Total hip arthroplasty has been one of the most successful orthopedic procedures over the past 30 years. Currently, several surgical approaches for hip arthroplasty have been defined; these include the anterior, lateral, and posterolateral approaches. In literature the advantages and disadvantages of each surgical approach have been documented and which approach will be chosen depends on the experience of the surgeon. This chapter focuses on anterior minimally invasive surgery (AMIS). This surgical approach follows an intermuscular and inter-nervous plane to reduce the risk of injury to muscles, tendons, vessels, and nerves. This review discusses the history, technique, tricks, and pitfalls of AMIS procedure that reduces anatomical invasiveness and blood loss and speeds up the functional recovery of the patient.
Hip replacement AMIS Anterior approach Minimally invasive hip surgery Hip-preservation surgery
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Figures and illustrations by: Dakshini Egodawatte MBBS (SAITM), Clinical demonstrator in Trauma and Orthopaedics Neville Fernando Teaching Hospital, Malabe, Sri Lanka.
Charnley J. Total hip replacement by low friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970;(72):7–21.Google Scholar
Charnley J, Cupic Z. The nine and ten year results of the low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973:9–25.Google Scholar
Tsukada S, Wakui M. Lower dislocation rate following total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach than via posterior approach: five year average follow up results. Open Orthop J. 2015;9:157–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Sariali E, Leonard P, Mamoudy P. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using Hueter anterior approach. J Arthroplast. 2008;23:266–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amarasekera HW. Surface replacement of the hip joint. In: Fokter SK, editor. Recent advances in hip and knee arthroplasty. 1st ed. Croatia: Intech; 2012. p. 181–90.Google Scholar
Oinuma K, Eingartner C, Saito Y, Shiratsuchi H. Total hip arthroplasty by a minimally invasive, direct anterior approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2007;19:310–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Nogler M, Mayr E, Krismer M. The direct anterior approach to the hip revisionOper Orthop Traumatol. 2012;24:153–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rachbauer F. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Anterior approach. Orthopade. 2006;35:723-4–6-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachbauer F, Krismer M. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2008;20:239–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez JA, Deshmukh AJ, Rathod PA, et al. Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:455–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Zhang Z, Wang C, Yang P, Dang X, Wang K. Comparison of early rehabilitation effects of total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach versus posterior approach. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018;32:329–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Jahng KH, Bas MA, Rodriguez JA, Cooper HJ. Risk factors for wound complications after direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2016;31:2583–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts CD, Houdek MT, Wagner ER, Sculco PK, Chalmers BP, Taunton MJ. High risk of wound complications following direct anterior total hip arthroplasty in obese patients. J Arthroplast. 2015;30:2296–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton C, Kim PR. Complications of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:371–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kreuzer S, Leffers K, Kumar S. Direct anterior approach for hip resurfacing: surgical technique and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1574–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Khemka A, Mograby O, Lord SJ, Doyle Z, Al Muderis M. Total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach using a neck preserving stem: safety, efficacy and learning curve. Indian J Orthop. 2018;52:124–32.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
Post ZD, Orozco F, Diaz-Ledezma C, Hozack WJ, Ong A. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: indications, technique, and results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:595–603.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Wayne N, Stoewe R. Primary total hip arthroplasty: a comparison of the lateral Hardinge approach to an anterior mini invasive approach. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2009;1:e27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faldini C, Mazzotti A, Perna F, et al. Modified minimally invasive direct anterior approach through a bikini incision for total hip arthroplasty: technique and results in young female patients. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017;31:83–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Amarasekera H. Surgical approaches to the hip joint and its clinical implications in adult hip arthroplasty. In: Kinov P, editor. Arthroplasty. 1st ed. London: Intech; 2013.Google Scholar