Advertisement

LAWs: Latent Demand for Simulation of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems

  • Agostino G. BruzzoneEmail author
  • Giulio Franzinetti
  • Marina Massei
  • Riccardo Di Matteo
  • Libor Kutej
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11472)

Abstract

This paper provides an overview on the Lethal Autonomous Systems (LAWs) and related critical issues caused by dynamically evolving context. Traditional approaches to evaluate new system development, software review, prototyping and testing are often not really efficient or even not applicable in this LAWs even due to the evolution in terms of social and operational scenarios. Vice versa, it is evident that simulation plays the key role to support evaluation of scenarios considering that is practically the only methodology able to develop and to conduct virtual tests on concepts, general principia, strategic decisions, technology impacts and related implications.

References

  1. 1.
    Bruzzone, A.G., Massei, M., Mazal, I., di Matteo, R., Agresta, M., Maglione, G.L.: Simulation of autonomous systems collaborating in industrial plants for multiple tasks. In: Proceedings of SESDE, Barcelona, September 2017Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruzzone, A.G., Di Bella, P., Di Matteo, R., Massei, M., Reverberi, A., Milano, V.: Joint approach to model hybrid warfare to support multiple players. In: Proceedings of WAMS, Florence, September 2017Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruzzone, A.G.: New challenges & missions for autonomous systems operating in multiple domains within cyber and hybrid warfare scenarios. Invited Speech at Future Forces, Prague, Czech Republic (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruzzone, A.G., Massei, M., Maglione, G.L., Di Matteo, R., Franzinetti, G.: Simulation of manned & autonomous systems for critical infrastructure protection. In: Proceedings of DHSS, Larnaca, Cyprus, September 2016Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruzzone, A.G., Massei, M., Di Matteo, R., Agresta, M., Franzinetti, G., Porro, P.: Modeling, interoperable simulation & serious games as an innovative approach for disaster relief. In: Proceedings of I3M, Larnaca, 26–28 September 2016Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruzzone, A.G., et al.: Human behavior simulation for complex scenarios based on intelligent agents. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Simulation Symposium, SCS, San Diego, April 2014Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bruzzone, A.G.: Intelligent agent-based simulation for supporting operational planning in country reconstruction. Int. J. Simul. Process Model. 8(2–3), 145–151 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bruzzone, A.G., et al.: Virtual framework for testing/experiencing potential of collaborative autonomous systems. In: Proceedings of I/ITSEC, Orlando, FL, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Danielson, P.: Artificial Morality - Virtuous Robots for Virtual Games. Routlege, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gauthier, D.P.: Morality, rational choice and semantic representation. Soc. Philos. Policy 5, 173–221 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gocek, S.A.: What ethical concerns are raised by autonomous weapons systems? 15 October 2018. The Global Dispatches. www.theglobaldispatches.com. Accessed October 2018
  12. 12.
    Haugeland, J.: Artifical Intelligence, the Very Idea. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larm, D.: Expendable remotely piloted vehicles for strategic offensive airpower roles. Air University Maxwell AFB, AL, School of Advanced Airpower Studies (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mead, C.: War Play. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ministry of Defence: Joint Doctrine Publication 0-30.2 Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Ministry of Defence, The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre. UK Government, London (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Oldenquist, A.: The possibility of selfishness. Am. Philos. Q. 17, 25–33 (1980)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scharre, P.: Robotics on the Battlefield Part II: The Coming Swarm, 15 October 2014. CNAS. https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/robotics-on-the-battlefield-part-ii-the-coming-swarm. Accessed October 2018
  19. 19.
    The Economist: Autonomous weapons are a game changer, 25 January 2015. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/special-report/2018/01/25/autonomous-weapons-are-a-game-changer. Accessed October 2018
  20. 20.
    United Nations Office at Geneva: 2018 Group of Governmental Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS), 9–13 April 2018. https://www.unog.ch/80256EE600585943/(httpPages)/7C335E71DFCB29D1C1258243003E8724. Accessed October 2018
  21. 21.
    Vincent, J.: Satya Nadella’s rules for AI are more boring (and relevant) than Asimov’s Three Laws, 29 June 2016. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2016/6/29/12057516/satya-nadella-ai-robot-laws

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Agostino G. Bruzzone
    • 1
    Email author
  • Giulio Franzinetti
    • 2
  • Marina Massei
    • 3
  • Riccardo Di Matteo
    • 4
  • Libor Kutej
    • 5
  1. 1.Simulation Team, DIMEUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly
  2. 2.Lio Tech Ltd.LondonUK
  3. 3.Liophant SimulationSavonaItaly
  4. 4.SIM4Future srlGenoaItaly
  5. 5.University of Defence in BrnoBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations