Advertisement

What Does Exploration Look Like? Painting a Picture of Learning Pathways Using Learning Analytics

  • José A. Ruipérez-ValienteEmail author
  • Louisa Rosenheck
  • Yoon Jeon Kim
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Game-Based Learning book series (AGBL)

Abstract

Game-based learning is becoming one of the major trends in education as it brings together numerous benefits. However, due to the open-ended and less linear nature of these environments, it is often complicated for instructors to really understand the learning process of students within a game. Learning analytics can play a meaningful role in transforming learning pathways in games into interpretable information for teachers. In this study, we propose three novel metrics that focus more on the learning process of students than on the outcomes. We apply these metrics to data from The Radix Endeavor, an inquiry-based learning game on STEM topics that has been tested in multiple schools across the US. We also report correlations between these metrics and in-game learning outcomes and discuss the importance and potential use of metrics to understand students’ learning processes.

Keywords

Game-based learning Learning analytics Behavioral modeling Learning pathways 

References

  1. Berland, M., Baker, R. S., & Blikstein, P. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics: Applications to constructionist research. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 205–220.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9223-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blikstein, P. (2011). Using learning analytics to assess students ’ behavior in open-ended programming tasks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 110–116).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2090116.2090132
  3. Calvo-Flores, M. D., Galindo, E. G., Jiménez, M. C. P., & Pineiro, O. P. (2006). Predicting students’ marks from Moodle logs using neural network models. Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education, 1(2), 586–590.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Killingsworth, S. S. (2016). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., Macarthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., & Joksimović, S. (2017). Piecing the learning analytics puzzle: A consolidated model of a field of research and practice. Learning: Research and Practice, 3(1), 63–78.Google Scholar
  8. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gibson, D., & Clarke-Midura, J. (2015). Some psychometric and design implications of game-based learning analytics. In E-learning systems, environments and approaches (pp. 247–261). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Honey, M. A., & Hilton, M. (2011). Learning science through computer games and simulations. Committee on science learning: Computer games, simulations, and education. Washington, DC: Board on Science Education, National Research Council, The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kloft, M., Stiehler, F., Zheng, Z., & Pinkwart, N. (2014). Predicting MOOC dropout over weeks using machine learning methods. In Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs (pp. 60–65). Retrieved from http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W/W14/W14-41.pdf#page=67
  12. Nghe, N. T., Janecek, P., & Haddawy, P. (2007). A comparative analysis of techniques for predicting academic performance. In 2007 37th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports. FIE’07. (p. T2G-7).Google Scholar
  13. Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pardos, Z. A., Gowda, S. M., Ryan, S. J. D., & Heffernan, N. T. (2010). Ensembling predictions of student post-test scores for an intelligent tutoring system. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 189–198).Google Scholar
  15. Prensky, M. (2006). Don’t bother me, Mom, I’m learning! How computer and video games are preparing your kids for 21st century success and how you can help! St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.Google Scholar
  16. Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2017). Detecting and clustering students by their gamification behavior with badges: A case study in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2–B), 816–830.Google Scholar
  17. Ruiperez-Valiente, J. A., Munoz-Merino, P. J., Delgado Kloos, C., Niemann, K., Scheffel, M., & Wolpers, M. (2016). Analyzing the impact of using optional activities in self-regulated learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(3), 231–243.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2016.2518172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Leony, D., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2015). ALAS-KA: A learning analytics extension for better understanding the learning process in the Khan Academy platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 47, 139–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Salehi, M., & Nakhai Kamalabadi, I. (2013). Hybrid recommendation approach for learning material based on sequential pattern of the accessed material and the learner’s preference tree. Knowledge-Based Systems, 48, 57–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.04.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Segedy, J. R., Kinnebrew, J. S., & Biswas, G. (2015). Using coherence analysis to characterize self-regulated learning behaviours in open-ended learning environments. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 13–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Serrano-Laguna, Á., Torrente, J., Moreno-Ger, P., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2012). Tracing a little for big improvements: Application of learning analytics and videogames for student assessment. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 203–209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Squire, K. (2011). Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. Technology, education—Connections (the TEC series). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  23. Takeuchi, L. M., & Vaala, S. (2014). Level up learning: A national survey on teaching with digital games. New York, NY: Joan Ganz Cooney Center.Google Scholar
  24. Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wouters, P., Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H., & Van Der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • José A. Ruipérez-Valiente
    • 1
    Email author
  • Louisa Rosenheck
    • 1
  • Yoon Jeon Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations