Fungal Cellulases: New Avenues in Biofuel Production

  • Spriha Raven
  • Chitra Srivastava
  • Himanshi Kaushik
  • Veralu Hesuh
  • Archana Tiwari
Part of the Fungal Biology book series (FUNGBIO)


Cellulases are the enzymes decaying cellulose and related polysaccharides and are produced by organisms like fungi, bacteria, algae, and protozoans. Fungi are the pioneers behind cellulose degradation, and the fungal cellulases are simpler compared to the bacterial cellulase. Increased usage of fossil fuels causes catastrophic destruction to the environment and the health of the population worldwide, which calls for exploring new avenues of fuel generation to save the environment from CO2 emission. Biofuels from fungi are extensively explored, and among the diverse fungal biofuels, fungal cellulase-based biofuels seem to be a promising option. Besides the production of bioethanol, fungal cellulases are widely envisaged in paper and pulp industry, textile industry, food industry, brewery industry, and agriculture sector. An elaborate work on fungal cellulase is indeed needed for their rapid utilization as biofuel sources. Advancements in the fungal cellulase technology and the yield enhancements will make way for establishing the biofuel production as a sustainable solution to the prevalent energy crisis and the associated environmental pollution issues worldwide.


Cellulase Biofuels Bioethanol Energy crisis Fungal cellulase 


  1. Achinas S, Jan G, Euverink W (2016) Consolidated briefing of biochemical ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass. Electron J Biotechnol 23:44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed A, Bibi A (2018) Fungal cellulase; production and applications: minireview. Int J Health Life-Sci 4(1):19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajayi A, Peter-Albert C, Adedeji O (2015) Modification of cell wall degrading enzymes from soursop (Annona muricata) fruit deterioration for improved commercial development of clarified soursop juice (a review). Med Aromat Plants 4:2167–2412Google Scholar
  4. Arja M-O (2007) Cellulases in the textile industry. In: Industrial enzymes. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 51–63Google Scholar
  5. Azhara HMS, Abdullaa R, Jamboa SA, Marbawia H, Gansaua JA, Faika AAM Rodrigues KF (2017) Yeasts in sustainable bioethanol production: a review. Biochem Biophys Rep 10:52–61Google Scholar
  6. Binod P, Sindhu R, Singhania RR, Vikram S, Devi L (2010) Bioethanol production from rice straw: an overview. Bioresour Technol 101:4767–4774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao Y, Zhang H, Xiong P (2014) Application of cellulase-assisted method to extract flavonoids from plants. Agric Sci Technol 15:729Google Scholar
  8. Cartwright A (2007) Biofuels trade and sustainable development: an analysis of South African Bioethanol International Institute for Environment and Development, working documentGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen H, Qiu W (2010) Key technologies for bioethanol production from lignocellulose. Biotechnol Adv 28:556–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen Y, Wan J, Zhang X, Ma Y, Wang Y (2012) Effect of beating on recycled properties of unbleached eucalyptus cellulose fiber. Carbohydr Polym 87:730–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cortez JM, Ellis J, Bioshop DP (2001) Cellulase finishing of woven, cotton fabrics in jet and which machines. J Biotechnol 89:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cui L, Meddeb-Mouihi F, Laframboise F, Beauregard M (2015) Effects of commercial cellulases and refining on kraft pulp properties: correlations between treatment impacts and enzymatic activity components. Carbohydr Polym 115:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gil N, Gil C, Amaral ME, Costa AP (2009) Use of enzymes to improve the refining of a bleached Eucalyptus globules kraft pulp. Biochem Eng J 46:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IEA (2011) Technology roadmap: biofuels for transport. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, International Energy Agency, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuhad RC, Singh A, Eriksson KE (1997) Microorganisms and enzymes involved in the degradation of plant fiber cell walls. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 57:45–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Singh A (2011) Microbial cellulases and their industrial applications. Enzym Res. Scholar
  17. Li DC, Li AN, Papageorgiou AC (2011) Cellulases from thermophilic fungi: recent insights and biotechnological potential. Enzym Res. Scholar
  18. Msangi S, Sulser T, Rosegrant M, Valmonte-Santos R (2007) Global scenarios for biofuels: impacts and implications for food security and water use. In: Paper presented at the 10th annual conference on global economic analysis. Purdue University, IndianaGoogle Scholar
  19. Ragauskas AJ, Williams CK, Davison BH, Britovsek G, Cairney J, Eckert CA, Frederick WJ Jr, Hallett JP, Leak DJ, Liotta CL, Mielenz JR, Murphy R, Templer R, Tschaplinski T (2006) The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials. Science 311:484–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rai P, Majumdar G, Gupta SD, De S (2007) Effect of various pretreatment methods on permeate flux and quality during ultrafiltration of mosambi juice. J Food Eng 78:561–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosegrant MW, Msangi S, Sulser T, Valmonte-Santos R (2006) Biofuels and the global food balance. In: Bioenergy and agriculture: promises and challenges. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Russo L, Ladisch M (2008) Gaps in the research of 2nd generation transportation biofuels. Final report of task 41, project 2. IEA Bioenergy (2):1Google Scholar
  23. Sajith S, Priji P, Sreedevi S, Benjamin S (2016) An overview on fungal cellulases with an industrial perspective. J Nutr Food Sci 6(1).
  24. Sewalt VJH, Glasser WG, Beauchemin KA (1997) Lignin impact on fiber degradation. Reversal of inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis by chemical modification of lignin and by additives. J Agric Food Chem 45:1823–1828. Scholar
  25. Shen X, Xia L (2006) Lactic acid production from cellulosic material by synergetic hydrolysis and fermentation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 133:251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smitha R, Jisha V, Sajith S, Benjamin S (2013) Dual production of amulase and d-endotoxin by Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. Kurstakidurng biphasic fermentation. Microbiology 82:794–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Spindler DD, Wyman CE, Grohmann K (1991) The simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of pretreated woody crops to ethanol. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 28/29:773–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tong Z, Pullammanappallil P, Teixeira AA (2010) How ethanol is made from cellulosic biomass. Energy Bulletin, University of Florida, 1–4Google Scholar
  29. Yinbo Q, Zhu M, Liu K, Bao X, Lin J (2006) Studies on cellulosic ethanol production for sustainable supply of liquid fuel in China. Biotechnol J 1:1235–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zabed H, Faruq G, Sahu JN et al (2014) Bioethanol production from fermentable sugar juice. Sci World J 2014:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang SL, Sun Y, Cheng J (2002) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour Technol 83(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhang ZY, Jin B, Kelly JM (2007) Production of lactic acid from renewable materials by Rhizopus fungi. Biochem Eng J 35:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou J, Wang YH, Chu J, Zhuang YP, Zhang SL, Yin P (2008) Identification and purification of the main components of cellulases from a mutant strain of Trichoderma viride T 100-14. Bioresour Technol 99:6826–6833CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Spriha Raven
    • 1
  • Chitra Srivastava
    • 1
  • Himanshi Kaushik
    • 1
  • Veralu Hesuh
    • 2
  • Archana Tiwari
    • 1
  1. 1.Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity UniversityNoidaIndia
  2. 2.Amity Institute of Horticulture Studies and Research, Amity UniversityNoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations