Advertisement

Optimization of Response and Processing Time for Smart Societies Using Particle Swarm Optimization and Levy Walk

  • Ayesha Anjum Butt
  • Zahoor Ali Khan
  • Nadeem JavaidEmail author
  • Annas Chand
  • Aisha Fatima
  • Muhammad Talha Islam
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 926)

Abstract

Reducing delay and latency in the cloud computing environment is a challenge for the present research community. This study performed a rigorous, comparative analysis of the fog computing paradigm and the conventional cloud computing paradigm in the context of the Smart Grid (SG). To meet the consumers’ demand and optimize cloud services to achieve service level objectives is of great importance. The fog is introduced to enhance the efficiency of the cloud and to fulfill the consumer requests at the edge of the network. When the requests of Smart Societies (SSs) are huge on fog, the increased demand for real-time response is becoming a challenge for the SG. In this study, Particle Swarm Optimization is implemented and compared with the proposed techniques: Improved PSO with Lewy Walk (IPSOLW). These load balancing algorithms are compared on the basis of Closest Data Center (CDC) and Optimize Response Time (ORT). These proposed algorithms handle the load of SS on fog. The proposed IPSOLW handles more requests because of LW, the requests are directly allocated to best DC.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang, Z., Hayat, M.M., Ghani, N., Shaban, K.B.: Optimizing cloud-service performance: efficient resource provisioning via optimal workload allocation. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 28(6), 1689–1702 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, D., Gkountouvas, T., Meng, M., Birman, K., Bose, A., Hauser, C., Litvinov, E., Luo, X., Zhang, F.: GridCloud: infrastructure for cloud-based wide area monitoring of bulk electric power grids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 1–10 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, W., Zhou, F., Li, J.: Cloud-based parallel power flow calculation using resilient distributed datasets and directed acyclic graph. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, 1–13 (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu, L., Jiang, T., Zou, Y.: Fog-assisted operational cost reduction for cloud data centers. IEEE Access 5, 13578–13586 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buksh, R., Javaid, N., Fatima, I.: Towards efficient resource utilization exploiting collaboration between HPF and 5G enabled energy management controllers in smart homes. Sustainability 10(10), 3592 (2018). 3–24Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leontiou, N., Dechouniotis, D., Denazis, S., Papavassiliou, S.: A hierarchical control framework of load balancing and resource allocation of cloud computing services. Comput. Electr. Eng. 67, 235–251 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhao, H., Wang, J., Liu, F., Wang, Q., Zhang, W., Zheng, Q.: Power-aware and performance-guaranteed virtual machine placement in the cloud. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 29(6), 1385–1400 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xue, S., Zhang, Y., Xiaolong, X., Xing, G., Xiang, H., Ji, S.: QET: a QoS-based energy-aware task scheduling method in cloud environment. Cluster Comput. 20(4), 3199–3212 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mann, Z.Á.: Resource optimization across the cloud stack. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 29(1), 169–182 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liao, D., Sun, G., Yang, G., Chang, V.: Energy-efficient virtual content distribution network provisioning in cloud-based data centers. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 83, 347–357 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pau, M., Patti, E., Barbierato, L., Estebsari, A., Pons, E., Ponci, F., Monti, A.: A cloud-based smart metering infrastructure for distribution grid services and automation. Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 15, 14–25 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abdel-Basset, M., Abdle-Fatah, L., Sangaiah, A.K.: An improved Lévy based whale optimization algorithm for bandwidth-efficient virtual machine placement in cloud computing environment. Cluster Comput., 1–16 (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mirjalili, S., Saremi, S., Mirjalili, S.M., dos Coelho, L.: Multi-objective grey wolf optimizer: a novel algorithm for multi-criterion optimization. Expert Syst. Appl. 47, 106–119 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jensi and Wiselin Jiji: An enhanced particle swarm optimization with levy flight for global optimization. Appl. Soft Comput. 43, 248–261 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayesha Anjum Butt
    • 1
  • Zahoor Ali Khan
    • 2
  • Nadeem Javaid
    • 1
    Email author
  • Annas Chand
    • 3
  • Aisha Fatima
    • 1
  • Muhammad Talha Islam
    • 1
  1. 1.COMSATS University IslamabadIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Computer Information ScienceHigher Colleges of TechnologyFujairahUAE
  3. 3.COMSATS University IslamabadAbbotabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations