Advertisement

The Self and the Other: The Pedagogy of I Am Cait

  • Ava Laure ParsemainEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Entertainment Industries book series (PAEI)

Abstract

Shortly after Caitlyn Jenner came out as a transwoman, E! launched I Am Cait—a reality series documenting her gender transition. A spin-off of Keeping Up with the Kardashians, the programme differentiates itself from its parent-series by tackling trans issues in a didactic manner. This chapter explores I Am Cait as an educational text and explains how it uses the features of reality TV as pedagogical tools. Like many reality series, it stresses ordinariness and authenticity, encouraging viewers to emotionally relate to the cast of transwomen. This chapter also shows how the text distances itself from Jenner’s personal opinions and presents different views on transgenderism and queerness. By doing so, it encourages critical thinking, discussion and debate, and promotes ethics as respectful engagement with difference.

References

  1. ABC. (1978–). 20/20 [Television Series]. Los Angeles, CA: David Sloan.Google Scholar
  2. ABC. (1994–1998). Ellen [Television Series]. Los Angeles, CA: Neal Marlens, Carol Black & David S. Rosenthal.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, S. (2016). Interview with Judith Butler. Sexualities, 0(0), 1–11.Google Scholar
  4. Amatangelo, A. (2015). “Keeping up with the Kardashians: About Bruce”: TV review. Retrieved from http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/keeping-up-kardashians-bruce-tv-796447
  5. Andrejevic, M. (2004). Reality TV: The work of being watched. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Ang, K. (2015). The very “real” part of the most hyped-reality show of the year. Retrieved from http://www.mamamia.com.au/i-am-cait-review-2/
  7. Biressi, A., & Nunn, H. (2005). Reality TV: Realism and revelation. London: Wallflower.Google Scholar
  8. Buckingham, D., & Bragg, S. (2004). Young people, sex and the media: The facts of life. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Capuzza, J. C., & Spencer, L. G. (2017). Regressing, progressing, or transgressing on the small screen? Transgender characters on U.S. scripted television series. Communication Quarterly, 65(2), 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CBS. (2000–). Survivor [Television Series]. New York, NY: Charlie Parsons.Google Scholar
  11. Channel 4. (2000–). Big Brother [Television Series]. London: John de Mol.Google Scholar
  12. Corner, J. (2002). Performing the real: Documentary diversions. Television & New Media, 3(3), 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Currah, P., & Stryker, S. (2015). Introduction. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 2(1), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2848859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deery, J. (2015). Reality TV. Cambridge: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Dovey, J. (1998). Freakshow: First person media and factual television. Chicago, IL: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  16. E! (2007–). Keeping up with the Kardashians [Television Series]. Los Angeles, CA: Ryan Seacrest.Google Scholar
  17. E! (2015–2016). I Am Cait [Television Series]. Los Angeles, CA: Gil Goldschein.Google Scholar
  18. Ellis, J. (2000). Seeing things: Television in the age of uncertainty. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  19. Gilbert, M. A. (2014). Cross-dresser. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(1–2), 65–67.  https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2399632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. GLAAD. (2017). Where we are on TV. Retrieved from http://glaad.org/files/WWAT/WWAT_GLAAD_2017-2018.pdf
  21. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of the self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  22. Harris, S. (2015). “I Am Cait” might just change how we see reality TV. Retrieved from http://www.spookmagazine.com/i-am-cait-might-just-change-how-we-see-reality-tv/
  23. Hawkins, G. (2001). The ethics of television. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(4), 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heller, D. (2014). Wrecked programming celesbian reality. In B. R. Weber (Ed.), Reality gendervision: Sexuality and gender on transatlantic reality television (pp. 123–146). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hill, A. (2005). Reality TV: Audiences and popular factual television. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Horak, L. (2014). Trans on YouTube: Intimacy, visibility, temporality. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(4), 572–585.  https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2815255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jenner, C. [@Caitlyn_Jenner]. (2015, June 1). I’m so happy after such a long struggle to be living my true self. Welcome to the world Caitlyn. Can’t wait for you to get to know her/me [Tweet]. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/caitlyn_jenner/status/605407919820013568?lang=en
  28. Kama, A. (2002). The quest for inclusion: Jewish-Israeli gay men’s perceptions of gays in the media. Feminist Media Studies, 2(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kavka, M. (2014). Reality TV and the gendered politics of flaunting. In B. R. Weber (Ed.), Reality gendervision: Sexuality and gender on transatlantic reality television (pp. 54–95). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kilborn, R. (1994). “How real can you get?”: Recent developments in “reality” television. European Journal of Communication, 9(4), 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kilborn, R. (1998). Shaping the real: Democratization and commodification in UK factual broadcasting. European Journal of Communication, 13(2), 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koch-Rein, A. (2014). Monster. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(1–2), 134–135.  https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2399821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kohan, J. (2013). “Orange” Creator Jenji Kohan: “Piper was my Trojan horse.”, Fresh Air. Philadelphia, PA: Terry Gross.Google Scholar
  34. Krell, E. C. (2017). Is transmisogyny killing trans women of color?: Black trans feminisms and the exigencies of white femininity. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 4(2), 226–242.  https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-3815033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Landers, R. (1999). Whiteys Like Us [Film]. Mitchell, ACT: Ronin Films.Google Scholar
  36. Leaker, C. (2007). All my (queer) children: Disrupting daytime desire in Pine Valley. In T. Peele (Ed.), Queer popular culture: Literature, media, film, and television (pp. 41–55). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lumby, C. (2003). Real appeal: The ethics of reality TV. In C. Lumby & E. Probyn (Eds.), Remote control: New media new ethics (pp. 11–24). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lury, K. (2005). Interpreting television. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  39. Marwick, A., & boyd, d. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17(2), 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCarthy, A. (2001). Ellen: Making queer television history. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 7(4), 593–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCarthy, E. D. (2009). Emotional performances as dramas of authenticity. In P. Vannini & J. P. Williams (Eds.), Authenticity in culture, self, and society. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Monaco, J. (2000). How to read a film: The world of movies, media, and multimedia: Language, history, theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Montgomery, M. (2001). Defining “authentic talk”. Discourse Studies, 3(4), 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moore, C. (2008). Resisting, reiterating, and dancing through: The swinging closet doors of Ellen DeGeneres’s televised personalities. In R. Beirne (Ed.), Televising queer women: A reader (pp. 17–31). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. NBC/MTV. (2001–). Fear Factor [Television Series]. New York, NY: David A. Hurwitz.Google Scholar
  46. Parsemain, A. (2016). Do critical viewers learn from television? Participations, 13(1), 71–93.Google Scholar
  47. PBS. (1973). An American Family [Television Series]. Arlington County, VA: Craig Gilbert.Google Scholar
  48. Phillips, J. (2006). Transgender on screen. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Phillips, R. (2014). Abjection. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(1–2), 19–21.  https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-2399470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pramaggiore, M., & Negra, D. (2014). Keeping up with the aspirations commercial family values and the Kardashian brand. In B. R. Weber (Ed.), Reality gendervision: Sexuality and gender on transatlantic reality television (pp. 76–96). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Roscoe, J. (2001). Big Brother Australia: Performing the “real” twenty-four-seven. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(4), 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scheck, F. (2015). I Am Cait: TV review. Retrieved from http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/i-am-cait-tv-review-810338
  53. Showtime. (2010–2012). The Real L Word [Television Series]. Los Angeles, CA: Ilene Chaiken.Google Scholar
  54. Turner, G. (2010). Ordinary people and the media: The demotic turn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. VanDerWerff, T. (2015). I Am Cait could be great TV. Instead, it’s just a reality show. Retrieved from http://www.vox.com/2015/7/27/9049261/i-am-cait-caitlyn-jenner
  56. Villarejo, A. (2014). Ethereal queer: Television, historicity, desire. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Weber, B. (2014). Reality Gendervision: Sexuality and gender on transatlantic reality television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations