Advertisement

Closed Doors: Academic Collegiality, Isolation, Competition and Resistance in the Contemporary Australian University

  • Briony LiptonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter is an exploration of how academic collegiality is constructed in and shaped by the spaces of the neoliberal university. Based on a series of in-depth qualitative interviews with women academics at several Australian universities as well as critical autoethnographic reflections. It is possible to see how collegiality is a set of gendered practices and performances rather than a quality or virtue. In this chapter academic women articulate the complexity and contradiction of collegiality discourse, and how as a consequence, women are rendered invisible in various academic spaces. This chapter thus also reveals how academic women have created alternative abstract and lived spaces for feminist collectivity in the changing internationalised higher education environment.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2014). Willful Subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M., & Due Billing, Y. (1997). Understanding Gender and Organisation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Baldry, C., & Barnes, A. (2012). The Open-Plan Academy: Space, Control and the Undermining of Professional Identity. Work, Employment & Society, 26(2), 228–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, E., & King, D. (2010). The Elephant in the Room: Critical Management Studies Conferences as a Site of Body Pedagogics. Management Learning, 41(4), 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlant, L. (1998). Collegiality, Crisis, and Cultural Studies. Profession 1998 (pp. 105–116). New York: MLA.Google Scholar
  6. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black, A. L., & Garvis, S. (Eds.). (2018). Lived Experiences of Women in Academia: Metaphors, Manifestos and Memoir. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Caesar, T. (2005). The Specter of Collegiality. Symploke, 13(1–2), 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cresswell, T. (1996). In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology, and Transgression. Minneapolis, MS: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Danielewicz, J., & McGowan, J. (2005). Collaborative Work: A Practical Guide. Symploke, 13(1–2), 168–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Due Billing, Y. (2011). Are Women in Management Victims of the Phantom of the Male Norm? Gender, Work and Organization, 18(3), 298–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferguson, K. E. (1995). The Man Question: Visions of Subjectivity in Feminist Theory. Hypatia, 10(4), 143–150.Google Scholar
  13. Finke, L. (2005). Performing Collegiality, Troubling Gender. Symploke, 13(1–2), 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitzgerald, T. (2014). Women Leaders in Higher Education: Shattering Myths. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Gardiner, J. K. (2005). On Collegiality, Collectivity and Gender. Symploke, 13(1–2), 108–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gatens, M. (1996). Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Gill, R. (2010). Breaking the Silence: Hidden Injuries of the Neoliberal University. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  19. hooks, b. (1990). Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hurdley, R. (2015). Pretty Pants and Office Pants: Making Home, Identity and Belonging in a Workplace. In Y. Taylor & E. Casey (Eds.), Intimacies, Critical Consumption and Diverse Economies. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  21. Khoo, T. (2014, August 12). Open Plan, Not Working. The Research Whisperer. https://theresearchwhisperer.wordpress.com/2014/08/12/open-plan-not-working/. Accessed 20 Sept 2018.
  22. Kligyte, G., & Barrie, S. (2014). Collegiality: Leading Us into Fantasy—The Paradoxical Resilience of Collegiality in Academic Leadership. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(1), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lipton, B. (2017). Writing Through the Labyrinth: Using L’ecriture Feminine in Leadership Studies. Leadership, 12(1), 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Macfarlane, B. (2017). The Paradox of Collaboration: A Moral Continuum. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(3), 472–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Morley, L. (2014). Lost Leaders: Women in the Global Academy. Higher Education Research and Development, 33(1), 114–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newman, J. (2012). Working the Spaces of Power: Activism, Neoliberalism and Gendered Labour. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  28. Pratt, G. (1998). Geographic Metaphors in Feminist Theory. In S. Hardy Aiken, A. Brigham, S. A. Marston, & P. Waterstone (Eds.), Making Worlds: Gender, Metaphor, Materiality. Tuscon, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  29. Puwar, N. (2004). Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  30. Reay, D. (2004). ‘It’s All Becoming a Habitus’: Beyond the Habitual Use of Habitus in Educational Research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shilling, C. (2007). Sociology and the Body: Classical Traditions and New Agendas. The Sociological Review, 55(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor, Y. (Ed.). (2014). The Entrepreneurial University: Engaging Publics, Intersecting Impacts. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Taylor, Y., & Lahad, K. (2018). Feeling Academic in the Neoliberal University: Feminist Flights, Fights and Failures. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thwaites, R., & Pressland, A. (2017). Being an Early Career Feminist Academic: Global Perspectives, Experiences, and Challenges. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tyler, M., & Cohen, L. (2010). Spaces That Matter: Gender Performativity and Organizational Space. Organization Studies, 31(2), 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2014). Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment. Journal of Management Studies, 51(3), 460–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van Oort, R. (2005). Crisis and Collegiality. Symploke, 13(1–2), 158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watt, S. (2005). Collegial Propositions. Symploke, 13(1–2), 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woolf, V. (2001 [1928]). A Room of One’s Own. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations