Advertisement

Social Semiotics: Setting the Scene

  • May Wong
Chapter

Abstract

Social semiotics is a social theory of meaning and communication modelled on Michael Halliday’s theories of language as social semiotic and Systemic Functional Grammar with a particular focus on the agency of social actors and social context. Chapter  1 provides a fully up-to-date introduction to the theory (while peculiar aspects of the theory will be dealt with in subsequent chapters when they become relevant for discussion and application to the data), and argues that social semiotics serves as a useful multidisciplinary framework for analysing text-image relations. With an aim to contributing to the existing monographs of empirical social semiotic analysis in the fields of education and humanities, this chapter argues for focussing the analytical lens on visual analysis in other major areas of impactful social research which could provide a nuanced view of semiotic resources and principles pertaining to visual imagery and text as the most prominent modes of communication in contemporary society before identifying and describing the resources and principles that operate within and across other modes.

Keywords

Social semiotics Theoretical background Semiotic artefacts Fields of application Benefits of visual analysis 

References

  1. Bateman, John. 2014. Text and image: A critical introduction to the visual/verbal divide. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bezemer, Jeff, and Gunther Kress. 2016. Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Böck, Margit, and Norbert Pachler, eds. 2013. Multimodality and social semiotics: Communication, meaning-making, and learning in the work of Gunther Kress. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bowcher, Wendy, ed. 2012. Multimodal texts from around the world: Cultural and linguistic insights. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Djonov, Emilia, and Sumin Zhao, eds. 2014. Critical multimodal studies of popular discourse. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Dreyfus, Shoshana, Susan Hood, and Maree Stenglin, eds. 2011. Semiotic margins: Meaning in multimodalities. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. Halliday, Michael. 1978. Language as social semiotics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  8. Halliday, Michael, and Christian Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  9. Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress. 1988. Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jewitt, Carey. 2009a. An introduction to multimodality. In The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, ed. Carey Jewitt, 14–27. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2009b. Different approaches to multimodality. In The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, ed. Carey Jewitt, 28–39. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Jewitt, Carey, Jeff Bezemer, and Kay O’Halloran. 2016. Introducing multimodality. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Jewitt, Carey, and Gunther Kress. 2003. Multimodal literacy. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  14. Jewitt, Carey, and Rumiko Oyama. 2001. Visual meaning: A social semiotic approach. In Handbook of visual analysis, ed. Theo van Leeuwen and Carey Jewitt, 134–156. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, Carys, and Eija Ventola, eds. 2008. From language to multimodality: New developments in the study of ideational meaning. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  16. Kress, Gunther. 1993. Against arbitrariness: The social production of the sign as a foundational issue in critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society 4 (2): 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2010. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2015. Semiotic work: Applied linguistics and a social semiotic account of multimodality. AILA Review 28 (1): 49–71.Google Scholar
  19. Kress, Gunther, and Robert Hodge. 1979. Language as ideology. London and Boston, MA: Routledge/Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  20. Kress, Gunther, Carey Jewitt, Jon Ogborn, and Charalampos Tsatsarelis. 2014. Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. 2nd ed. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  21. Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Michelson, Kristen, and José Aldemar Álvarez Valencia. 2016. Study abroad: Tourism or education? A multimodal social semiotic analysis of institutional discourses of a promotional website. Discourse and Communication 10 (3): 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Norris, Sigrid, ed. 2012. Multimodality in practice: Investigating theory-in-practice-through-methodology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. O’Halloran, Kay, ed. 2004. Multimodal discourse analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  27. O’Halloran, Kay, and Bradley Smith, eds. 2011. Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and domains. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Pauwels, Luc. 2011. An integrated conceptual framework for visual social research. In The SAGE handbook of visual research methods, ed. Eric Margolis and Luc Pauwels, 3–23. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 2012. A multimodal framework for analysing websites as cultural expressions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (3): 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Royce, Terry, and Wendy Bowcher, eds. 2007. New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Seizov, Ognyan, and Janina Wildfeuer, eds. 2017. New studies in multimodality: Conceptual and methodological elaborations. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  32. Teo, Peter. 2004. Ideological dissonances in Singapore’s National Campaign posters: A semiotic deconstruction. Visual Communication 3 (2): 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Thurlow, Crispin, and Giorgia Aiello. 2007. National pride, global capital: A social semiotic analysis of transnational visual branding in the airline industry. Visual Communication 6 (3): 305–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Unsworth, Len. 2001. Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  35. ———., ed. 2008. Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  36. van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing social semiotics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Ventola, Eija, Cassily Charles, and Martin Kaltenbacher, eds. 2004. Perspectives on multimodality. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  38. Ventola, Eija, and Arsenio Jesús Moya Guijarro, eds. 2009. The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Wignell, Peter, Sabine Tan, and Kay O’Halloran. 2017. Violent extremism and iconisation: Commanding good and forbidding evil? Critical Discourse Studies 14 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wildfeuer, Janina, ed. 2015. Building bridges for multimodal research: International perspectives on theories and practices in multimodal analysis. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  41. Wong, Wayne. 2016. Synthetic personalisation of Barack Obama at the 2008 US Democratic National Convention: A social semiotic multimodal analysis of a staged political context. Visual Communication 15 (4): 509–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zappavigna, Michele. 2016. Social media photography: Construing subjectivity in Instagram images. Visual Communication 15 (3): 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhao, Sumin, Emilia Djonov, Anders Björkvall, and Morten Boeriis, eds. 2018. Advancing multimodal and critical discourse studies: Interdisciplinary research inspired by Theo van Leeuwen’s social semiotics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • May Wong
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EnglishUniversity of Hong KongPok Fu LamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations