Advertisement

Evaluation of a Turkish Company’s Progress Towards a CSR 2.0 Approach to Corporate Governance

  • Burcin HatipogluEmail author
  • Bengi Ertuna
  • Duygu Salman
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

This chapter evaluates a program displaying features of Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility (CSR 2.0) of a Turkish company specialized in beverage production, which decided to dedicate a large part of its CSR agenda to sustainable tourism. The programme was planned and implemented in collaboration with the Ministry of Culture and Tourism and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). We focus our analyses on the good corporate governance dimension of CSR 2.0, for which we evaluate the operationalization of a selection of indicators we put forward: the cross sector social partnerships, dynamic co-creation of value, leadership and transparency. The potential contribution of this programme to a selected set of the 2030 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is also being assessed. Empirical findings suggest that all selected indicators are complementary in achieving social value and contribute indeed to some key SDGs. The results also indicate the need to identify alternative operationalizations and additional indicators for good corporate governance of CSR 2.0, in different tourism contexts.

Keywords

Good governance Cross-sector social partnership Sustainable development goals Leadership Turkey 

References

  1. Agarwal, N., Gneiting, U., & Mhlanga, R. (2017). Raising the bar: Rethinking the role of business in the Sustainable Development Goals. Oxfam Discussion Papers. https://d1tn3vj7xz9fdh.cloudfront.net/s3fs-public/dp-raising-the-bar-business-sdgs-130217-en_0.pdf. Accessed May 19, 2017.
  2. Alvarado-Herrera, A., Bigne, E., & Aldas-Manzano, J. (2017). A scale for measuring consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility following the sustainable development paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2), 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anadolu Efes. (2015). Anadolu Efes Sustainability Report 2015. http://www.anadoluefes.com/index.php?gdil=in&gsayfa=sr&galtsayfa=rp&gicsayfa=2&gislem=&gbilgi=2016. Accessed December 15, 2016.
  4. Anadolu Efes (2017). Anadolu Efes sustainability policy. http://www.anadoluefes.com.tr/sustainability/sustainability-policy. Accessed on May 11, 2017.
  5. Austin, J. E., & Seitanidi, M. M. (2012). Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 929–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balaban, S., & Yıldırım, Z. (2016, November 15). CSR POLICIES of Anadolu Efes company. (B. Ertuna, D. S. Öztürk, & B. Hatipoglu, Interviewers)Google Scholar
  7. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Content Analysis. In A. Bryman & E. Bell (Eds.), Business research methods (pp. 297–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. BSDC (Business and Sustainable Development Commission) (2017). Better business, better world. http://report.businesscommission.org. Accessed November 17, 2017.
  9. Coles, T., Fenclova, E., & Dinan, C. (2013). Tourism and corporate social responsibility: A critical review and research agenda. Tourism Management Perspectives, 6, 122–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dentoni, D., Bitzer, V., & Pascucci, S. (2016). Cross-sector partnerships and the co-creation of dynamic capabilities for stakeholder orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Future is in Tourism. (2017). Proje Teklif Çağrısı Başvuru Rehberi (Project Application Guide). http://www.gelecekturizmde.com/. Accessed September 21, 2017.
  12. Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray, B., & Stites, J. (2013). Sustainability through partnerships: Capitalizing on collaboration. http://nbs.net/knowledge. Accessed 5 January 2017): Network for Business Sustainability.
  14. Grayson, D., & Nelson, J. (2013). Corporate responsibility coalitions: The past, present and future of alliances for sustainable capitalism. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Husted, B. (2003). Governance choices for corporate social responsibility: to contribute, collaborate or internalize? Long Range Planning, 36(5), 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Husted, B. W., & Sousa-Filho, d. (2017). The impact of sustainability governance, country stakeholder orientation, and country risk on environmental, social, and governance performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 93–102Google Scholar
  17. Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(1), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jamali, D., & Carroll, A. (2017). Capturing advances in CSR: Developed versus developing country perspectives. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(4), 321–325.Google Scholar
  19. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Throusand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ministry of Culture and Tourism. (2007). Tourism strategy of Turkey, 2023. Ankara: T.R. Ministry of Culture and Tourism.Google Scholar
  22. Patton, M. E. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (Vol. 4th). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sustainable Development Goals Fund. (2015). Business and the United Nations: Working together towards the sustainable development goals: A framework for action. http://www.sdgfund.org/sites/default/files/business-and-un/SDGF_BFP_HKSCSRI_Bu. Accessed May 19, 2017.
  25. The International Business Awards. (2017, October 20). http://stevieawards.com/iba/company-organization-awards-winners-1. Accessed September 21, 2017.
  26. Torres-Rahman, Z., Baxter, G., Rivera, A., & Nelson, J. (2015). Business and the United Nations: Working together towards the sustainable development goals; A framework for action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School CSR Initiative and Inspiris Limited.Google Scholar
  27. UNDP Turkey. (2017). Our focus: Inclusive and sustainable growth. http://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/en/home/inclusive-and-sustainable-growth.html. Accessed May 11, 2017.
  28. UNEP Secretariat. (2017). The ten year framework of programmes on sustainable consumption and production. http://www.oneplanetnetwork.org/sites/default/files/10yfp_general_brochure_february_2017-.pdf Accessed February 10, 2018.
  29. United Nations. (2015). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. Accessed January 12, 2018.
  30. United Nations. (2016). Sustainable development goals. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals. Accessed March 10, 2017.
  31. UNWTO. (2015). Tourism and sustainable development goals. https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/book/10.18111/9789284417254. Accessed March 10, 2017.
  32. Visser, W. (2010a). The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of business. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 5(3), 7–24.Google Scholar
  33. Visser, W. (2010b). The evolution and revolution of corporate social responsibility. In M. Pohl & N. Tolhurst (Eds.), Responsible business: How to manage a CSR strategy successfully (pp. 311–328). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Tourism AdministrationBogazici UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations