Advertisement

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze social forecasting methods using ideas that stand in as determinants of social development of civilization. An attempt is made to explain how an image of ideal future is modeled in terms of values and ideals of social order. Potentiality and necessity of a change in the future and aspirations for an optimal social order are seen as a major focus of futures studies. Evolution of social ideals and ways to recognize patterns in history prediction are considered.

Content of values in the composition of social ideal was identified. Research into the structure of social ideal, anticipated dynamics and stages of externalization of ideal was made. We emphasize the role and significance of creative consciousness evolution in a complex and multi-aspect process of advancement of the future of civilization.

In this context, a number of domestic and foreign conceptions providing insights into the risks of global civilization (based on a classification as a tool of scientific inquiry) are analyzed consistent with the strategies and tactics of civilization future prediction. We also pay attention to the issues of integration and differentiation of global processes, and to recognition of real danger to the humans to survive as a species on Earth.

Keywords

Values Ideals as prediction tools Future of civilization Modeling Global issues Futures studies 

References

  1. 1.
    Aristotle: Metaphysics, Feniks, Rostov-on-Don, pp. 137–139 (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergson, A.: Creative Evolution. Moscow: TERRA – Knizhny Klub. Kanon-Press-C., pp. 254–255 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weber, M.: Selected Works, p. 349. Progress, Moscow (1990)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gorsky, A.K., Setnitsky, N.A.: Spiritual renewal library in 20 vol., pp. 300–322. Raritet, Moscow (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davidovich, I.E.: Theory of ideals, Rostov-on-Don, p. 25 (1983)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Losski, O.N.: God and Cosmic Evil, p. 281. Respublika, Moscow (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rickert, H.: The boundaries of scientific concept building, Nauka, Saint Petersburg, pp. 426–427 (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Turchin, A.V., Batin, M.A.: Futures studies, 21st century: immortality or global catastrophe? BINOM Laboratoria znaniy, Moscow, p. 87 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Sovetskaya Entsiklopedia, Moscow, pp. 196, 459 (1962)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fukuyama, F.: Our Posthuman Future. Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, p. 147. Lyuks, Moscow (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Habermas, J.: Theory of communicative action, analysis thereof. On lectures delivered by J. Habermas in Moscow and on basic concepts of his teaching, Academia, Moscow, p. 8 (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chaadaev, P.Y.: Selected Works and Letters, pp. 31, 80. Pravda, Moscow (1991)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chumakov, A.N.: Philosophy of Global Problems. Znanie, Moscow (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scheler, M.: Selected works, Moscow: Gnosis, L. Chukhina, Afterword “Man and his value-based world in phenomenological philosophy of Max Scheler”, pp. 282, 388–389 (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jung, G.J.: Psychological Types, p. 21. Harvest, Minsk (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Far Eastern State Transport University LineKhabarovskRussia

Personalised recommendations