Advertisement

The Brain-Gut Axis and the Gender

  • Giovanni BarbaraEmail author
  • Maria Giulia Regazzi
  • Maria Raffaella Barbaro
  • Giovanni Dothel
  • Ilaria Tarricone
Chapter

Abstract

The term brain-gut axis depicts an anatomic and functional substrate in which the brain and psychosocial factors influence the GI tract and vice versa. The hardwiring between the brain and gut is mainly, but not solely, represented by a complex integrated circuitry that exchanges information from emotional and cognitive centers of the brain to the peripheral functioning of the GI tract and vice versa [1]. This communication is mainly based on a dense network of neurons connecting the brain and the gut, composed by afferent and efferent components and functioning via the exchange of neurochemical molecules released at the level of neuronal synapses, namely, neurotransmitters. Structurally, there are direct connections between the central nervous system (CNS) and the myenteric plexus, the muscle layers, and other end-organ structures [2]. Other systems take part in the complex process of communication in the brain-gut axis and include immune, endocrine, and microbial factors. The gut microenvironment of the gastrointestinal tract is a rich source of signals for the brain. The gut is particularly enriched with molecules derived from the microbiome (a complex microbial world composed by not only bacteria but also viruses and fungi), enteroendocrine cells (producing 95% of body’s serotonin among other hormonal substances), and a large bulk of immune cells, comprising the largest immune organ of the human body. These substances can communicate with the brain via different modalities. These include a direct signaling of immune, endocrine, and bacterial mediators on specific receptors located on sensory nerve ending conveying information to the brain. Examples of this communication include toll-like receptors located on enteric nerves and sensory afferent fibers sensing substances produced by bacteria (e.g., lipopolysaccharide), viruses, and fungi. Gut microenvironment substances can also communicate to the brain through the bloodstream reaching higher centers through the passage of the blood-brain barrier. This is the case for many food-derived substances but also for microbiota-derived molecules or products deriving from the bacterial fermentation of foods (e.g., short-chain fatty acids). The relevance of the bloodstream pathway and the constant production of gut-derived metabolites, particularly of bacterial origin, with a potential impact on the brain, is clearly revealed in patients with liver failure in whom the normal passage of numerous catabolites produced as a process of bacterial degradation of foods (particularly ammonia) reaches the brain without liver detoxification and generates hepatic encephalopathy of various degrees of severity up to coma. Interestingly, this severe brain dysfunction can be reversed by reducing intestinal bacterial load with laxatives (e.g., lactulose) and nonabsorbable antibiotics (e.g., rifaximin).

Keywords

Brain-gut axis Gender Functional gastrointestinal disorders Irritable bowel syndrome 

References

  1. 1.
    Drossman DA. Functional gastrointestinal disorders: history, pathophysiology, clinical features and Rome IV. Gastroenterology. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.032.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jones MP, Dilley JB, Drossman D, Crowell MD. Brain-gut connections in functional GI disorders: anatomic and physiologic relationships. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2006;18(2):91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seminowicz DA, Labus JS, Bueller JA, Tillisch K, Naliboff BD, Bushnell MC, et al. Regional gray matter density changes in brains of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(1):48–57.e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lovell RM, Ford AC. Effect of gender on prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(7):991–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee OY, Mayer EA, Schmulson M, Chang L, Naliboff B. Gender-related differences in IBS symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(7):2184–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Houghton LA, Heitkemper M, Crowell M, Emmanuel A, Halpert A, McRoberts JA, et al. Age, gender and women’s health and the patient. Gastroenterology. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barbara G, Feinle-Bisset C, Ghoshal UC, Quigley EM, Santos J, Vanner S, et al. The intestinal microenvironment and functional gastrointestinal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Simren M, Barbara G, Flint HJ, Spiegel BM, Spiller RC, Vanner S, et al. Intestinal microbiota in functional bowel disorders: a Rome foundation report. Gut. 2013;62(1):159–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Camilleri M, Mayer EA, Drossman DA, Heath A, Dukes GE, McSorley D, et al. Improvement in pain and bowel function in female irritable bowel patients with alosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;13(9):1149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miller JL. FDA draws patients into alosetron risk management. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2000;57(19):1736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tack J, van Outryve M, Beyens G, Kerstens R, Vandeplassche L. Prucalopride (Resolor) in the treatment of severe chronic constipation in patients dissatisfied with laxatives. Gut. 2009;58(3):357–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muller-Lissner SA, Fumagalli I, Bardhan KD, Pace F, Pecher E, Nault B, et al. Tegaserod, a 5-HT(4) receptor partial agonist, relieves symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome patients with abdominal pain, bloating and constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15(10):1655–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kellow J, Lee OY, Chang FY, Thongsawat S, Mazlam MZ, Yuen H, et al. An Asia-Pacific, double blind, placebo controlled, randomised study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tegaserod in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2003;52(5):671–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nyhlin H, Bang C, Elsborg L, Silvennoinen J, Holme I, Ruegg P, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of tegaserod in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39(2):119–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ouyang A, Wrzos HF. Contribution of gender to pathophysiology and clinical presentation of IBS: should management be different in women? Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(12 Suppl):S602–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moser G, Tragner S, Gajowniczek EE, Mikulits A, Michalski M, Kazemi-Shirazi L, et al. Long-term success of GUT-directed group hypnosis for patients with refractory irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(4):602–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gonsalkorale WM, Miller V, Afzal A, Whorwell PJ. Long term benefits of hypnotherapy for irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2003;52(11):1623–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Barbara
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria Giulia Regazzi
    • 1
  • Maria Raffaella Barbaro
    • 1
  • Giovanni Dothel
    • 1
  • Ilaria Tarricone
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, St. Orsola-Malpighi HospitalUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Bologna Transcultural Psychosomatic Team (BoTPT), Department of Medical and Surgical SciencesAlma Mater Studiorum, University of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations