Designing Products for the Circular Economy

  • David J. TylerEmail author
  • Sara L.-C. Han


Until recent years, apparel product design was undertaken with very little reference to environmental sustainability. However, the legislative framework has increasingly constrained design decisions related to the use of hazardous chemicals, especially with the advent of REACH regulations within the EU. Most companies now recognise a large number of chemical substances that are prohibited in the dyeing and finishing of textiles. This dominates thinking about design for the environment. The increasing adoption of environmental management systems has expanded the vision for initiatives promoting sustainability, including those in laundering and care. Principles are recognised for product design and development that have led to more sustainable goods and services.

In some industries, regulations require producer to take responsibility for the disposal of products that companies release to the market. This obligation has triggered thinking about design for disassembly and design for disposal. This development has accelerated the adoption of circular economy concepts. The EU has not implemented producer responsibility in apparel, although some companies have voluntarily championed circular economy initiatives. However, the business models of most apparel companies have nothing to say about end-of-life issues.

This chapter is concerned with new product development processes that incorporate Design for Environment and Design for Disassembly and Design for Disposal. As there are numerous technical issues to address, a team-based product development process has many advantages, whereby garment designers work alongside specialists from other disciplines. This process requires culture change to be embraced by most brand owners and a departure from the practice of separating the design process from the product development process. In most cases, changes of this nature bring disruption to a globalised industrial sector.

Case studies that illustrate the concepts developed in this chapter will be considered. In particular, the French experience of adopting producer responsibility for apparel goods is considered. The accredited organisation ECO TLC exhibits strength in the promotion of sustainability projects, but there is a fundamental weakness in that culture change in the design process of brand owners is hard to discern.


Design Circular economy Sustainability Product development Apparel Textiles 


  1. Andrews, D. (2015). The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability. Local Economy, 30(3), 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhamra, T., Heeley, J., & Tyler, D. (1998). A cross-sectoral approach to new product development. The Design Journal, 1(3), 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bjørn, A., & Strandesen, M. (2011). The cradle to cradle concept – Is it always sustainable? Poster session presented at The Life Cycle Management (LCM) conference: Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management, Berlin, Germany. Retrieved September 2018, from
  4. Bocken, N. M. P., Olivetti, E. A., Cullen, J. M., Potting, J., & Lifset, R. (2017). Taking the circularity to the next level: A special issue on the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 476–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bukhari, M. A., Carrasco-Gallego, R., & Ponce-Cueto, E. (2018). Developing a national programme for textiles and clothing recovery. Waste Management & Research, 36(4), 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpet Recycling UK. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from
  7. Choi, T. (2017). Environmental impact of voluntary extended producer responsibility: The case of carpet recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connor-Crabb, A., Miller, K., & Chapman, J. (2016). Design strategies for the eternal reoccurrence of the new. Fashion Practice, 8(1), 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, T., Hill, H., Kininmonth, J., Townsend, K., Hughes, M., Knox, A., et al. (2013). Design for longevity: Guidance on increasing the active life of clothing. WRAP (Waste & Resources Action Programme), Banbury.Google Scholar
  10. de Man, R., & Friege, H. (2016). Circular economy: European policy on shaky ground. Waste Management & Research, 34(2), 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Defra. (2011). Environmental Protection Act (Summary). Retrieved September 2018, from
  12. Eco TLC. (2018a). Retrieved September 2018, from
  13. Eco TLC. (2018b). Roads to innovation 2018. Retrieved September 2018, from
  14. Elander, M., Tojo, N, Tekie, H., & Hennlock, M. (2017). Impact assessment of policies promoting fiber-to-fiber recycling of textiles. Vol. 2017:3, Mistra Future Fashion.Google Scholar
  15. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2014). Towards the circular economy: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved September 2018, from
  16. Esposito, M., Tse, T., & Soufani, K. (2018). Introducing a circular economy: New thinking with new managerial and policy implications. California Management Review, 60(3), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. European Commission. (2015, December 2). Closing the loop: Commission adopts ambitious new Circular Economy Package to boost competitiveness, create jobs and generate sustainable growth. Brussels. Retrieved September 2018, from
  18. European Commission. (2018a). REACH implementation. Retrieved September 2018, from
  19. European Commission. (2018b, May 22). Circular economy: New rules will make EU the global front-runner in waste management and recycling. Brussels. Retrieved from
  20. Franco, M. A. (2017). Circular economy at the micro level: A dynamic view of incumbents’ struggles and challenges in the textile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168(1), 833–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gardner, J. (2017). Carpet recycling UK – Recovering value from carpet fibres. Proceedings of the 6th International Fibre Recycling Symposium, Manchester, June 2017. Paper 18, 7 pages.Google Scholar
  22. Gereffi, G. (1999). International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 48(1), 37–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016, February). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gracey, F., & Moon, D. (2012). Valuing our clothes: The evidence base. Waste and Resources Action Programme.Google Scholar
  25. Gwilt, A. (2014). A practical guide to sustainable fashion. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heys, R. (2012). The Clean Air Act 1956. BMJ, 345, e5751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Long, E., Kokke, S., Lundie, D., Shaw, N., Ijomah, W., & Kao, C. (2016, December). Technical solutions to improve global sustainable management of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) in the EU and China. Journal of Remanufacturing, 6, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mugge, R., Schoormans, J. P. L., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2005). Design strategies to postpone consumers’ product replacement: The value of a strong person-product relationship. The Design Journal, 8(2), 38–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Niaga. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from
  31. Niinimäki, K. (2010). Eco-clothing, consumer identity and ideology. Sustainable Development, 18, 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Niinimäki, K. (Ed.). (2013). Sustainable fashion: New approaches. Helsinki: Aalto University.Google Scholar
  33. Our Common Future. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Retrieved September 2018, from
  34. Park, H., & Armstrong, C. M. J. (2017). Collaborative apparel consumption in the digital sharing economy: An agenda for academic inquiry. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(5), 465–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. R2π. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from
  36. re:newcell. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from
  37. Relooping Fashion Initiative. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from
  38. Resyntex. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from
  39. Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018). Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spangenberg, J. H., & Lorek, S. (2002). Environmentally sustainable household consumption: From aggregate environmental pressures to priority fields of action. Ecological Economics, 43(2–3), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trash-2-Cash. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from
  42. Tyler, D. J. (Ed.). (2008a). Carr & Latham’s technology of clothing manufacture (4th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Chapter 9.Google Scholar
  43. Tyler, D. (2008b). Advances in apparel product development. In C. Fairhurst (Ed.), Advances in apparel production (pp. 157–176). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tyler, D., & Hall, N. (2018, July 23–26). Eco-system services and the circular economy for textiles. The 91st Textile Institute World Conference, Leeds University, UK.Google Scholar
  45. Velis, C. (2018). No circular economy if current systemic failures are not addressed. Waste Management & Research, 36(9), 757–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang, H., Gu, Y., Li, L., Liu, T., Wu, Y., & Zuo, T. (2017). Operating models and development trends in the extended producer responsibility system for waste electrical and electronic equipment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 159–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Worn Again Technologies. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from
  48. WRAP. (2018). WRAP and the circular economy. Waste and Resources Action Programme. Retrieved September 2018, from
  49. Zane, D. M., Irwin, J. R., & Reczek, R. W. (2016). Do less ethical consumers denigrate more ethical consumers? The effect of willful ignorance on judgments of others. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(3), 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Fashion Institute, Manchester Metropolitan UniversityManchesterUK
  2. 2.School of Design, University of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations