Social and Economic Conditions and Firm Growth

  • Fadil Sahiti


Firms operate in particular social contexts, characterized by the national, social and economic institutions, which influence the social conditions of innovative activity. Governance institutions have an effect on strategic control, employment institutions influence organizational integration and investment institutions shape financial commitment. This chapter examines whether these social and economic factors matter for the emergence of innovative firms in a less-developed economy context. This is an important aspect since the social conditions are variables that can be influenced by government policies and managers.


  1. Almor, T. (2006). Conceptualizing path of growth for the born global firms. Paper presented at the ACCS Annual Conference, Berlin.Google Scholar
  2. Almor, T., & Hashai, N. (2004). Competitive advantage and strategic configuration of knowledge-intensive small and medium sized multinationals: A modified resource based view. Journal of International Management, 10(4), 479–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23, 495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderton, B. (1999). UK trade performance and the role of product quality, innovation and hysteresis: Some preliminary results. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 46, 570–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Austin, J. T., Yaffee, R. A., & Hinkle, D. E. (1992). Logistic regression for research in higher education. Handbook of Theory and Research, 8, 379–410.Google Scholar
  6. Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 909–924.Google Scholar
  7. Ayyagari, M., Thorsten, B., & Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2007). Small and medium enterprises across the globe: A new database. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 415–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (2001). Why some firms export? (NBER Working Paper No. 8349). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  9. Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2010). Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bloom, N., Schweiger, H., & Van Reenen, J. (2011). The land that lean manufacturing forgot? Management practices in transition countries (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series No. 17231). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. Google Scholar
  11. BSCK. (2012). Entrepreneurship and small business development in Kosovo: Research report.
  12. Cabrera, A. F. (1994). Logistic regression analysis in higher education: An applied perspective. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 10, 225–256.Google Scholar
  13. Carlino, G., & Hunt, R. (2009). What explains the quantity and quality of local inventive activity? In G. Burtless & J. R. Pack (Eds.), Brookings-Wharton papers on urban affairs. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  14. Central Bank of Kosovo. (2017). Annual report 2017. Retrieved from
  15. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. EBRD. (2013). Commercial Laws of Kosovo, an assessment by EBRD. Accessed 22 March 2014.
  17. European Commission. (2018). Kosovo 2018 report. Commission staff working document. Strasburg.
  18. Gruber, M. (2007). Uncovering the value of planning in new venture creation: A process and contingency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(6), 782–807.Google Scholar
  19. Hosmer, D. W., Jr., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Janz, B. D., Colquitt, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (1997). Knowledge worker team effectiveness: The role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables. Personnel Psychology, 50, 877–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, M. V. (2001). First steps in internationalisation: Concepts and evidence from a sample of small high-technology firms. Journal of International Management, 7(3), 191–210.Google Scholar
  22. Koch, M. J., & McGrath, R. G. (1996). Improving labour productivity: Human resource management policies do matter. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawton Smith, H., & Dickson, K. (2003). Critical factors in inter-firm collaboration. International Journal of Technology Management, 25(1/2), 34–50.Google Scholar
  24. Lazonick, W. (2012). The innovative enterprise and the developmental state: Toward an economics of organizational success. Paper prepared for the annual conference of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, Breton Woods, NH, 8–11 April 2011, and revised for the conference on Finance, Business Models, and Sustainable Prosperity, Ford Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Lazonick, W. (2013). The theory of innovative enterprise: Methodology, ideology, and institutions. In J. K. Moudud, C. Bina, & P. L. Mason (Eds.), Alternative theories of competition: Challenges to the orthodoxy (pp. 127–159). London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  26. Lazonick, W. H., Mazzucato, M., & Tulum, Ì. (2013). Apple’s changing business model: What should the world’s richest company do with all those profits? Accounting Forum, 37, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mosakowski, E. (1998). Entrepreneurial resources, organizational choices, and competitive outcomes. Organization Science, 9(6), 625–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD. (2011). Skills for innovation and research (p. 96). Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. OECD. (2013a, March). Assessment of the Kosovo innovation system (RCI Project Paper). OECD Development.Google Scholar
  30. OECD. (2013b). Skills development and training in SMEs. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. OECD/Eurostat. (2005). Oslo manual, guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  32. Scheepers, M. J., Hough, J., & Bloom, J. Z. (2008). Nurturing the corporate entrepreneurship capability. Southern African Business Review, 12(3), 50–75.Google Scholar
  33. Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48, 154–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. World Bank. (2010). BEEPS At-A-Glance 2008 Kosovo, Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS IV). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  35. World Bank. (2013). BEEPS 2013, Kosovo, Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS IV). Washington, DC: World Bank.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fadil Sahiti
    • 1
  1. 1.Rochester Institute of Technology KosovoPrishtinëKosovo

Personalised recommendations