Advertisement

Prophylactic Versus Reactive Gastrostomy Tube Placement for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients

  • Rawan ArifEmail author
  • Mazin Merdad
Chapter
Part of the Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach book series (DDSURGERY)

Abstract

Introduction: The use of gastrostomy tubes (GT) has become common among advanced head and neck cancer patients. This chapter aims to review the available evidence comparing the utility of prophylactic gastrostomy tubes (pGT) placement versus the reactive gastrostomy tubes placement (rGT).

Methodology: Based on the PICO format, PubMed and Google Scholar databases were screened for eligibility according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Only articles having two arms comparing prophylactic to reactive gastrostomy tube placement were included. Review articles and consensus statements were excluded.

Results: There are few double-armed studies in the literature examining the difference in outcomes between pGT and rGT. The results from across the studies are variable and heterogeneous making cross comparison of the data challenging. Overall, neither pGT nor rGT seemed to offer any clear advantages regarding nutritional outcomes, length of dependency, severity of dysphagia, or survival.

Conclusion: Optimally timing the GT placement in advanced head and neck cancer patients is a challenging decision. The decision should be individualized to each patient based on the desired outcomes. While pGT does not seem to offer any clear advantages over rGT, the rGT approach might be a preferable approach when the healthcare facility is equipped for a prompt GT placement when or if the need arises.

References

  1. 1.
    Cady J. Nutritional support during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: the role of prophylactic feeding tube placement. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007;11(6):875–80.  https://doi.org/10.1188/07.CJON.875-880.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen AM, Li B-Q, Lau DH, et al. Evaluating the role of prophylactic gastrostomy tube placement prior to definitive chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78(4):1026–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wood K. Audit of nutritional guidelines for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2005;18(5):343–51.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.2005.00632.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mala E, Vejrazkova E, Bielmeierova J, et al. Long term monitoring of nutritional, clinical status and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Klin Onkol. 2015;28(3):200–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Copeland EM 3rd, Daly JM, Dudrick SJ. Nutritional concepts in the treatment of head and neck malignancies. Head Neck Surg. 1979;1(4):350–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van der Linden NC, Kok A, Leermakers-Vermeer MJ, et al. Indicators for enteral nutrition use and prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017;32(2):225–32.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533616682684.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goda M, Jinnouchi O, Takaoka T, et al. Efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on unplanned treatment interruption and nutritional status in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer. J Med Investig. 2015;62(3–4):173–6.  https://doi.org/10.2152/jmi.62.173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brown TE, Banks MD, Hughes BGM, Lin CY, Kenny LM, Bauer JD. Randomised controlled trial of early prophylactic feeding vs standard care in patients with head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer. 2017;117(1):15–24.  https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.138.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Romesser PB, Romanyshyn JC, Schupak KD, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Cancer. 2012;118(24):6072–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27633.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams GF, Teo MTW, Sen M, Dyker KE, Coyle C, Prestwich RJD. Enteral feeding outcomes after chemoradiotherapy for oropharynx cancer: a role for a prophylactic gastrostomy? Oral Oncol. 2012;48(5):434–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2011.11.022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Machtay M, Moughan J, Trotti A, et al. Factors associated with severe late toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: an RTOG analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3582–9.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8841.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roe JWG, Carding PN, Dwivedi RC, et al. Swallowing outcomes following Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for head & neck cancer – a systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2010;46(10):727–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.07.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shaw SM, Flowers H, O’Sullivan B, Hope A, Liu LWC, Martino R. The effect of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement on swallowing and swallow-related outcomes in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2015;30(2):152–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9592-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Olson R, Karam I, Wilson G, Bowman A, Lee C, Wong F. Population-based comparison of two feeding tube approaches for head and neck cancer patients receiving concurrent systemic-radiation therapy: is a prophylactic feeding tube approach harmful or helpful? Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(12):3433–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1936-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Silander E, Nyman J, Bove M, Johansson L, Larsson S, Hammerlid E. Impact of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on malnutrition and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized study. Head Neck. 2012;34(1):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Axelsson L, Silander E, Nyman J, Bove M, Johansson L, Hammerlid E. Effect of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube on swallowing in advanced head and neck cancer: a randomized controlled study. Head Neck. 2017;39(5):908–15.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24707.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kramer S, Newcomb M, Hessler J, Siddiqui F. Prophylactic versus reactive PEG tube placement in head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(3):407–12.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813517081.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rutter CE, Yovino S, Taylor R, et al. Impact of early percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement on nutritional status and hospitalization in patients with head and neck cancer receiving definitive chemoradiation therapy. Head Neck. 2011;33(10):1441–7.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21624.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bossola M. Nutritional interventions in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy: a narrative review. Nutrients. 2015;7(1):265–76.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nu7010265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck SurgeryKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations