Advertisement

Determinants of the Attractiveness of a Public-Private Partnership in a Heterodox Perspective

  • Hanna KociemskaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in African Economic, Social and Political Development book series (AAESPD)

Abstract

The attractiveness of the subject of the transaction often justifies making an investment decision. When proposing a new heterodox approach to PPPs, it is important to present the role that investors can play and to define new objectives that they can achieve in the implementation of PPP investments based on heterodox approach to PPP. The chapter presents the determinants of the attractiveness of the proposed PPP formula for both the public investor as well as conventional and Islamic investors. It is pointed out the condition under which is the attractive that it is formula for societies that could use public services in such a new way that nobody is excluded.

References

  1. 1.
    Buchanan JM (1968) The collected works of J.M. Buchanan, vol 5. The Demand and Supply of Public Goods. Liberty Fund Inc. http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/buchanan-the-collected-works-of-james-m-buchanan-vol-5-the-demand-and-supply-of-public-goods
  2. 2.
    Fijor JM (2011) Czy dobra publiczne są naprawdę publiczne. Stud Ekon 1:88 (Fijorr Publishing)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buchanan JM (1997) Finanse publiczne w warunkach demokracji. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw, p 29Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kleer J (2006) Sektor publiczny w Polsce i na świecie. Wydawnictwo CeDeWu, pp 274–275Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Owsiak S (2005) Finanse publiczne. Teoria i praktyka. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warsaw, pp 25–26Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kwiatkowski S (2014) Teoria dóbr publicznych i rynkowe mechanizmy ich produkcji. In: Pod prąd głównego nurtu ekonomii. Instytut MisesaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hood Ch (1991) A public management for all seasons? Public Adm 69(Spring):3–19Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ferlie E, Ashburner L, Fitzgerald L, Pettigrew A (1996) The new public management in action. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zajączkowski K (2010) Przestrzeń i granice a regionalizm w Afryce Subsaharyjskiej: afrykańska i europejska percepcja. In: Żukowski A (ed) Przestrzeń i granice we współczesnej Afryce, vol 10. Forum Politologiczne series, Olsztyn, p 207Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mannan M (2008) Islamic capital market. In: Anwar H (ed) Islamic finance: a guide for international business and investment. GMB Publishing, London, p 106Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Akkizidis I, Khandelwal SK (2008) Financial risk management for Islamic banking and finance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 42–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brugnoni A (2008) Sharia governance at work: from asset-based to asset back Sukuk. Shirkah 7:21Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wroclaw University of EconomicsWrocławPoland

Personalised recommendations