Advertisement

Cellulose as Potential Feedstock for Cellulase Enzyme Production: Versatility and Properties of Various Cellulosic Biomass – Part II

  • Swati Madhu
  • Pramod W. Ramteke
Chapter
Part of the Fungal Biology book series (FUNGBIO)

Abstract

Cellulose is one of the most abundant natural resources on earth for production of biobased products and biofuels. It is also considered to be one of the cheapest renewable resources from which bioenergy can be retrieved for sustainable development of human being. Plant biomass comprises maximum proportion of cellulose, and so it is a potential source for the production of biofuels in an inexpensive way. Since cellulose is a polymer of glucose and also present in the form of hemicellulose and lignin which is insoluble in water, its biodegradation requires enzymatic reaction which is carried out by enzyme cellulases. There are many organisms on earth which live on lignocellulosic biomass by catabolizing the glycosidic linkages. And it is not limited up to some animal species like termites and crayfish. Assessment through the microbial taxonomy leads to the discovery of many genera in the domain of Bacteria and Eucarya. Fungus bears the cellulolytic behavior from the primitive Chytridiomycetes to the advanced Basidiomycetes. Aerobic bacteria metabolize cellulose by hydrolyzing β-(1,4)-linked glycosidic bond, whereas anaerobic bacteria cannot penetrate cellulosic biomass effectively and thus form complex cellulase system called cellulosome.

Keywords

Cellulose Industrial enzyme Cellulase enzyme Lignocellulosics biomass biofuels 

References

  1. Adav SS, Ravindran A, Sze SK (2012) Quantitative proteomic analysis of lignocellulolytic enzymes by Phanerochaete chrysosporium on different lignocellulosic biomass. J Proteome 75(5):1493–1504.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2011.11.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold FH (2001) Combinatorial and computational challenges for biocatalyst design. Nature 409(6817):253–257.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35051731CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker JO, Ehrman CI, Adney WS, Thomas SR, Himmel ME (1998) Hydrolysis of cellulose using ternary mixtures of purified celluloses. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 70–72(1):395–403.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02920154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhat MK (2000) Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv 18(5):355–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-9750(00)00041-0CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B (2009) The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res 37(Database):D233–D238.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavka A, Guo X, Tang SJ, Winestrand S, Jönsson LJ, Hong F (2013) Production of bacterial cellulose and enzyme from waste fiber sludge. Biotechnol Biofuels 6(1):1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chamchong M, Athapol N (1991) Effect of pH and enzymatic treatment on microfiltration and ultrafiltration of tangerine juice. J Food Process Eng 14(1):21–34.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.1991.tb00079.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Detns RC, Taken S, Co FS, Smith F, Co C, Titrim- F et al (2002) Pesquisa nacional de saneamento básico 2008. Bioresour Technol 66(3):506–577.  https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eijsink VGH, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Varum KM, Horn SJ (2008) Towards new enzymes for biofuels: lessons from chitinase research. Trends Biotechnol 26(5):228–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.02.004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris PV, Welner D, McFarland KC, Re E, Navarro Poulsen J-C, Brown K et al (2010) Stimulation of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis by proteins of glycoside hydrolase family 61: structure and function of a large, enigmatic family. Biochemistry 49(15):3305–3316.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bi100009pCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Karkehabadi S, Hansson H, Kim S, Piens K, Mitchinson C, Sandgren M (2008) The first structure of a glycoside hydrolase family 61 member, Cel61B from Hypocrea jecorina, at 1.6 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 383(1):144–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2008.08.016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuhad RC, Singh A (1993) Lignocellulose biotechnology: current and future prospects. Crit Rev Biotechnol 13(2):151–172.  https://doi.org/10.3109/07388559309040630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Singh A (2011) Microbial cellulases and their industrial applications. Enzyme Res 2011:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/280696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lavanya D, Kulkarni PK, Dixit M, Raavi PK, Krishna LNV (2015) Sources of cellulose and their applications: a review. Int J Drug Formul Res 2(November):19–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacDonald J, Doering M, Canam T, Gong Y, Guttman DS, Campbell MM, Master ER (2011) Transcriptomic responses of the softwood-degrading white-rot fungus Phanerochaete carnosa during growth on coniferous and deciduous wood. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(10):3211–3218.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02490-10CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, Elander R, Lee YY, Holtzapple M, Ladisch M (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96(6):673–686.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Reese ET, Siu RGH, Levinson HS (1950) The biological degradation of soluble cellulose derivatives and its relationship to the mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis. J Bacteriol 59(4):485–497. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC385789/PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Sreenath HK, Shah AB, Yang VW, Gharia MM, Jeffries TW (1996) Enzymatic polishing of jute/cotton blended fabrics. J Ferment Bioeng 81:18–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vaaje-Kolstad G, Horn SJ, van Aalten DMF, Synstad B, Eijsink VGH (2005) The non-catalytic chitin-binding protein CBP21 from Serratia marcescens is essential for chitin degradation. J Biol Chem 280(31):28,492–28,497.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M504468200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vaaje-Kolstad G, Westereng B, Horn SJ, Liu Z, Zhai H, Sørlie M, Eijsink VGH (2010) An oxidative enzyme boosting the enzymatic conversion of recalcitrant polysaccharides. Science 330(6001):219 LP–219222. Retrieved from http://science.sciencemag.org/content/330/6001/219.abstractCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilson DB (2004) Studies of Thermobifida fusca plant cell wall degrading enzymes. Chem Rec 4(2):72–82.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.20002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yadav S, Dubey SK (2018) Cellulose degradation potential of Paenibacillus lautus strain BHU3 and its whole genome sequence. Bioresource Technology 262:124–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.067CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zheng W, Chen X, Xue Y, Hu J, Gao MT, Tsang YF (2017) The influence of soluble polysaccharides derived from rice straw upon cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei. Process Biochem 61(June):130–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2017.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Swati Madhu
    • 1
  • Pramod W. Ramteke
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, IIT BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Biological Sciences, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences (SHUATS)AllahabadIndia

Personalised recommendations