Advertisement

Place Questions and Human-Generated Answers: A Data Analysis Approach

  • Ehsan HamzeiEmail author
  • Haonan Li
  • Maria Vasardani
  • Timothy Baldwin
  • Stephan Winter
  • Martin Tomko
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

This paper investigates place-related questions submitted to search systems and their human-generated answers. Place-based search is motivated by the need to identify places matching some criteria, to identify them in space or relative to other places, or to characterize the qualities of such places. Human place-related questions have thus far been insufficiently studied and differ strongly from typical keyword queries. They thus challenge today’s search engines providing only rudimentary geographic information retrieval support. We undertake an analysis of the patterns in place-based questions using a large-scale dataset of questions/answers, MS MARCO V2.1. The results of this study reveal patterns that can inform the design of conversational search systems and in-situ assistance systems, such as autonomous vehicles.

Keywords

Geographic information retrieval Geographic questions Question answering systems Web search queries Query classification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The support by the Australian Research Council grant DP170100109 is acknowledged.

References

  1. Agnew JA (2011) Space and place. In: Agnew J, Livingstone DN (eds) The SAGE handbook of geographical knowledge. SAGE Publications Ltd, London, pp 316–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aloteibi S, Sanderson M (2014) Analyzing geographic query reformulation: an exploratory study. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 65(1):13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Backstrom L, Kleinberg J, Kumar R, Novak J (2008) Spatial variation in search engine queries. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’08, ACM, New York, USA, pp 357–366Google Scholar
  4. Caliński T, Harabasz J (1974) A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun Stat 3(1):1–27Google Scholar
  5. De Marneffe M-C, Dozat T, Silveira N, Haverinen K, Ginter F, Nivre J, Manning CD (2014) Universal stanford dependencies: a cross-linguistic typology. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on language resources and evaluation, vol 14, pp 4585–4592Google Scholar
  6. Edwardes AJ, Purves RS (2007) Eliciting concepts of place for text-based image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on geographical information retrieval, pp 15–18Google Scholar
  7. Graham M, De Sabbata S (2015) Mapping information wealth and poverty: the geography of gazetteers. Environ Plan A 47(6):1254–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guy I (2018) The characteristics of voice search: comparing spoken with typed-in mobile web search queries. ACM Trans Inf Syst (TOIS) 36(3):30:1–30:28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hollenstein L, Purves R (2010) Exploring place through user-generated content: using Flickr tags to describe city cores. J Spat Inf Sci 1(1):21–48Google Scholar
  10. Hollink JMV ( 2008) Effects of goal-oriented search suggestions. In: BNAIC 2008 Belgian-Dutch conference on artificial intelligence, p 177Google Scholar
  11. Jaro MA (1989) Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of Tampa, Florida. J Am Stat Assoc 84(406):414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jones R, Zhang WV, Rey B, Jhala P, Stipp E (2008) Geographic intention and modification in web search. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(3):229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee C-J, Craswell N, Murdock V (2015) Inter-category variation in location search. In: The 38th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, ACM, 2767797, pp 863–866Google Scholar
  14. Li X, Roth D (2006) Learning question classifiers: the role of semantic information. Nat Lang Eng 12(3):229–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Manning CD, Surdeanu M, Bauer J, Finkel J, Bethard SJ, McClosky D (2014) The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In: Association for computational linguistics (ACL) 2014 system demonstrations, pp 55–60Google Scholar
  16. Mourelatos AP (1978) Events, processes, and states. Linguist Philos 2(3):415–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nguyen T, Rosenberg M, Song X, Gao J, Tiwary S, Majumder R, Deng L (2016) MS MARCO: a human generated machine reading comprehension dataset. arXiv:1611.09268
  18. Peters ME, Neumann M, Iyyer M, Gardner M, Clark C, Lee K, Zettlemoyer L (2018) Deep contextualized word representations. In: Proceedings of the 2018 conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pp 2227–2237Google Scholar
  19. Radlinski F, Craswell N (2017) A theoretical framework for conversational search. In: Proceedings of the 2017 conference on conference human information interaction and retrieval, pp 117–126Google Scholar
  20. Sanderson M, Kohler J (2004) Analyzing geographic queries. In: SIGIR workshop on geographic information retrieval, vol 2, pp 8–10Google Scholar
  21. Shanon B (1983) Answers to where-questions. Discourse Process 6(4):319–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Spink A, Gunar O (2001) E-commerce web queries: excite and ask jeeves study. First Monday 6(7)Google Scholar
  23. Sui D, Goodchild M (2011) The convergence of gis and social media: challenges for giscience. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(11):1737–1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tomko M, Winter S (2009) Pragmatic construction of destination descriptions for urban environments. Spat Cogn Comput 9(1):1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang L, Chen L, Dong M, Hussain I, Pan Z, Chen G (2016) Understanding user behavior of asking location-based questions on microblogs. Int J Hum Comput Interact 32(7):544–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang L, Wang C, Xie X, Forman J, Lu Y, Ma W-Y, Li Y (2005) Detecting dominant locations from search queries. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pp 424–431Google Scholar
  27. Winter S, Freksa C (2012) Approaching the notion of place by contrast. J Spat Inf Sci 5(1):31–50Google Scholar
  28. Winter S, Hamzei E, Van De Weghe N, Ooms K (2018) A graph representation for verbal indoor route descriptions. Spatial cognition. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ehsan Hamzei
    • 1
    Email author
  • Haonan Li
    • 1
  • Maria Vasardani
    • 1
  • Timothy Baldwin
    • 1
  • Stephan Winter
    • 1
  • Martin Tomko
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations