Advertisement

Continuous Improvement in an Industrial Unit of the Wood Industry Through Kanban

  • Flávia C. S. Guia
  • Radu Godina
  • João C. O. MatiasEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 281)

Abstract

Nowadays, in order to achieve manufacturing excellence and to ensure customer satisfaction in a competitive marketplace, companies are increasingly looking for simple techniques to bring them vital gains in terms of time and money. A powerful tool to minimize average production time and to save costs is the Kanban system, which not only reduces stock levels but also ensures the efficiency of the workplace. In this investigation, there is a case study of a small company in the wood industry where the Kanban system was implemented. This case shows how such a simple tool has motivated a team to create a system of continuous improvement.

Keywords

Kanban system Continuous improvement Lean manufacturing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the research unit on Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policy (project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006939), funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020—POCI and by national funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia. Radu Godina would like to acknowledge financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (UID/EMS/00667/2019).

References

  1. 1.
    Bayraktar, E., Jothishankar, M.C., Tatoglu, E., Wu, T.: Evolution of operations management: past, present and future. Manag. Res. News. 30, 843–871 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dombrowski, U., Mielke, T.: Lean leadership—fundamental principles and their application. Procedia CIRP. 7, 569–574 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kiran, D.R.: Chapter 25—Lean Management. In: Total Quality Management. pp. 363–372. Butterworth-Heinemann (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Béndek, P.: Strategies of TPS/Lean Implementation. In: Beyond Lean. pp. 21–56. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Medinilla, Á.: Why and How Kaizen Fails. In: Agile Kaizen. pp. 21–36. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Watanabe, S.: International Transferability and Adaptability. In: Japanese Management for a Globalized World. pp. 137–173. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suzaki, K.: Gestão de operações Lean. LeanOp Press (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holtskog, H.: Continuous improvement beyond the lean understanding. Procedia CIRP. 7, 575–579 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rahman, N.A.A., Sharif, S.M., Esa, M.M.: Lean manufacturing case study with Kanban system implementation. Procedia Econ. Finance. 7, 174–180 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Faccio, M., Gamberi, M., Persona, A.: Kanban number optimisation in a supermarket warehouse feeding a mixed-model assembly system. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51, 2997–3017 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al-Baik, O., Miller, J.: The Kanban approach, between agility and leanness: a systematic review. Empir. Softw. Eng. 20, 1861–1897 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Piplani, R., Wei, A., Ang, H.: Performance comparison of multiple product Kanban control systems. Int. J. Prod. Res. 7543, 0 (2017)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Naufal, A., Jaffar, A., Yussof, N., Hayati, N.: Development of Kanban system at local manufacturing company in Malaysia case study. Procedia Eng. 41, 1721–1726 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kouri, I.A., Salmimaa, T.J., Vilpola, I.H.: The principles and planning process of an electronic Kanban system. In: Novel Algorithms and Techniques in Telecommunications, Automation and Industrial Electronics. pp. 99–104 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ahmad, M.O., Markkula, J., Oivo, M.: Insights into the perceived benefits of Kanban in software companies: Practitioners’ views. In: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. pp. 156–168. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Line, A.: An optimal Kanban system in a multi-stage, mixed-model assebly line. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 19, 36–49 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xanthopoulos, A.S., Ioannidis, S., Koulouriotis, D.E.: Optimal adaptive Kanban-type production control. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 97, 2887–2905 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daniel, B., Kumar, V., Omar, N.: Postgraduate conception of research methodology: implications for learning and teaching. Int. J. Res. Method Educ. 41, 220–236 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farber, N.K.: Conducting qualitative research: a practical guide for school counselors. Prof. Sch. Couns. 9, 367–375 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arellano, R., Balcazar, F., Suarez, S., Alvarado, F.: A participatory action research method in a rural community of Mexico. Univ. Psychol. 14, 1197–1208 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hama Kareem, J.A., Hama Amin, O.A.Q.: Ethical and psychological factors in 5S and total productive maintenance. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 10, 444–475 (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Filip, F.C., Marascu-Klein, V.: The 5S lean method as a tool of industrial management performances. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 95, 1–6 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jiménez, M., Romero, L., Domínguez, M., Espinosa, M., del, M.: 5S methodology implementation in the laboratories of an industrial engineering university school. Saf. Sci. 78, 163–172 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Flávia C. S. Guia
    • 1
  • Radu Godina
    • 2
  • João C. O. Matias
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.DEGEITUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.Research and Development Unit in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (UNIDEMI), Faculty of Science and Technology (FCT), Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversidade NOVA de LisboaCaparicaPortugal
  3. 3.GOVCOPPUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations