Advertisement

Introduction: The Path of Analytical Realism

  • Pierluigi Chiassoni
Chapter
Part of the Law and Philosophy Library book series (LAPS, volume 128)

Abstract

The chapter purports to provide in turn: (1) an account of the basic claims characterizing “realism” and “scepticism” in the philosophy of law; (2) an overview of the contents of the book; (3) an account of a few alternative ways of conceiving conceptual analysis, where a modest and reconstructive variety is put forth as worthwhile pursuing in jurisprudential enquiries.

References

  1. Austin JL (1956–1957 [1961]) A plea for excuses. In: Austin JL (ed) Philosophical papers. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 123–152Google Scholar
  2. Barberis M (2016) For a truly realistic theory of law. Revus J Const Theory Philos Law 29:7–14Google Scholar
  3. Bix B (2007) Joseph Raz and conceptual analysis. APA Newsl 6(2):1–7Google Scholar
  4. Borges JL (1964 [1969]) El instante. In: Borges JL (ed) Elogio de la sombra. Emece, Buenos Aires, 1996Google Scholar
  5. Bulygin E (1966 [2015]) Judicial decisions and the creation of law. In: Bernal C, Huerta C, Mazzarese T, Moreso JJ, Navarro PE, Paulson SL (eds) Essays in legal philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 75–87.Google Scholar
  6. Bulygin E (1991 [1994]) On Legal Interpretation. In: Koch H-J, Neumann U (eds) Praktische Vernunft und Rechtsanwendung / Legal system and practical reason, ARSP-Beiheft 53. Franz Steiner, Stuttgart, pp 11–22Google Scholar
  7. Carnap R (1950 [1956]) Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. In: Carnap R (ed) Meaning and necessity. A study in semantics and modal logic, Enlarged edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 205–221Google Scholar
  8. Carnap R (1963) Intellectual autobiography. In: Schilpp PA (ed) The philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, La Salle, Ill. Cambridge University Press, Open Court / London, pp 1–84Google Scholar
  9. Carrió GR (1965) Notas sobre derecho y lenguaje. Abeledo-Perrot, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  10. Celano B (2016) Pre-conventions. A fragment of the background. Revus 1:2–16Google Scholar
  11. Chiassoni P (1998) L’interpretazione dei documenti normativi: Giustiniano e i Glossatori. In: Gianformaggio L, Jori M (eds) Scritti per Uberto Scarpelli. Giuffrè, Milano, pp 199–223Google Scholar
  12. Chiassoni P (2012) The model of ordinary analysis. In: Duarte d’Almeida L, Edwards J, Dolcetti A (eds) Reading H. L. A. Hart’s the concept of law. Hart, Oxford, pp 247–267Google Scholar
  13. Chiassoni P (2016a) Da Bentham a Kelsen. Sei capitoli per una storia della filosofia analitica del diritto. Giappichelli, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiassoni P (2016b) Supporting the force of law: a few complementary arguments against essentialist jurisprudence. In: Bezemek C, Ladavac N (eds) The force of law reaffirmed. Frederick Schauer meets the critics. Springer, Switzerland, pp 61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dagan H (2013) Reconstructing American legal realism and rethinking private law theory. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dagan H (2017) Contemporary legal realism. In: Sellers M, Kirste S (eds) Encyclopedia of the philosophy of law and social philosophy. Springer Science and Business Media B.VGoogle Scholar
  17. Dagan H (2018) The real legacy of American legal realism. Oxf J Legal Stud 38(1):123–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Endicott T (2002) Law and language. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, First published Thu Dec 5, 2002; substantive revision Fri Apr 15, 2016Google Scholar
  19. Ferrajoli L (1989) Diritto e ragione. Teoria del garantismo penale. Laterza, Roma-BariGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferrajoli L (2012 [2014]) El constitucionalismo entre principios y reglas. In: Ferrajoli L, Ruiz Manero J (eds) Un debate sobre principios constitucionales. Palestra, Lima, pp 173–234Google Scholar
  21. Ferrer J, Ratti GB (eds) (2010) El realismo jurídico genovés, Madrid-Barcelona-Buenos Aires, 2011Google Scholar
  22. Frank J (1930) Law and the modern mind. Stevens & Sons, VI Printing, London, p 1949Google Scholar
  23. Frank J (1949a) Courts on trial. Myth and reality in American justice. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  24. Guastini R (2011a) Interpretare e argomentare. Giuffrè, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  25. Guastini R (2015) A realistic view on law and legal cognition. Revus J Const Theory Philos Law 27:45–54Google Scholar
  26. Hart HLA (1961) The concept of law. Third edition, with a Postscript edited by PA Bulloch and J Raz, And with an introduction and notes by L. Green. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013Google Scholar
  27. Hart HLA (1977 [1983]) American jurisprudence through English Eyes: the Nightmare and the Noble Dream. In: Hart HLA (ed) Essays in jurisprudence and philosophy. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 123–143Google Scholar
  28. Himma KE (2007) Reconsidering a Dogma: conceptual analysis, the naturalistic turn, and legal philosophy. In: Freeman MDA, Harrison R (eds) Law and philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson F (1998) From metaphysics to ethics: a defence of conceptual analysis. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Himma KE (2015) Conceptual jurisprudence. An introduction to conceptual analysis and methodology in legal theory. “Revus” 26:65–92Google Scholar
  31. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking, fast and slow. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Kelsen H (1960) Reine Rechtslehre, 2nd edn. Deuticke Wien [eng. tr. The pure theory of law. The University of California Press, Berkeley, and Los Angeles, 1967]Google Scholar
  33. Leiter B (2007) Naturalizing jurisprudence. Essays on American legal realism and naturalism in legal philosophy. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leiter B (2008) Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Three Approaches. The University of Chicago Law School, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper n. 246, http://www.law.uchicago.edu/academics/publiclaw/index.html
  35. Leiter B (2012) Naturalism in Legal Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lawphil-naturalism/
  36. Leiter B (2013) Legal realisms, old and new. Valparaiso Univ Law Rev 47:949–963Google Scholar
  37. Marmor A (2005) Interpretation and legal theory, 2nd edn. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  38. Marmor A (2012) Farewell to conceptual analysis (in Jurisprudence). University of Southern California Law School, Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071, USC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-2, 1-26Google Scholar
  39. McCann M (2016) Preface to the new legal realism volumes I and II. In: Mertz E, Macaulay S, Mitchell TW (eds) The new legal realism. Volume I. Translating law-and-society for today’s legal practice. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp xiii–xxiGoogle Scholar
  40. Mertz E (2016) Introduction. New legal realism: law and social science in the New Millennium. In: Mertz E, Macaulay S, Mitchell TW (eds) The new legal realism. Volume I. Translating law-and-society for today’s legal practice. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  41. Moreso JJ (1997a) La indeterminación del derecho y la interpretación de la Constitución. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, Madrid [Eng. Tr. Legal indeterminacy and constitutional interpretation. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998]Google Scholar
  42. Moreso JJ (1997b) Significado, interpretación y proposiciones normativas. Apunte para un debate. Unpublished presentation at the “Jurisprudence Workshop”, Dipartimento di Cultura Giuridica “Giovanni Tarello” (Genoa, December 15, 1997)Google Scholar
  43. Spaak T (2015) Realism about the nature of law. Ratio Juris 30:75–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Quine WVO (1960) Word and object. The M.I.T. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Quine WVO (1969) Ontological relativity and other essays. Columbia University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Quine WVO (1975 [1981]) Five milestones of empiricism. In: Quine WV (ed) Theories and things. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 67–72Google Scholar
  47. Quine WVO (1992) Pursuit of truth, Revised edn. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Ross A (1958) On law and justice. Stevens & Sons, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Schauer F (2013) Legal realism untamed. Tex Law Rev 82:749–780Google Scholar
  50. Schauer F (2018) American legal realism. In: Sellers M, Kirste S (eds) Encyclopedia of the philosophy of law and social philosophy. Springer Science and Business Media B.VGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith Churchland P (2013) Foreword. In: Quine WVO (ed) Word and object, New Edition. The MIT Press, Boston, pp xi–xivGoogle Scholar
  52. Strawson PF (1959) Individuals. An essay in descriptive metaphysics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Strawson PF (1962) Analyse, Science et Métaphysique. In: La philosophie analytique. Les Éditions de Minuit, Paris”, pp 105–118Google Scholar
  54. Strawson PF (1985) Analyse et Métaphysique. Vrin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  55. Urmsom JO (1962 [1992]) The history of philosophical analysis. In: Rorty RM (ed) The linguistic turn. Essays on philosophical method. With two retrospective essays. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 294–301Google Scholar
  56. Wróblewski J (1992) In: Bankowski Z, MacCormick N (eds) The judicial application of law. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierluigi Chiassoni
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di GiurisprudenzaUniversità di GenovaGenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations