364–91.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, Peter. 2006. “Unravelling Foucault’s ‘Different Spaces’.” History of the Human Sciences 19 (4): 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2003. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. MacLennan, Hugh. 1945. Two Solitudes. Toronto: Collins.Google Scholar
  12. Snow, C. P. [1959] 1998. The Two Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Soja, Edward W. 1989. “Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory.” In Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory, 10–42. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Suvin, Darko. 1972. “On the Poetics of the Science Fiction Genre.” College English 34 (3): 372–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tuan, Yi-Fu. 1977. Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Tuck, Simon. 2005. “Era of Two Solitudes Remains, Frulla Says.” The Globe and Mail. October 3. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/era-of-two-solitudes-remains-frulla-says/article20426394/.
  17. Vacante, Jeffery. 2016. “The Decline of Hugh MacLennan.” University of Toronto Quarterly 85 (1): 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Watts, Peter. 1999. Starfish. New York: Tor.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2001. Maelstrom. New York: Tor.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2004. ßehemoth: ß-Max. New York: Tor.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2006. Blindsight. New York: Tor.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2014. Echopraxia. New York: Tor.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Braun
    • 1
  1. 1.Mount Royal UniversityCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations