Advertisement

Potential of Carbon Footprint Reduction within Retailers: Food Waste at Walmart in Mexico

  • Jorge Carlos Carpio-AguilarEmail author
  • John Rincón-Moreno
  • María-Laura Franco-García
Chapter
Part of the Greening of Industry Networks Studies book series (GINS, volume 7)

Abstract

Food wastage is a major problem at all supply chains stages that faces severe implications such as the environmental cost associated to the release of greenhouse gases and loss of monetary value due to inefficient use of resources. According to FAO (Food wastage footprint: impacts on natural resources: summary report. FAO, Rome, 2013) the global carbon footprint (CF) of annual food wastage is about 3.3 Gt carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). This fact is altering the sustainability of the food supply chain. Although retailers as part of the food supply chain do not generate as much food waste as other stages, the food management at the retailers’ stage is deeply encompassed. Their influence as the nexus amongst producers and consumers play a key role on the amount of food wasted throughout the supply chain. Therefore, the retail sector’s strategies to reduce food wastage seem to be essential in order to pursue a sustainable economy and to combat climate change. Moreover, it is also aligned to the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) number 12 from the United Nations “Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns” that establishes an objective that “by 2030, halve per capita global food waste at the retail and consumer levels and reduce food losses along production and supply chains”. In this scenario, one of the best practices of Walmart Inc. is the Project Gigaton. The objective of this project is to avoid the generation of one billion CO2 tons throughout the Walmart’ supply chain. In order to demonstrate best practices and to lead its suppliers towards CO2 reduction initiatives, Walmart Mexico as one of the main markets of the company is implementing the “Zero Waste” (ZW) strategy on its operations. The ZW strategy at Walmart is aimed to manage efficiently any type of waste and also to consider the potential carbon footprint reduction due to a proper food waste management. Hence, this research sought to explore the potential of the carbon footprint reduction through different alternative food waste management routes aimed to lessen even further Walmart Mexico’s environmental footprint. Consequently, in this chapter, the carbon footprint emissions were calculated based on each final destination, which includes: food donations to food banks, animal feeding, bio-digestion and composting. The findings of this analysis showed that every final destination had a reduction of the carbon footprint from food waste avoidance, which would help to support the development and actions needed to amplify the benefits of the ZW strategy in a broader scope and to contribute to the SDG.

Keywords

Sustainable development goals Zero food waste Retailer Greenhouse emissions reduction Carbon footprint Sustainable production and consumption 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special acknowledgement goes to MSc Juan Carlos Camargo-Fernández (Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Deputy Director of Walmart Mexico and Central America) who generously provided very valuable feedback to enrich the content of this chapter.

References

  1. Brancoli P, Rousta K, Bolton K (2017) Life cycle assessment of supermarket food waste. Resour Conserv Recycl 118:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cicatiello C, Franco S, Pancino B, Blasi E (2016) The value of food waste: an exploratory study on retailing. J Retail Consum Serv 30:96–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Claro DP, Laban Neto SA, Oliveira Claro PB (2013) Sustainability drivers in food retail. J Retail Consum Serv 20(3):365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2018, January 28) Circular economy. Retrieved from Circular economy overview: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy
  5. Eriksson M, Strid I, Hansson P-A (2016) Food waste reduction in supermarkets – net costs and beenfits of reduced storage temperature. Resour Conserv Recycl 107:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. FAO (2011) Global food losses and food waste – extent, causes and prevention. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2013) Food wastage footprint: impacts on natural resources: summary report. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015) Food wastage footprint: impacts on natural resources: summary report. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  9. Hanson C, Mitchell P (2017) The business case for reducing food loss and waste. Champion 12.3, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Lipinski B, O’Connor C, Hanson C (2016) SDG target 12.3 on food loss and waste: 2016 progress report. Champions 12.3, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Papargyropoulou E, Lozano R, Steinberger JK, Wright N, bin Ujang Z (2014) The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. J Clean Prod 76:106–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Parfitt J, Barthel M, Macnaughton S (2010) Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 365(1554):3065–3081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rincón Moreno J, Franco García M-L, Carpio Aguilar JC, Hernández Sanabria M (2018) Share, optimize, closed-loop for food waste (SOL4FoodWaste): the case of Walmart-Mexico. In Franco García M-L, Carpio Aguilar JC, Bressers H (ed) Towards zero waste, circular economy boost: waste to resources. Springer International Publishing (in print)Google Scholar
  14. Scholz K, Eriksson M, Strid I (2015) Carbon footprint of supermarket food waste. Resour Conserv Recycl 94:56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stuart T (2009) Waste: uncovering the global food scandal. WW Norton & Company, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. The Government Office for Science (2011) Foresight project on global food and farming futures synthesis report C7: reducing waste. LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. United Nations. (2017, 11 14). Sustainable development goals. Retrieved from United Nations: http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/
  18. United Nations (2018) Partnership for the SDGs, January 2018. Retrieved from Global registry of voluntary commitments & multi-stakeholder partnerships: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
  19. USCIB (2018) Business for 2030, January 28. Retrieved from Business + SDGs by company – Walmart: http://www.businessfor2030.org/
  20. Walmart México y Centroamérica (2018a) Información financiera, January 29. Retrieved from Reporte anual 2016: https://www.walmex.mx/informacion-financiera/anual/
  21. Walmart México y Centroamérica (2018b) Información financiera, June 29. Retrieved from Reporte anual 2017: https://www.walmex.mx/informacion-financiera/anual/
  22. Walmart Stores Inc (2017) Walmart sustainability hub, November 21. Retrieved from Walmart sustainability hub web site: https://www.walmartsustainabilityhub.com/project-gigaton/waste
  23. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (2018a) Walmart 2017 global responsibility report, January 28. Retrieved from Reducing environmental impacts: https://corporate.walmart.com/2017grr/sustainability/reducing-environmental-impacts#grr-h2-class-cms-heading-grr-h2-reducing-food-and-product-waste-upstream-and-downstream-grr-h2
  24. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (2018b) Walmart Newsroom sustainability, January 28. Retrieved from Walmart launches project gigaton to reduce emissions in company’s supply chain: https://news.walmart.com/2017/04/19/walmart-launches-project-gigaton-to-reduce-emissions-in-companys-supply-chain
  25. Walmex (2015) Walmart Mexico, December 31. Retrieved from Walmart Mexico web site: http://walmart16.ciro17mx.net/pdf/esp/walmart_2015_informe_anual.pdf
  26. World Resources Institute (2017) Food loss and waste accounting and reporting standard. Food Loss and Waste Protocol, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge Carlos Carpio-Aguilar
    • 1
    Email author
  • John Rincón-Moreno
    • 2
  • María-Laura Franco-García
    • 3
  1. 1.Walmart Mexico and Central AmericaMexico CityMexico
  2. 2.University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences (BMS), Department of Governance and Technology for Sustainability (CSTM)University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations