Advertisement

Which Factors Influence International Research Collaboration in Africa?

  • Hugo ConfrariaEmail author
  • Jaco Blanckenberg
  • Charl Swart
Chapter
Part of the Sustainable Development Goals Series book series (SDGS)

Abstract

It is commonly accepted that international research collaboration improves scientists’ abilities and performance. In this chapter, we investigate the question: what are the characteristics of African researchers who collaborate more often with international partners?. Data are taken from Web of Science and a survey that collected detailed information about the individual characteristics of 2954 African researchers in 42 African countries. We use descriptive statistics and an econometric model to discern the characteristics that are associated with higher levels of collaboration with researchers outside Africa. Overall, our results suggest that, on average, researchers who did their doctoral studies outside of Africa, had the opportunity to move abroad (over the past 3 years) and received a higher share of international funding (over the past 3 years), are more likely to collaborate more frequently with researchers outside of Africa. In our conclusions, we discuss that beyond increasing the availability of mobility scholarships and the amount of research funding for African scientists, policymakers and international organisations should also think in incentives to keep long-term research interactions and try to avoid unequal partnerships.

Keywords

Research collaboration African science Scientific capabilities Research policy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Robin Cowan, Catherine Beaudry and Johann Mouton for their contributions. The authors also thank Rodrigo Costas for providing valuable data. This article also benefited from comments made by the participants of the book workshop on ‘Africa and Sustainable Development Goals’ (Cape Town) and Globelics 2018 conference (Accra). The authors acknowledge support from the Young Scientists in Africa project funded by Robert Bosch Stiftung and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC). Any remaining error is the authors.

References

  1. Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Murgia G (2013) Gender differences in research collaboration. J Inf 7(4):811–822Google Scholar
  2. Adams J, Gurney K, Hook D, Leydesdorff L (2013) International collaboration clusters in Africa. Scientometrics 98(1):547–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen TD, Eby LT, Poteet ML, Lentz E, Lima L (2004) Career benefits associated with mentoring for proteges: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 89(1):127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. African Observatory of Science, Technology and Innovation (AOSTI) (2014) Assessment of scientific production in the African Union Member States 2005–2010. http://aosti.org/index.php/publi/66-assessment-of-scientific-production-in-the-african-union-member-states-2005-2010. Accessed 9 April 2015
  5. Arvanitis R, Gaillard J (2014) Research collaboration between Europe and Latin America: mapping and understanding partnership. Editions des archives contemporaines. http://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010061605. Accessed 2 Nov 2017
  6. Beaver DD (2001) Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present, and future. Scientometrics 52(3):365–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boshoff N (2009) Neo-colonialism and research collaboration in Central Africa. Scientometrics 81(2):413–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bozeman B, Corley E (2004) Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Res Policy 33(4):599–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carbonnier G, Kontinen T (2014) North-South research partnership: academia meets development? http://www.eadi.org/typo3/fileadmin/Documents/Publications/EADI_Policy_Paper/EADI_policy_paper_Carbonnier_Kontinen_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 30 March 2017
  10. Defazio D, Lockett A, Wright M (2009) Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity: evidence from the EU framework program. Res Policy 38(2):293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duque RB, Ynalvez M, Sooryamoorthy R, Mbatia P, Dzorgbo D-BS, Shrum W (2005) Collaboration paradox. Soc Stud Sci 35(5):755–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans SC, Ng T, DuBois DL (2008) Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals. J Vocat Behav 72(2):254–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friesenhahn I, Beaudry C (2014) Global state of young scientists: project report and recommendations. http://www.globalyoungacademy.net/projects/glosys-1/gya-glosys-report-webversion. Accessed 27 Nov 2018
  14. Gaillard JF (1994) North-South research partnership: is collaboration possible between unequal partners? Knowl Policy 7(2):31–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaillard J (2003) Overcoming the scientific generation gap in Africa: an urgent priority. Interdisc Sci Rev 28(1):15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaye I, Allieu A, Osaliya R, Banda B, Gnegne Y (2015). Africa regional report on the sustainable development goals. Addis Ababa, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar
  17. Geffers J, Beaudry C, Yang HC, Huang F, Phanraksa O, Dominik M, Lin YC, Huang MC, Komai S, Lorimer K, Piyawattanametha W (2017) Global state of young scientists (GloSYS) in ASEAN—creativity and innovation of young scientists in ASEAN. Global Young Academy, SaaleGoogle Scholar
  18. Greene WH (2012) Econometric analysis. Pearson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Guns R, Wang L (2017) Detecting the emergence of new scientific collaboration links in Africa: a comparison of expected and realized collaboration intensities. J Inf 11(3):892–903Google Scholar
  20. Hicks D, Wouters P, Waltman L, de Rijcke S, Rafols I (2015) Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520(7548):429–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonkers K, Tijssen R (2008) Chinese researchers returning home: impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics 77(2):309–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Katz JS, Martin BR (1997) What is research collaboration? Res Policy 26(1):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laudel G (2002) What do we measure by co-authorships? Res Eval 11(1):3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee S, Bozeman B (2005) The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Soc Stud Sci 35(5):673–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marmolejo-Leyva R, Perez-Angon MA, Russell JM (2015) Mobility and international collaboration: case of the Mexican scientific diaspora. PLoS ONE 10(6):e0126720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marx W, Bornmann L (2014) On the causes of subject-specific citation rates in Web of Science. Scientometrics 102(2):1823–1827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mêgnigbêto E (2013) International collaboration in scientific publishing: the case of West Africa (2001–2010). Scientometrics 96(3):761–783.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0963-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Müller M, Cowan R, Barnard H (2018) On the value of foreign PhDs in the developing world: training versus selection effects in the case of South Africa. Res Policy 47(5):886–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Narváez-Berthelemot N, Russell JM, Arvanitis R, Waast R, Gaillard J (2002) Science in Africa: an overview of mainstream scientific output. Scientometrics 54(2):229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Onyancha OB, Maluleka JR (2011) Knowledge production through collaborative research in sub-Saharan Africa: how much do countries contribute to each other’s knowledge output and citation impact? Scientometrics 87(2):315–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Scellato G, Franzoni C, Stephan P (2015) Migrant scientists and international networks. Res Policy 44(1):108–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tijssen RJW (2007) Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: new analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators. Scientometrics 71(2):303–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Toivanen H, Ponomariov B (2011) African regional innovation systems: bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns 2005–2009. Scientometrics 88(2):471–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2015) UNESCO science report: towards 2030. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  35. Wagner CS, Brahmakulam IT, Jackson BA, Wong A, Yoda T (2001) Science & technology collaboration. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1357z0.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2015
  36. Wang W, Yu S, Bekele TM, Kong X, Xia F (2017) Scientific collaboration patterns vary with scholars’ academic ages. Scientometrics 112(1):329–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zdravkovic M, Chiwona-Karltun L, Zink E (2016) Experiences and perceptions of South-South and North-South scientific collaboration of mathematicians, physicists and chemists from five southern African universities. Scientometrics 108(2):717–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugo Confraria
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jaco Blanckenberg
    • 3
  • Charl Swart
    • 3
  1. 1.SPRU, University of SussexBrightonUK
  2. 2.UNU-MERIT, Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.CREST/SciSTIP, Stellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations