Advertisement

Integration Approach to Solving Problems of Interdisciplinary Nature in the Conditions of Post-industrial Education

  • A. P. SuhodimtsevaEmail author
  • N. I. Vorozheikina
  • J. B. Eremina
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 138)

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the problem of interdisciplinarity in modern school education. Interdisciplinarity is highly relevant to school system in educating a personality with creative and critical thinking capable of taking major responsible decisions in the conditions of post-industrial society and increasing professional competitiveness in the local and global labour markets. This article presents the results of the study of the theoretical (terminological) and practical aspects of Interdisciplinarity in the Russian and foreign scientific literature. The authors in this article do not concern the categorical differences between the terms «Interdisciplinarity» and «Intersubjectivity» and regard these terms as synonymous in the sense the terms «educational discipline» and «educational subject» are synonymous. Interdisciplinarity is considered to be a phenomenon of integrative processes in the modern school system. A number of practical decisions have been put forward. The authors have described the results of the pedagogical research project «The Renewal of the Contents of the General Education and the Teaching Methods in the Conditions of the Modern Information Environment» and have presented actual decisions to the problem stated: the elaboration of specialized didactic and methodological instruments in the form of students’ exercises of meta-subjective character, a specialized expert map, teachers’ instructions, Google-forms, functional supports. The scientific novelty of this article is concluded in the techniques and instruments which have been elaborated in the context of the commonality of methodology of educational activity. The article has provided the examples of the construction of the content of educational disciplines.

Keywords

Integration Interdisciplinarity Educational tasks Functional support materials School Methodological instruments 

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, A.: Cooperative learning effects on the classroom (2013). http://www.nmu.edu/education/sites/DrupalEducation/files/UserFiles/Adams_Anthony_MP.pdf. Accessed 03 May 2018
  2. 2.
    Aleksashkina, L.N., Vorozheikina, N.I., Lvova, S.I., et al.: The study of the history of formation and development of methodology and teaching techniques of general secondary education, vol. 1. Part 1 Education in the humanities in the period before the middle of the 20th century/edited by Ryzhakova, M.B., Moscow, St. Petersburg, p. 12 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beane, J.A.: Curriculum Integration: Designing the Core of Democratic Education. Teachers College Press, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellisario, K., Donovan, L.: Voices from the Field: Teachers’ Views on the Relevance of Arts Integration. Lesley University, Cambridge (2012). http://www.artsedsearch.org/summaries/voices-from-the-field-teachers%E2%80%99-views-on-the-relevance-of-arts-integration. Accessed 03 Mar 2018
  5. 5.
    Broersma, C.: Is it time to change? infusing the transdisciplinary approach into social work studies. J. Sociol. Soc. Work 2(2), 145–154 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bushkovskaya, E.A.: The phenonmenon of interdisciplinarity in foreign research works. J. Tomsk State Univ. 330, 152–155 (2010). TomskGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Holbrook, J.: Interdisciplinary education in science. In: Interdisciplinary Education - Challenge of 21st Century, pp. 9–14. Guidebook. Jagiellonian University. Kraków (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Instumental didactics: the prospective tools, environments and technologies of education/FGBNU «The Institute of the contents and teaching methods» of the Russian Academy of Education/edited Nazarova, T.S., p. 19. Nestor-History, Moscow, St. Pestersburg (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackson, A.W., Davis, G.A.: Turning Points 2000: Educating Adolescents in the 21st Century. Teachers College Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kleinberg, Eth.: Interdisciplinary studies at a Crossroads. Association of American Colleges and Universities (2008). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ790435.pdf. Accessed 03 May 2018
  12. 12.
    Klein, J.T.: Typologies of Interdisciplinarity: The Boundary Work of Definition. In: The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, 2nd edn. Edited by Frodeman, R., Klein, J.T., Pacheco, R.C.S. Oxford University Press (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mizherikov, V.: The Handbook on Pedagogy, pp. 124–125. Sphere, Moscow (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Novikov, A., Novikov, D.: The Methodology: The Handbook of the System of Main Terms and Definitions, p. 117. Librokom, Moscow (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Novikov, A.: The Foundation of Pedagogy, p. 11. Egves. Moscow (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Novikov, A.M.: Post-Industrial Education, p. 6. Egves, Moscow (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Slavin, R.E.: Instruction based on cooperative learning. In: Mayer, R.E., Alexander, P.A. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction. Routledge, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bakhtina, V.N.I., Zaporozhets, N.I., et al.: The disciplinary and interdisciplinary relationships in the teaching process of History. Edited by Kolosov, A.G., Moscow (1990)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ambartsumova, E.M., Gevurkova, E.A., Dukova, S.E., Koval, T.V., Lazebnikova, A.Yu., Likova, T.E., Romanova, M.Yu., Sinelnikov, I.Yu., Frantsuzova, O.A.: The manual of meta-subjective tasks: History, the Fundamentals of Social Sciences, Geography: forms 5–9. FGOS. RAO, Moscow (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    The State Educational Standards in the system of general education. The Theory and practice. Edited by Lednev, V.S., Nikandrov, N.D., Ryzhakov, M.B., of Moscow Psychological Social Institute, pp. 88–89.94. NPO «MODEK». Voronezh (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    The theoretical foundation of the contents of general secondary education/edited by Kraevskiy, V.V., Lerner, I.Ya., pp. 146–147, 152. Moscow (1983)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    The Federal State Educational Standard of General Education (2012). http://minobrnauki.rf/dokuments/336. Accessed 03 May 2018
  23. 23.
    Tsvetanov-Churakova, L.: Innovative aspects in the standards for the professional practice of teachers. CONFERENCE (25–26 November 2016), Improving the training and qualifications of teachers in modern education, pp. 136–145. Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vishnyakova, S.M.: Professional education: Glossary. Key definitions, terms, concise dictionary, p. 107. NMTS, SPO, Moscow (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vorozheikina, N.I.: School educational programmes on History (1989–2012): the development trends. The teaching of History and the Fundamentals of Social Sciences at school. 5, pp. 53–54 (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zagvyazinskiy, V., Zakirova, A., Strokova, T.: The pedagogical glossary, p. 19. Academy, Moscow (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zveryev, I.D., Maksimova, V.A.: Interdisciplinary relationships in modern school, p. 45. Moscow (1981)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. P. Suhodimtseva
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. I. Vorozheikina
    • 1
  • J. B. Eremina
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for the Development Strategy of Education of the Russian Academy of EducationMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Moscow International AcademyMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations