Modeling of Articular Cartilage with Goal of Early Osteoarthritis Extraction Based on Local Fuzzy Thresholding Driven by Fuzzy C-Means Clustering

  • Jan KubicekEmail author
  • Alice Krestanova
  • Marek Penhaker
  • Martin Augustynek
  • Martin Cerny
  • David Oczka
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11432)


One of the routine tasks in the Orthopedics practice is the articular cartilage assessment. Proper cartilage assessment includes a precise localization, and recognition of spots indicating the cartilage loss caused by the osteoarthritis. Unfortunately, such tasks are performed manually, without the SW feedback, which leads to various clinical outputs based on the physician’s experience. Based on such facts, a development of the fully automatic systems bringing automatic modeling and classification of the cartilage is clinically very important. In our paper we have proposed a local thresholding multiregional segmentation method for the cartilage segmentation from the MR (Magnetic Resonance) images. In our approach, an optimal configuration of the fuzzy triangular sets is driven by the FCM clustering to obtain an optimal segmentation model based on the thresholding. We have verified the proposed model on a sample of the 200 MR image records containing the early osteoarthritis signs.


Articular cartilage Image segmentation FCM MR Local thresholding 



The work and the contributions were supported by the project SV4508811/2101 Biomedical Engineering Systems XIV’. This study was also supported by the research project The Czech Science Foundation (GACR) 2017 No. 17-03037S Investment evaluation of medical device development run at the Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. This study was supported by the research project The Czech Science Foundation (TACR) ETA No. TL01000302 Medical Devices development as an effective investment for public and private entities.


  1. 1.
    Kubicek, J., Penhaker, M., Augustynek, M., Cerny, M., Oczka, D.: Multiregional soft segmentation driven by modified ABC algorithm and completed by spatial aggregation: volumetric, spatial modelling and features extraction of articular cartilage early loss. In: Nguyen, N.T., Hoang, D.H., Hong, T.-P., Pham, H., Trawiński, B. (eds.) ACIIDS 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10752, pp. 385–394. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kubicek, J., Vicianova, V., Penhaker, M., Augustynek, M.: Time deformable segmentation model based on the active contour driven by Gaussian energy distribution: extraction and modeling of early articular cartilage pathological interuptions. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 297, 242–255 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kubicek, J., Valosek, J., Penhaker, M., Bryjova, I.: Extraction of chondromalacia knee cartilage using multi slice thresholding method. In: Vinh, P.C., Alagar, V. (eds.) ICCASA 2015. LNICST, vol. 165, pp. 395–403. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kubicek, J., Penhaker, M., Bryjova, I., Kodaj, M.: Articular cartilage defect detection based on image segmentation with colour mapping. In: Hwang, D., Jung, Jason J., Nguyen, N.-T. (eds.) ICCCI 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8733, pp. 214–222. Springer, Cham (2014). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, J.J., Nam, J., Jang, I.G.: Fully automated segmentation of a hip joint using the patient-specific optimal thresholding and watershed algorithm. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 154, 161–171 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pitikakis, M., et al.: Automatic measurement and visualization of focal femoral cartilage thickness in stress-based regions of interest using three-dimensional knee models. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 11(5), 721–732 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumarv, A., Jayanthy, A.K.: Classification of MRI images in 2D coronal view and measurement of articular cartilage thickness for early detection of knee osteoarthritis. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information and Communication Technology, RTEICT 2016 - Proceedings, art. no. 7808167, pp. 1907–1911 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mallikarjuna Swamy, M.S., Holi, M.S.: Knee joint cartilage visualization and quantification in normal and osteoarthritis. In: International Conference on Systems in Medicine and Biology, ICSMB 2010 - Proceedings, art. no. 5735360, pp. 138–142 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fripp, J., Crozier, S., Warfield, S.K., Ourselin, S.: Automatic segmentation and quantitative analysis of the articular cartilages from magnetic resonance images of the knee. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 29(1), 55–64 (2010). art. no. 5071225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, P., He, X., Lyu, Y., Li, Y.-M., Qiu, M.-G., Liu, S.-J.: Automatic segmentation of articular cartilages using multi-feature SVM and elastic region growing. Jilin Daxue Xuebao (Gongxueban)/J. Jilin Univ. (Eng. Technol. Ed.) 46(5), 1688–1688 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gougoutas, A.J., et al.: Cartilage volume quantification via Live Wire segmentation. Acad. Radiol. 11(12), 1389–1395 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dodin, P., Pelletier, J.P., Martel-Pelletier, J., Abram, F.: Automatic human knee cartilage segmentation from 3D magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans. Bio-Med. Eng. 57(11), 2699–2711 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xia, Y., Manjon, J.V., Engstrom, C., Crozier, S., Salvado, O., Fripp, J.: Automated cartilage segmentation from 3D MR images of hip joint using an ensemble of neural networks. In: Proceedings - International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, art. no. 7950701, pp. 1070–1073 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Kubicek
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alice Krestanova
    • 1
  • Marek Penhaker
    • 1
  • Martin Augustynek
    • 1
  • Martin Cerny
    • 1
  • David Oczka
    • 1
  1. 1.FEECSVSB-Technical University of OstravaOstrava-PorubaCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations