Multilateral Negotiations

  • Andrea CaputoEmail author


This chapter continues the analysis of the literature on negotiation set out in the first chapter. What is the effect of a third-party entry in a negotiation initially configured as bilateral-distributive? Can the entry of third parties bring multilateral negotiation from distributive to integrative? In which way? To answer these questions, it is necessary to deepen the study of multilateral negotiations: we will start from the presentation of the thought of Sebenius (Negotiation Analysis: A Characterization and Review. Management Science, 38(1), 18–38, 1992) that identifies the possibility of modifying the number of parties as a strategic aspect of negotiation, then moving on to the theoretical discussion of multilateral negotiations, together with the presentation of some models and analysis tools useful for the negotiators who face them.


Multilateral negotiations Multi-party Literature review Integrative agreements Negotiation arithmetic 


  1. Cafferata, R. (2007). Direzione aziendale e organizzazione. Aracne.
  2. Caputo, A. (2012). Integrative Agreements in Multilateral Negotiations: The Case of Fiat and Chrysler. International Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 3(12), 167–180.Google Scholar
  3. Fisher, R. J., Ury, W., & Patton, B. M. (1981). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  4. Gatti, C. (2008). Le negoziazioni nel governo dell’impresa. Verso un modello di analisi. Padova: CEDAM.Google Scholar
  5. Komorita, S. S., & Kravitz, D. (1983). Coalition Formation: A Social Psychologica Approach. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic Group Processes. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Kramer, R. M. (1991). The More the Merrier? Social Psychological Aspects of Multiparty Negotiations in Organizations. In M. Bazerman, R. J. Lewicki, & B. H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations: Handbook of Negotiation Research. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D., & Barry, B. (2014). Negotiation (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. Mariani, M. (2002). Decidere e Negoziare: Concetti e Strumenti per l’Azione Manageriale. Milano: Il sole 24 ore.Google Scholar
  9. Murninghan, J. K., & Brass, D. (1991). Intraorganizational Coalitions. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  10. Polzer, J. T., Mannix, E. A., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Interest Alignment and Coalitions in Multiparty Negotiation. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 42–54.Google Scholar
  11. Pruitt, D. G. (1983). Achieving Integrative Agreements. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Raiffa, H. (1982). The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sebenius, J. K. (1992). Negotiation Analysis: A Characterization and Review. Management Science, 38(1), 18–38. Retrieved from Scholar
  14. Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Weiss, S. E. (1993). Analysis of Complex Negotiations in International Business: The RBC Perspective. Organization Science, 4(2), 269–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LincolnLincolnUK

Personalised recommendations