Advertisement

Idealization and Romantic Beliefs in Love

  • Victor Karandashev
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses pros and cons of romantic love beliefs, positive and negative aspects of idealization in love. Empirical research of romantic beliefs shows cross-cultural and gender differences in romantic love idealization.

The chapter reviews the variety of romantic love beliefs, the methods, and measures, which researchers employed to study those, and the results that they obtained in their studies using Romantic Beliefs Scale, Hobart Scale, and Knox-Sporakowski scale, among others. The chapter describes in detail (1) the research designs, (2) methods, (3) instruments and measures, (4) samples (including their location, sample size, and other details), and (5) the data and results of studies (including descriptive statistics, such as means and size of correlations).

The details of descriptive statistics help readers understand what the differences in the means for cultural samples are, what is the size of correlations, and other statistics. These details allow readers to make independent judgments about reliability and validity of results.

Keywords

Romantic love Idealization in love Romantic beliefs Romantic beliefs in America Romantic beliefs in Africa Romantic beliefs in the Caribbean Islands Romantic Beliefs Scale Hobart Scale Knox-Sporakowski scale Gender differences in romantic beliefs Cross-cultural studies of romantic love beliefs 

References

  1. Barrón, A., de Paúl, P., Martinez-Iñigo, D., & Yela, C. (1999). Beliefs and romantic myths in Spain. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 2(1), 64–73.Google Scholar
  2. Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Daiuto, A. D., Carels, R. A., Rankin, L. A., & Burnett, C. K. (1996). Cognitions in marriage: The relationship between standards and attributions. Journal of Family Psychology, 10(2), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baucom, D. H., Epstein, N., Rankin, L. A., & Burnett, C. K. (1996). Assessing relationship standards: The inventory of specific relationship standards. Journal of Family Psychology, 10(1), 72–88.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.10.1.72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brickman, P. (1987). Commitment, conflict, and caring. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. de Munck, V. C., Korotayev, A., de Munck, J., & Khaltourina, D. (2011). Cross-cultural analysis of models of romantic love among US residents, Russians, and Lithuanians. Cross-Cultural Research, 45(2), 128–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Munck, V., Korotayev, A., & Khaltourina, D. (2009). A comparative study of the structure of love in the US and Russia: Finding a common core of characteristics and national and gender differences. Ethnology: An International Journal of Cultural and Social Anthropology, 48(4), 337–357.Google Scholar
  7. Dean, D. G. (1964). Romanticism and emotional maturity: A further exploration. Social Forces, 42(3), 298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. D’Hondt, W., & Vandewiele, M. (1983). Attitudes of West African students toward love and marriage. Psychological Reports, 53(2), 615–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dion, K. L., & Dion, K. K. (1973). Correlates of romantic love. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41(1), 51–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein, N., Baucom, D. H., & Rankin, L. A. (1993). Treatment of marital conflict: a cognitive-behavioral approach. Clinical Psychology Review, 13(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher, H. (2004). Why we love: The nature and chemistry of romantic love. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  12. Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love, and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Glenn, N. D. (1991). The recent trend in marital success in the United States. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goode, W. J. (1959). The theoretical importance of love. American Sociological Review, 24, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gross, L. (1944). A belief pattern scale for measuring attitudes toward romanticism. American Sociological Review, 9(5), 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hendrick, S. S., & Hendrick, C. (1992). Romantic love: An interdisciplinary analysis of the complex and elusive nature of love. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Hinkle, D. E., & Sporakowski, M. J. (1975). Attitudes toward love: A reexamination. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37(4), 764–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hobart, C. W. (1958). The incidence of romanticism during courtship. Social Forces, 36, 362–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kephart, W. M. (1967). Some correlates of romantic love. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29(3), 470–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knee, R. (1998). Implicit theories of relationships: assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knox, D. H., & Sporakowski, M. J. (1968). College students attitudes toward love. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 638–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kövecses, Z. (1988). The language of love: The semantics of passion in conversational English. Lewisburg, PA, Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Medora, N. P., Larson, J. H., Hortaçsu, N., & Dave, P. (2002). Perceived attitudes towards romanticism: A cross-cultural study of American, Asian-Indian, and Turkish young adults. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33, 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Munro, B., & Adams, G. (1978a). Correlates of romantic love revisited. Journal of Psychology, 98, 211–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Munro, B., & Adams, G. R. (1978b). Love American style: A test of role structure theory on changes in attitudes toward love. Human Relations, 31(3), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(6), 586–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996a). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(1), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996b). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1155–1181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Omari, T. P. (1963). Role expectation in the courtship situation in Ghana. Social Forces, 42(2), 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Payne, M., & Vandewiele, M. (1987). Attitudes toward love in the Caribbean. Psychological Reports, 60(3), 715–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Philbrick, J. L. (1988). Love African style: A comparison of sex differences in love-attitudes of East African University students. Psychological Reports, 63(3), 913–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Philbrick, J. L., & Opolot, J. A. (1980). Love style: Comparison of African and American attitudes. Psychological Reports, 46, 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Philbrick, J. L., & Stones, C. R. (1988a). Love-attitudes of white South African adolescents. Psychological Reports, 62(1), 17–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Philbrick, J. L., & Stones, C. R. (1988b). Love attitudes in black South Africa: A comparison of school and university students. The Psychological Record, 38(2), 249–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharp, E. A., & Ganong, L. H. (2000). Raising awareness about marital expectations: are unrealistic beliefs changed by integrative teaching? Family Relations, 49(1), 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Simmons, C. H., vom Kolke, A., & Shimizu, H. (1986). Attitudes toward romantic love among American, German, and Japanese students. Journal of Social Psychology, 126(3), 327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simmons, C. H., Wehner, E. A., & Kay, K. A. (1989). Differences in attitudes toward romantic love of French and American college students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129(6), 793–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spanier, G. B. (1972). Romanticism and marital adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 34, 481–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sprecher, S., Aron, A., Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E., & Levitskaya, A. (1994). Love: American style, Russian style, and Japanese style. Personal Relationships, 1, 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sprecher, S., & Metts, S. (1989). Development of the Romantic Beliefs Scale and examination of the effects of gender and gender-role orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sprecher, S., & Toro-Morn, M. (2002). A study of men and women from different sides of earth to determine if men are from Mars and women are from Venus in their beliefs about love and romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 46(5-6), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sternberg, R. J., & Barnes, H. L. (1985). Real and ideal others in romantic relationships: is four a crowd? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1586–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stones, C. R. (1986). Love styles revisited: A cross-national comparison with particular reference to South Africa. Human Relations, 39(4), 379–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stones, C. R. (1992). Love attitudes of White South African and British university students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(5), 609–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stones, C. R., & Philbrick, J. L. (1989). Attitudes toward love among Xhosa university students in South Africa. The Journal of Social Psychology, 129(4), 573–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stones, C. R., & Philbrick, J. L. (1991). Attitudes toward love among members of a small fundamentalist community in South Africa. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(2), 219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Swidler, A. (2001). Talk of love: How culture matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor, S. E., Collins, R. L., Skokan, L. A., & Aspinwall, L. G. (1989). Maintaining positive illusions in the face of negative information: Getting the facts without letting them get to you. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8, 114–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vandewiele, M., & Philbrick, J. L. (1983). Attitudes of Senegalese students toward love. Psychological Reports, 52(3), 915–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor Karandashev
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyAquinas CollegeGrand RapidsUSA

Personalised recommendations