Advertisement

Response-Ability: Re-E-Valuing Shameful Measuring Processes Within the Australian Academy

  • Melissa Joy WolfeEmail author
  • Eve Mayes
Chapter

Abstract

Evaluative practices dominate contemporary conditions of existence for academics in higher education. These measures are reductive and limit knowledge-making capacity. This chapter considers the concept of evaluation (linked to measurement) as dynamic and of consequence. In an experimental methodological approach, we read ‘evaluation’ through two of our own personally stultifying and shameful encounters within the Australian academy. This critique does not simply oppose evaluative methods but opens up a discussion that allows the conceptualisation of evaluation as mattering otherwise. We promote an ethics of affect in relation to the performance of academics as knowledge makers by considering how consequences of practices are always co-constituted. Evaluation processes are re-conceptualised response-ably, to build capacity for a diversity of knowledges and to matter otherwise.

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2012). On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2010). Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/Continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2012). On Touching—The Inhuman That Therefore I Am. Differences, 25(5), 206–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beausoleil, E. (2015). Embodying an Ethics of Response-Ability. Borderlands, 14(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blackman, L. (2007). Researching Affect and Embodied Hauntologies: Exploring an Analytics of Experimentation. In B. T. Knudsen & C. Stage (Eds.), Affective Methodologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Boswell, S. S. (2016). Ratemyprofessors Is Hogwash (but I Care): Effects of Ratemyprofessors and University-Administered Teaching Evaluations on Professors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian Higher Education: Final Report. Canberra, A.C.T.: Dept. of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  11. Brøgger, K., & Staunæs, D. (2016). Standards and (Self)Implosion: How the Circulation of Affects Accelerates the Spread of Standards and Intensifies the Embodiment of Colliding, Temporal Ontologies. Theory & Psychology, 26(2), 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryant, L. R. (2016). Phenomenon and Thing: Barad’s Performative Ontology. Rhizomes: Cultural Studies in Emerging Knowledge (30), 133–144.Google Scholar
  13. Burrows, R. (2012). Living with the h-Index? Metric Assemblages in the Contemporary Academy. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charteris, J., Gannon, S., Mayes, E., Nye, A., & Stephenson, L. (2016). The Emotional Knots of Academicity: A Collective Biography of Academic Subjectivities and Spaces. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(1), 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chubb, J., Watermeyer, R., & Wakeling, P. (2017). Fear and Loathing in the Academy? The Role of Emotion in Response to an Impact Agenda in the UK and Australia. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(3), 555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dolphijn, R. (2016). Critical Naturalism: A Quantum Mechanical Ethics. Rhizomes: Cultural Studies in Emerging Knowledge (30), 145–151.Google Scholar
  17. Flew, T. (2014). Six Theories of Neoliberalism. Thesis Eleven, 122(1), 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox, N., & Alldred, P. (2018). Social Structures, Power and Resistance in Monist Sociology: (New) Materialist Insights. Journal of Sociology, 54(3), 315–330.Google Scholar
  19. Grealy, L., & Laurie, T. (2017). Higher Degree Research by Numbers: Beyond the Critiques of Neo-Liberalism. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(3), 458–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hey, V., & Bradford, S. (2004). The Return of the Repressed?: The Gender Politics of Emergent Forms of Professionalism in Education. Journal of Education Policy, 19(6), 691–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hook, G. A., & Wolfe, M. J. (2017). Affective Violence: Re/Negotiating Gendered-Feminism Within New Materialism. Journal of Gender Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1340151.
  23. Jackson, A. Y. (2017). Thinking Without Method. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lipton, B. (2017). Measures of Success: Cruel Optimism and the Paradox of Academic Women’s Participation in Australian Higher Education. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(3), 486–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loveday, V. (2016). Embodying Deficiency Through ‘Affective Practice’: Shame, Relationality, and the Lived Experience of Social Class and Gender in Higher Education. Sociology, 50(6), 1140–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MacLure, M. (2013). Researching Without Representation? Language and Materiality in Post-qualitative Methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayes, E. (2018a). The Ontological Plurality of Digital Voice: A Schizoanalysis of Rate My Professors and Rate My Teachers. In D. Cole & J. Bradley (Eds.), Principles of Transversality in Globalization and Education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Mayes, E. (2018b). Student Voice in School Reform? Desiring Simultaneous Critique and Affirmation. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2018.1492517.
  29. Mayes, E., & Wolfe, M. (2018). Shameful Interest in Educational Research. Critical Studies in Education, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2018.1489871.
  30. Mazzei, L. A. (2017). Following the Contour of Concepts Toward a Minor Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417725356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nixon, E., Scullion, R., & Hearn, R. (2016). Her Majesty the Student: Marketised Higher Education and the Narcissistic (Dis)Satisfactions of the Student-Consumer. Studies in Higher Education, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1196353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ocean, J., & Skourdoumbis, A. (2016). Whose Counting? Legitimating Measurement in the Audit Culture. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 442–456.Google Scholar
  33. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peseta, T., Barrie, S., & McLean, J. (2017). Academic Life in the Measured University: Pleasures, Paradoxes and Politics. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(3), 453–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Puar, J. K. (2012). ‘I Would Rather Be a Cyborg Than a Goddess’: Becoming-Intersectional in Assemblage Theory. philoSOPHIA, 2(1), 49–66.Google Scholar
  37. Rasmussen, M. (2014). Affecting Affiliations: Queer Relationality and the Boy in the Dress. Methodological Affects: Considering Research Emotion in Qualitative Research. Symposium—American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  38. Richardson, J. T. E. (2005). Instruments for Obtaining Student Feedback: A Review of the Literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 387–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sedgwick, E. K., & Frank, A. (1995). Shame in the Cybernetic Fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins. Critical Inquiry, 21(2), 496–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sellar, S. (2015). A Feel for Numbers: Affect, Data and Education Policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Selwyn, N. (2015). Data Entry: Towards the Critical Study of Digital Data and Education. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spinoza, B. D. (1994). The Ethics. In E. M. Curley (Ed.), A Spinoza Reader: The Ethics and Other Works. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2017). On the Need for Methods Beyond Proceduralism: Speculative Middles, (In)Tensions, and Response-Ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. St. Pierre, E. A. (2013a). The Appearance of Data. Cultural Studies: Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. St. Pierre, E. A. (2013b). The Posts Continue: Becoming. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 646–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. St. Pierre, E. A. (2017). Haecceity: Laying Out a Plane for Post Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417727764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Staunaes, D. (2016). Notes on Inventive Methodologies and Affirmative Critiques of an Affective Edu-Future. Research in Education, 96(1), 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stern, M. (2012). “We Can’t Build Our Dreams on Suspicious Minds”: Neoliberalism, Education Policy, and the Feelings Left Over. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 12(5), 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, C. A., & Gannon, S. (2018). Doing Time and Motion Diffractively: Academic Life Everywhere and All the Time. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1422286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tomkins, S. (1995a). Exploring Affect: The Selected Writings of Silvan S. Tomkins. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; New York, Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
  51. Tomkins, S. (1995b). Shame and Its Sisters: A Silvan Tomkins Reader (E. K. Sedgwick & A. Frank, Eds.). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Tucker, B. (2013). Development of a Student Evaluation Quality Culture: The eVALUate Experience at Curtin University. Enhancing Student Feedback and Improvement Systems in Tertiary Education. In Commission for Academic Accreditation (Ed.), CAA Quality Series; 5 (pp. 16–33). Abu Dhabi, UAE: Commission for Academic Accreditation.Google Scholar
  53. Wolfe, M. J. (2017a). Refracting Schoolgirls: Pedagogical Intra-actions Producing Shame. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(5), 727–739.Google Scholar
  54. Wolfe, M. J. (2017b). Affective Schoolgirl Assemblages Making School Spaces of Non/Belonging. Emotion, Space and Society, 25, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wolfe, M. J., & Rasmussen, M. L. (2019, forthcoming). The Affective Matter of School Uniforms: The [School] Dress that is and Does. In B. Dernikos, N. Lesko, S. McCall, D., & A. Niccolini (Eds.), High Passions: An Affect and Education Reader. Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations