Advertisement

Simulation Curriculum Development, Integration, and Operations

  • Lori Lioce
  • Amelia S. Lanz
Chapter
Part of the Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation book series (CHS)

Abstract

Curriculum development is a daunting task due to the complexity of regulation, requests, design, execution, and evaluation. The Healthcare Simulation Technology Specialist (HSTS) should be familiar with the concept, process, and relational role of curriculum development in order to integrate simulation design and execute simulations to fulfill the overall mission and vision of their programs. This chapter explores common components of curriculum development, provides an introduction to pertinent educational concepts, and provides a framework for operationalizing simulation programs to achieve course and program outcomes.

Keywords

Regulation Needs assessment Objectives Outcomes Performance measures Curriculum development Curriculum integration Educational concepts Simulation operation framework 

References

  1. 1.
    Lioce L, Graham L. Call to action: ethical awareness in healthcare simulation. J Nurs Healthc. 2017;2(2):1–5.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ministry of Education Y, and Information. About [Online] http://www.moe.gov.jm/about. Government of Jamaica; [cited 2018 June 11]. Available from: http://www.moe.gov.jm/about
  3. 3.
    Ministry of Education of the Peoples Republic of China. The responsibilities of the ministry of education [Online] http://en.moe.gov.cn/About_the_Ministry/What_We_Do/201506/t20150626_191288.html [cited 2018 June 11]. Available from: http://en.moe.gov.cn/About_the_Ministry/What_We_Do/201506/t20150626_191288.html
  4. 4.
    U.S. Department of Education. An overview of the U.S. Department of Education [Online] https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/focus/what.html - whatis. U.S. Department of Education; 2010 [cited 2018 June 11]. Available from: https://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/focus/what.html - whatis.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Purva M, Nicklin J. ASPiH standards for simulation-based education: process of consultation, design and implementation. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018;4:117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crawford SB. ASPiH standards for simulation-based education: process of consultation, design and implementation. BMJ. 2018;4(3):103–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    U.S. Department of Education. Family educational rights and Privacy Act Regulations 2009; Jan 23 2018. Available from: https://www2.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/pdf/ferparegs.pdf
  9. 9.
    Valiga T. Curriculum evaluation. In: Oermann M, editor. A systematic approach to assessment and evaluation of nursing programs. Washington, DC: Wolters Kluwer; 2017. p. 19–28.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pak KM, Hardasmalani M. A multidisciplinary obstetric trauma resuscitation using in situ high-fidelity simulation. Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2015;37(1):51–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kern D, Thomas P, Hughes M, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Md Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    United States Navy. Naval Education and Training Command Integrated Learning Environment Course Development and life-cycle maintenance [Online] http://www.netc.navy.mil/ile/_Documents/NAVEDTRA136/NAVEDTRA_136.pdf; 2010. Available from: http://www.netc.navy.mil/ile/_Documents/NAVEDTRA136/NAVEDTRA_136.pdf
  13. 13.
    DeWolfe T. Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. In: Salem Press Encyclopedia of Health. Amenia: Grey House Publishing; 2013.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hean S, Craddock D, O’Halloran C. Learning theories and interprofessional education: a user’s guide. Learn Health Soc Care. 2009;8(4):250–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM simulation design. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(Supplement):s5–s12.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM outcomes and objectives. Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(Supplement):S13–5.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM simulation-enhanced interprofessional education (Sim-IPE). Clin Simul Nurs. 2016;12(Supplement):S34–S8.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluating training programs. San Francisco: Tata McGraw-Hill Education; 1975.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 2002;41(4):212–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    SimGHOSTS. Fundamentals of Training and Education [Online] https://www.simghosts.org/assnfe/Ev.asp?ID=33 [cited 2017 April 11]. Available from: https://www.simghosts.org/assnfe/Ev.asp?ID=33
  21. 21.
    Kuuskne M. How to develop targeted simulation learning objectives – part1: the theory. 2015 June 11, 2018. Available from: https://emsimcases.com/2015/04/21/how-to-develop-targeted-simulation-learning-objectives-part-1-the-theory/
  22. 22.
    University of Central Florida: Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning. Bloom’s Taxonomy, June 11, 2018. Available from: http://www.fctl.ucf.edu/teachingandlearningresources/coursedesign/bloomstaxonomy/.
  23. 23.
    E-Learning Heros. An introduction to Bloom’s taxonomy for instructional designers, June 11, 2018 [cited 2018]. Available from: https://community.articulate.com/articles/blooms-taxonomy-elearning-instructional-design
  24. 24.
    Leighton K. Development of the clinical learning environment comparison survey. Clin Simul Nurs. 2015;11(1):44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leighton K, Ravert P, Mudra V, Macintosh C. Updating the simulation effectiveness tool: item modifications and reevaluation of psychometric properties. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015;36(5):317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leighton K, Foisy-Doll C, Gilbert GE. Development and psychometric evaluation of the simulation culture organizational readiness survey. Nurse Educ. 2018;43(5):251–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leighton K, Mudra V, Gilbert GE. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Facilitator Competency Rubric. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2018;39(6):E3–E9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lewin K. Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Row; 1951.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lori Lioce
    • 1
  • Amelia S. Lanz
    • 1
  1. 1.College of NursingThe University of Alabama in HuntsvilleHuntsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations