Advertisement

Reflective Practice: Lessons Learnt by Using Board Games as a Design Tool for Location-Based Games

  • Catherine JonesEmail author
  • Konstantinos Papangelis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Location-based gaming (LBG) apps present many challenges to the design process. They have very different requirements compared to games that are aspatial in nature. They take place in the wild and this brings unique challenges to the practicalities of their design. There is a need to balance the core game play with the spatial requirements of location-aware technologies as well as considering the overall theme and objectives of the game together with the motivations and behaviours of players. We reflect upon this balancing act and explore an approach to creative paper prototyping through the medium of board games to co-design LBG requirements. We examine two case studies of location-based games with different goals. The first case study discusses the CrossCult Pilot 4 app built to trigger reflection on historical stories through thoughtful play. Whilst the second case study uses the City Conquerer app designed and played in Suzhou, China with a view to exploring notions of territoriality. The paper considers how spatial, social and interaction metaphors are used to simulate location-based games in a board game and discusses the lessons learned when transforming the paper game into a digital prototype. It forms part of a thinking by doing approach. By comparing the board games to the technical counterparts, we consider how effective are the features and activities implemented in the technology prototypes. We propose a set of 11 design constraints that developers must be mindful of when transitioning from paper to digital prototypes.

Keywords

Location-based games Design Prototypes Board games Game design Urban games Smart cities Playable cities 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The CrossCult (www.crosscult.eu) project Pilot 4 application was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no 693150.

Dr. Konstantinos Papangelis contributions have been supported through Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University’s RDF-15-02-17 programme.

References

  1. Ahlqvist O, Schlieder C (eds) (2018) Geogames and Geoplay: game-based approaches to the analysis of geo-information. In: Advances in geographic information science. Springer International PublishingGoogle Scholar
  2. Benford S, Crabtree A, Reeves S, Sheridan J, Dix A, Flintham M, Drozd A (2006) Designing for the opportunities and risks of staging digital experiences in public settings. ACM Press, p 427.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124836
  3. Chamberlain A, Bødker M, Papangelis K (2017) Mapping media and meaning: autoethnography as an approach to designing personal heritage soundscapes. Proc Audio Most 2017 Augment Particip SoundMusic Exp.  https://doi.org/10.1145/3123514.3123536
  4. Chorley MJ, Whitaker RM, Allen SM (2015) Personality and location-based social networks. Comput Hum Behav 46:45–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Souza e Silva A, Frith J (2012) Mobile interfaces in public spaces: locational privacy, control, and urban sociability. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Ehn P, Kyng M (1992) Cardboard computers: mocking-it-up or hands-on the future. In: Design at work. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., pp 169–196Google Scholar
  7. Evans L, Saker M (2017) Location-based social media: space, time and identity. Springer International PublishingGoogle Scholar
  8. Flanagan M (2013) Critical play: radical game design. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Huizinga J (1955) Homo ludens. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones CE, Liapis A, Lykourentzou I, Guido D (2017a) Board game prototyping to co-design a better location-based digital game. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 1055–1064Google Scholar
  11. Jones CE, Liapis A, Lykourentzou I, Guido D (2017b) Board game prototyping to co-design a better location-based digital game. ACM Press, pp 1055–1064.  https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053348
  12. Jones CE, Theodosis S, Lykourentzou I (2019) The enthusiast, the interested, the sceptic & the cynic: understanding user experience & perceived value in location-based cultural heritage games through qualitative and sentiment analysis. ACM J Comput Cult Herit Spec Issue Eval Digit Cult Resour 11Google Scholar
  13. Li Y, Hong JI, Landay JA (2004) Topiary: a tool for prototyping location-enhanced applications. In: Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. ACM, pp 217–226Google Scholar
  14. Licoppe C, Inada Y (2009) Mediated proximity and its dangers in a location aware community: a case of ‘stalking.’ Digit Cityscapes Merging Digit Urban Play 100–128Google Scholar
  15. Marins DR, de OD Justo M, Xexeo GB, de AM Chaves B (2011) SmartRabbit: a mobile exergame using geolocation. In: 2011 Brazilian symposium on games and digital entertainment (SBGAMES). IEEE, pp 232–240Google Scholar
  16. Mateos MJ, Muñoz-Merino PJ, Kloos CD, Hernández-Leo D, Redondo-Martínez D (2016) Design and evaluation of a computer based game for education. In: Frontiers in education conference (FIE), 2016 IEEE. IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  17. Matyas S, Matyas C, Schlieder C, Kiefer P, Mitarai H, Kamata M (2008) Designing location-based mobile games with a purpose: collecting geospatial data with CityExplorer. ACM Press, p 244.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1501750.1501806
  18. Nijholt A (ed) (2017) Playable cities: the city as a digital playground, gaming media and social effects. Springer SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  19. Papangelis K, Metzger M, Sheng Y, Liang H-N, Chamberlain A, Cao T (2017a) Conquering the city: understanding perceptions of mobility and human territoriality in location-based mobile games. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 1:1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1145/3130955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Papangelis K, Metzger M, Sheng Y, Liang H-N, Chamberlain A, Khan V-J (2017b) Get Off My Lawn!: starting to understand territoriality in location based mobile games. In: CHI EA ’17 proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, pp 1955–1961.  https://doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3053154
  21. Saker M, Evans L (2016) Everyday life and locative play: an exploration of foursquare and playful engagements with space and place. Media Cult Soc 38:1169–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schlieder C, Kiefer P, Matyas S (2006) Geogames: designing location-based games from classic board games. IEEE Intell Syst 21:40–46.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Snyder C (2003) Paper prototyping: the fast and easy way to design and refine user interfaces. The Morgan Kaufmann series in interactive technologies. Morgan Kaufmann Publisher, San DiegoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Spatial PlanningUniversity of LuxembourgLuxembourg CityLuxembourg
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Software EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool UniversitySuzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations