Advertisement

Preliminary Considerations About the Historicity of the Capital

  • Alain HerscoviciEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

From a methodological and epistemological perspective, the debate on the nature of capital is fundamental, with respect to the definition of the object of Economic Science, to the aggregate causality relations and to the design of empiric tools (Felipe and McCombie 2005).

References

  1. Arnoux, Pierre, et Karine Chemla. 1992. Systèmes dynamiques et théorie ergodique. In Chaos et déterminisme, Sous la direction de A. Dahan Dalmedico, J. L. Chabert, and K. Chemla. Paris: Edition Du Seuil.Google Scholar
  2. Aron, R. 1989. Leçons surL’Histoire.Cours du Collège de France. Paris: Éditions du Fallois.Google Scholar
  3. Arrow, Kenneth J. 1974. Limited Knowledge and Economic Analysis. American Economic Review, American Economic Association 64 (1) (March): 1–10.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1986. Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System. The Journal of Business 59 (4): 385–399.Google Scholar
  5. Bartoli, Henri. 1991. L’Economie Multidimensionnelle. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  6. Baumol, W.J., and J. Benhabib. 1989. Chaos: Significance, Mechanism, and Economic Applications. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (1) (Winter 1989): 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaug, Mark. 1992. The Methodology of Economics or How Economists Explain, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bortkiewicz, Ladislauss. 1959. Essai de rectification de la construction théorique fondamentale de Marx dans le troisième livre du Capital. Cahiers de l’ISEA. Paris.Google Scholar
  9. Braudel, Fernand. 1979. Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme XVe-XVIIIème siècle. 2. Les jeux de l’échange. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 1985. La dynamique du capitalisme. Paris: Champs Flammarion.Google Scholar
  11. Chick, Victoria. 2004. On Open Systems. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 24 (1), janeiro-março, São Paulo, 3–16.Google Scholar
  12. Chick, V., and S. Dow. 2001. Formalism, Logic and Reality: A Keynesian Analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics 25: 705–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dahan Dalmenico, A. 1992. Le déterminisme de Pierre Simon Laplace et le déterminisme aujourd’hui. In Chaos et Déterminisme, ed. A. Dahan Dalmenico, J.L. Chabert, and K. Chemla, 371–406. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  14. Dow Sheila, C. 1985. Macroeconomic Thought. A Methodological Approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Dray, W. 1957. Laws and Explanations in History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Duménil, Gérard. 1980. De la valeur aux prix de production. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  17. Duménil, G., and D. Lévy. 1987. The Dynamics of Competition: A Restoration of the Classical Analysis. Cambridge Journal of Economics 11: 133–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2000. Déséquilibre et stabilité: proportions et dimension, non published.Google Scholar
  19. Dumont, Louis. 1985. Homos aequalis. Genèse et épanouissement de l’idéologie économique. Paris: NRF, Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar
  20. Felipe Jesus, McCombie, J.S.L. 2005. How Sound are the Foundations of the Aggregate Production Function? Eastern Economic Journal 31(3) (Summer 2005): 467–488.Google Scholar
  21. Fermi, Enrico. 1996. Thermodynamics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  22. Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1971. Enthropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodwin, Richard M. 1992. Chaotic Economic Dynamics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gordon, R. 2000. Does the New Economy Measure Up to the Great Innovations of the Past. Journal of Economic Perspective 4 (14): 49–74.Google Scholar
  25. Harris, Donald J. 1978. Capital Accumulation and Income Distribution. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 1988. On the Classical Theory of Competition. Cambridge Journal of Economics 12 (1) (March): 139–167.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hempel, C.G. 1942. The Function of General Laws in History. The Journal of Philosophy 39 (2) (January 15), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Herscovici, Alain. 2002. Dinâmica Macroeconômica: uma interpretação a partir de Marx e de Keynes. São Paulo: EDUC/EDUFES.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2006. O modelo de Harrod: natureza das expectativas de longo prazo, instabilidade e não linearidade. Economia e Sociedade, Campinas 15 (26): 29–55.Google Scholar
  30. Hicks, J.R. 1979. Causality in Economics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  31. Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 1998. The Approach of Institutional Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 36 (1): 166–192.Google Scholar
  32. Israël, Giorgio. 1992. L’histoire du déterminisme et ses rencontres avec les mathématiques. In Chaos et Déterminisme, ed. A. Dahan Dalmenico, J.L. Chabert, and K. Chemla, 249–273. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  33. Kaldor, Nicholas. 1934. Alternative Theories of Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies 23 (2) (1955–1956): 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirman, Alan. 1998. Information et prix. In L’Economie de l’information, sous la direction de Pascal Petit. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  35. Kregel, J.A. 1976. Economic Methodology in the Face of Uncertainty: The Modelling Methods of Keynes and the Post-Keynesians. The Economic Journal 86 (junho): 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ———. 1980. Markets and Institutions as Features of a Capitalistic Production System. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics III (1) (Fall): 32–48.Google Scholar
  37. Lipietz, Alain. 1983. Le monde enchanté. De la valeur à l’emvol inflationniste. Paris: La Découverte/Maspéro.Google Scholar
  38. Lucas, Robert E. 1975. Equilibrium Model of the Business Cycle. Journal of Political Economy 83 (6) (December): 1113–1144.Google Scholar
  39. Marx, Karl. 1976. Le Capital, Critique de l’économie politique, Paris: Editions Sociales, Livre III.Google Scholar
  40. Mauss, Marcel. 1923–1924. Essai sur le don. In l’année sociologique, tome I, Paris.Google Scholar
  41. Morishima, Michio, and George Catephores. 1980 [1978]. Valeur, explotation et croissance. Paris: Économica.Google Scholar
  42. Orléan, André. 2011. Orléan André. L’empire de la valeur. Refonder l’Économie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  43. Passet, René. 1979. L’économique et le vivant. Paris: Petite Bilbiothèque Payot.Google Scholar
  44. Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty First Century. Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Polanyi, Karl. 1992 [1944]. The Great Transformation, La Grande Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  46. Popper, Karl. 1988. Misère de l’historicisme. Paris: Presses Pocket.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 1992 [1959]. A lógica da pesquisa científica. São Paulo: Editora Cultrix.Google Scholar
  48. Prigogine, Ilya. 1996. La fin des certitudes. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  49. Prigogine, I., and I. Stengers. 1984. Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  50. Ricardo, David. 1821. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, 3rd ed. Ontario: Batoche Book, 2001.Google Scholar
  51. Ruelle, David. 1993. Acaso e Caos. São Paulo: Editora UNESP.Google Scholar
  52. Say, Jean-Baptiste. 1972. Traité d’ Economie Politique. Paris: Calman-Lévy.Google Scholar
  53. Setterfield, M. 1998. History Versus Equilibrium: Nicholas Kaldor on Historical Time and Economic Theory. Cambridge Journal of Economics 22: 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sims, Christopher A. 1980. Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica 48 (1) (January): 1–48, Published by: The Econometric Society.Google Scholar
  55. Sinaï, Yakov G. 1992. L’aléatoire du non-aléatoire. In Chaos et déterminisme, Sous la direction de A. Dahan Dalmedico, J. L. Chabert, and K. Chemla, Paris: Edition Du Seuil.Google Scholar
  56. Solow, R.M. 1956. A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Steedman, Ian. 1984. Natural Prices, Different Profit Rates and the Classical Competitive Process. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 52 (2): 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vercelli, Alessandro. 1985. Keynes, Schumpeter, Marx and the Structural Instability of Capitalism. In L’hétérodoxie dans la pensée économique, ed. G. Deleplace, P. Maurisson org., Cahiers d’Economie Politique, Anthropos, Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. ———. 1991. Methodological Foundations of Macroeconomics: Keynes After. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. ———. 1999. The Case for a Non Reductionist Macroeconomics: A Long Run Perspective. Dipartimento de Economia Política, Universitá di Siena, não publicado.Google Scholar
  61. Winternitz, J. 1948. Values and Prices: A Solution of the So-Called Transformation Problem. Economic Journal 58: 276–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Federal do Espírito SantoVitóriaBrazil

Personalised recommendations