Advertisement

A Formal Framework for the Ontology Evolution

  • Adrianna Kozierkiewicz
  • Marcin PietranikEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11431)

Abstract

Ontologies are a formal tool for expressing knowledge. They are based on providing a logic theory about some selected universe of discourse, which defines a decomposition of a topic of interest into its basic elements and formally describes certain restrictions and constraints that need to be met. In the modern days, users cannot expect that ontologies in their initial states will be resistant to changes and remain static throughout the lifespan of their particular application. In this paper we want to focus on expressing alterations, that can be applied to ontologies in time, due to changing business requirements, emerging new knowledge or modification of the scope that an ontology needs to cover.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research project was supported by grant No. 2017/26/D/ST6/00251 from the National Science Centre, Poland.

References

  1. 1.
    Allocca, C., d’Aquin, M., Motta, E.: Detecting different versions of ontologies in large ontology repositories. In: Proceedings of IWOD 2009, Washington, D.C., USA (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chan, M., Lehmann, J., Bundy, A.: GALILEO: a system for automating ontology evolution. In: ARCOE-11, p. 46 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Leenheer, P., Mens, T.: Ontology evolution. In: Hepp, M., De Leenheer, P., De Moor, A., Sure, Y. (eds.) Ontology Management. Computing for Human Experience, vol. 7, pp. 131–176. Springer, Boston (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-69900-4_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flouris, G., Manakanats, D., Kondylaiks, H., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G.: Ontology change: classification and survey. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 23, 117–152 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hartung, M., Terwilliger, J., Rahm, E.: Recent advances in schema and ontology evolution. In: Bellahsene, Z., Bonifati, A., Rahm, E. (eds.) Schema Matching and Mapping. DCSA, vol. 21, pp. 149–190. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16518-4_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heflin, J., Pan, Z.: A model theoretic semantics for ontology versioning. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 62–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Javed, M., Abgaz, Y.M., Pahl, C.: A pattern-based framework of change operators for ontology evolution. In: Meersman, R., Herrero, P., Dillon, T. (eds.) OTM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5872, pp. 544–553. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05290-3_68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khattak, A.M., Latif, K., Lee, S.: Change management in evolving web ontologies. Knowl.-Based Syst. 37, 1–18 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klein, M., Fensel, D., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanov, D.: Ontology versioning and change detection on the web. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 197–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45810-7_20CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kondylakis, H., Plexousakis, D.: Ontology evolution without tears. Web Semant.: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 19, 42–58 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2013.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lehmann, J., Chan, M., Bundy, A.: A higher order approach to ontology evolution in physics. J. Data Semant. 2(4), 163–187 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Noy, N.F., Kunnatur, S., Klein, M., Musen, M.A.: Tracking changes during ontology evolution. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 259–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pahl, C., Javed, M., Abgaz, Y.M.: Ontology evolution for learning content management systems. In: EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, pp. 1431–1436. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pietranik, M., Nguyen, N.T.: A multi-atrribute based framework for ontology aligning. Neurocomputing 146, 276–290 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.03.067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pietranik, M., Nguyen, N.T.: Framework for ontology evolution based on a multi-attribute alignment method. In: 2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCONF), pp. 108–112. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Plessers, P., De Troyer, O., Casteleyn, S.: Understanding ontology evolution: a change detection approach. Web Semant.: Sci. Serv. Agents World Wide Web 5, 39–49 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    dos Reis, J.C., et al.: Understanding semantic mapping evolution by observing changes in biomedical ontologies. J. Biomed. Inform. 47, 71–82 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Science and ManagementWroclaw University of Science and TechnologyWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations