Advertisement

Discourses of Dissonance: Enabling Sites of Praxis and Practice Amongst Arts and Design Doctoral Study

  • Jacqueline TaylorEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Ph.D. study occupies a fractional and anomalous space in the university structurally, pedagogically and otherwise. This chapter contends that the Arts and Design Ph.D. and its complex relationship with practice, inhabits a dissonant terrain that further disrupts the normative frameworks of the academe and the landscape of doctoral research itself. Underpinned by a conceptual model of ‘research-practice-pedagogy’ and research at the intersection of these fields, transformational, performative and embodied spaces of learning, teaching and becoming are explored as part of a spatiotemporality that brings to the fore spaces of praxis and practice. Whilst dissonance is normally conceived as a negative lexicon, the dissonance of the Arts and Design Ph.D. is reconceived as a generative para-dox in relation to academia’s doxa vital in eliciting ‘doctoralness’.

References

  1. Atkinson, D. (2013). The Pedagogy of the Event. In E. Fisher & R. Fortnum (Eds.), On Not Knowing: How Artists Think (pp. 136–145). London: Black Dog Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Government Department of Education and Training. (2016). https://www.education.gov.au/selected-higher-education-statistics-2016-student-data. Accessed 20 May 2018.
  3. Barrett, E., & Bolt, B. (Eds.). (2007). Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry. New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  4. Bolt, B. (2007). The Magic is in Handling. In E. Barrett & B. Bolt (Eds.), Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry (pp. 27–34). New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  5. Boultwood, A., Taylor, J., & Vaughan, S. (2015). The Importance of Coffee: Peer Mentoring to Support PGRs and ECRs in Art & Design. Vitae Occasional Papers: Research Careers and Cultures, CRAC, 2, 15–20.Google Scholar
  6. Bourner, T., & Simpson, P. (2014). Action Learning and the Pedagogy of Professional Doctorates. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 4(2), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brabazon. T. (2016). Winter is Coming: Doctoral Supervision in the Neoliberal University. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 3(1), 1–34.Google Scholar
  8. Candy, L. (2006). Practice Based Research: A Guide. Sydney: University of Technology. http://www.mangold-international.com/fileadmin/Media/References/Publications/Downloads/Practice_Based_Research_A_Guide.pdf. Accessed 6 Mar 2015.
  9. Elkins, J. (2009). Artists with PhDs: On the New Doctoral Degree in Studio Art. Washington, DC: New Academia Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Emlyn Jones, T. (2006). A Method of Search for Reality: Research and Research Degrees in Art and Design. In L. Holdridge & K. Macleod (Eds.), Thinking Through Art: Reflections on Art as Research (pp. 226–240). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Eurostat European Union Statistical Office. (2015). Tertiary Education Statistics. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Tertiary_education_statistics. Accessed 25 May 2018.
  12. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, E., & Fortnum, R. (2013). On Not Knowing: How Artists Think. London: Black Dog Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Frayling, C. (1993). Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  15. Garland, C. (2014). Emboldened and Unterrified. In. A. Wardrop & D. Withers (Eds.), The Para-Academic Handbook: A Toolkit for Making-Learning-Creating-Acting (pp. 71–80). Bristol: HammerOn Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gray, C., & Malins, J. (2004). Visualising Research: A Guide to the Research Process in Art & Design. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Hamilton, C., & Raine, S. (Eds.). (2017). Riffs: Experimental Writing on Popular Music—Beyond Borders Special Issue. http://riffsjournal.org/issues/special-edition-beyond-borders-july-2017/. Accessed 17 Jan 2018.
  18. Haseman, B. (2006). A Manifesto for Performative Research. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy,118, 98–106 (issue theme ‘Practice-led Research’).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawkins, H. (2018). On Mentoring—Reflections on Academic Caring as a Feminist Practice. http://www.gfgrg.org/on-mentoring-reflections-on-academic-caring-as-a-feminist-practice-by-harriet-hawkins/. Accessed 1 Mar 2018.
  20. Higher Education Statistics Agency UK. (2017). https://www.hesa.ac.uk/news/11-01-2018/sfr247-higher-education-student-statistics/qualifications. Accessed 22 May 2018.
  21. Hockey, J. (2008). Practice Based Research Degree Students in Art & Design: Identity and Adaption. In R. Hickman (Ed.), Research in Art and Design Education: Issues and Exemplars (pp. 109, 120). Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, S., & Oakley, C. (2018). The Precarious Postdoc: Interdisciplinary Research and Casualised Labour in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Durham: Hearing the Voice.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, A. (2008). How are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Macleod, K., & Holdridge, L. (Eds.). (2006). Thinking Through Art: Reflections on Art as Research. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Manathunga, C. (2012). Supervisors Watching Supervisors: The Deconstructive Possibilities and Tensions of Team Supervision. The Australian Universities’ Review, 54(1), 29–37.Google Scholar
  26. Maxwell, T. (2003). From First to Second Generation Professional Doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mottram, J., Rust, C., & Till, J. (2007). AHRC Research Review: Practice-led Research in Art, Design and Architecture. London: AHRC.Google Scholar
  28. Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newman, H. (2001). Locating Performance: Textual Identity and the Performative. Ph.D. thesis submitted to the University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  30. Park, C. (2005, July). New Variant PhD: The Changing Nature of the Doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quality Assurance Agency. (2014). UK Quality Code for UK Higher Education. https://www.qaa.ac.uk/docs/qaa/quality-code/qualifications-frameworks.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 2013.
  32. Rogoff, I. (2000). Terra Infirma: Geography’s Visual Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Rolfe, G. (2014). We Are All Para-Academics Now. In A. Wardrop & D. Withers (Eds.), The Para-Academic Handbook: A Toolkit for Making-Learning-Creating-Acting (pp. 1–5). Bristol: HammerOn Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rubidge, S. (2004). Artists in the Academy: Reflections on Artistic Practice as Research. Australian Arts Council. http://ausdance.org.au/articles/details/artists-in-the-academy-reflections-on-artistic-practice-as-research. Accessed 21 Feb 2017.
  35. SEEC. (2016). Credit Level Descriptors for Higher Education. http://www.seec.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2016/07/SEEC-descriptors-2016.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2016.
  36. Sullivan, G. (2005). Art Practice as Research: Enquiry in the Visual Arts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Sullivan, G. (2009). Making Space: The Purpose and Place of Practice-led Research. In R. T. Dean & H. Smith (Eds.), Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts (pp. 41–65). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, J. (2014, July). From ‘or’ to ‘and’: l’écriture féminine as an Approach to Fine Art Research. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 13(3), 305–313 (Sage Publishers).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, J. (2018). Research-Practice-Pedagogy: Establishing New Topologies of Doctoral Research in the Arts. In R. Prior (Ed.), Using Art as Research in Learning and Teaching: Multidisciplinary Approaches Across the Arts (pp. 91–108). London: Intellect.Google Scholar
  40. Taylor, J., & Vaughan, S. (2016). A Different Practice? Professional Identity and Doctoral Education in Art & Design. In V. A. Storey (Ed.), International Perspectives on Designing Professional Practice Doctorates: Applying the Critical Friends Approach to the EdD and Beyond (pp. 127–142). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Teikmanis, A. (2013). Typologies of Research. In M. Wilson & S. Van Ruiten (Eds.), SHARE: Handbook for Artistic Research Education (pp. 162–169). Amsterdam: ELIA.Google Scholar
  42. Vincs, K. (2007). Rhizome/MyZone: A Case Study in Studio-Based Dance Research. In E. Barrett & B. Bolt (Eds.), Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry (pp. 99–112). New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  43. Vitae. (2015). Researcher Development Framework. Cambridge: Careers Research and Advisory Centre (CRAC) Limited.Google Scholar
  44. Wardrop, A., & Withers, D. (Eds.). (2014). The Para-Academic Handbook: A Toolkit for Making-Learning-Creating-Acting. Bristol: HammerOn Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wilson, M. (2008). The ‘State of Play’ in Practice-led Research in Art, Design and Architecture. Brighton: AHRC/CHEAD.Google Scholar
  46. Wilson, M., & Van Ruiten, S. (Eds.). (2013). SHARE: Handbook for Artistic Research Education. Amsterdam: ELIA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Birmingham City UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations