Advertisement

What We Are Left With

  • Stephen FroshEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Psychosocial book series (STIP)

Abstract

If postmemory relates to how we might remain in thrall to previous generations, and indeed never escape the weight of our own and others’ histories, then a question arises about how anything ever ends. Does suffering endlessly recycle itself? In the words of Suzanne Hommel (in Miller 2011), quoted in Chap.  6, is it the case that whatever happens to one, and whatever one inherits from one’s predecessors, ‘that’s something you’ll cope with all your life?’ The issue here is of what it might mean to bring something intense to an end; and related to this – perhaps even determining the possibility of ever ending something fully – is the question of what we are left with afterwards. One simple fact of psychoanalysis is that we are never free of our conscious or unconscious memories; nor should we really wish to be so, because they give us depth and they focus our subjectivity in relation to the various interpersonal and social features of our lives. Without some legacy from previous generations, we may feel freer, but would we not also be emptier? Without being ‘haunted’ by the past, we would lose the benevolent as well as the troubling ghosts; and with this we would lose the sense of ‘identity’ in the way Freud discusses it, for instance in Moses and Monotheism (1939), where he traces the links across generations derived from the sense of a shared history of trauma. More softly and less tendentiously, perhaps, we continue to connect with these histories as ways of locating ourselves; but can we do so without being in a permanent state of mourning for what we have lost?

References

  1. Abraham, N., & Torok, M. (1976). The Wolf Man’s Magic Word: A Cryptonomy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative and History. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Diller, J. (1991). Freud’s Jewish Identity: A Case Study in the Impact of Ethnicity. London: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
  5. Evans, D. (1996). An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Ferenczi, S. (1927). The Problem of the Termination of the Analysis. In J. Borossa (Ed.), Sándor Ferenczi: Selected Writings. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1979). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  8. Freud, S. (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume IV (1900): The Interpretation of Dreams (First Part) (pp. ix–627). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  9. Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and Melancholia. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIV (1914–1916): On the History of the Psycho-Analytic Movement, Papers on Metapsychology and Other Works (pp. 237–258). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIX (1923–1925): The Ego and the Id and Other Works (pp. 1–66). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and Its Discontents. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XXI (1927–1931): The Future of an Illusion, Civilization and Its Discontents, and Other Works (pp. 57–146). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, S. (1939). Moses and Monotheism. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XXIII (1937–1939): Moses and Monotheism, an Outline of Psycho-Analysis and Other Works (pp. 1–138). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  13. Frosh, S. (2013). Hauntings: Psychoanalysis and Ghostly Transmissions. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gellner, E. (1992). Psychoanalysis, Social Role and Testability. In W. Dryden & C. Feltham (Eds.), Psychotherapy and Its Discontents. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gunn, D. (2002). Wool-Gathering, or How I Ended Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Klein, M. (1950). On the Criteria for the Termination of a Psycho-Analysis. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 31, 78–80.Google Scholar
  17. Lacan, J. (1959–60). The Ethics of Psychoanalysis (Seminar VII). London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar
  18. Lacan, J. (1969–70). The Other Side of Psychoanalysis (Seminar XVII). New York: Norton, 2007.Google Scholar
  19. Leys, R. (2000). Trauma: A Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Luckhurst, R. (2008). The Trauma Question. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, G. (2011). Rendez-Vous Chez Lacan. Paris: Editions Montparnasse.Google Scholar
  22. Rosen, C. (1976). Schoenberg. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  23. Sharpe, C. (2016). In the Wake: On Blackness and Being. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wieseltier, L. (1998). Kaddish. New York: Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena – A Study of the First Not-Me Possession. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34, 89–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Žižek, S. (1993). Tarrying with the Negative. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Žižek, S. (2000). Melancholy and the Act. Critical Inquiry, 26, 657–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Žižek, S. (2006). How to Read Lacan. London: Granta.Google Scholar
  29. Žižek, S. (2014). Staging Feminine Hysteria: Schoenberg’s Erwartung. In M. Flisfeder & L. Willis (Eds.), Žižek and Media Studies: A Reader. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychosocial Studies BirkbeckUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations