Masculinity After the Opening of the Border

  • Stratis Andreas Efthymiou


This chapter investigates the relationship of GC hegemonic masculinity and post-conflict masculinity in relation to the opening of the border and the EU membership. I address post-conflict masculinity through two examples: the resistance to cross the borders and the continuous support for the existence of a potent army in the context of weakened militarism. Hegemonic masculinity is shifting away from the conscription service towards a GC transnational entrepreneurial male.


  1. Altman, D. (2001). Global sex. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (2006) [1983]. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (2nd ed.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Eliezer, U. (1995). A nation-in-arms: State, nation, and militarism in Israel’s first years. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 37(2), 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  6. Connell, R. W. (1990). The state, gender, and sexual politics: Theory and appraisal. Theory and Society, 19(5), 507–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Connell, R. W. (1998). Masculinities and globalization. Men and Masculinities, 1(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinity, violence and war. In M. Kimmel & M. Messner (Eds.), Men’s lives (3rd ed., pp. 125–130). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Conway, D. (2008). The masculine state in crisis: State response to war resistance in apartheid South Africa. Men and Masculinities, 10(4), 422–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demetriou, O. (2007). To cross or not to cross? Subjectivization and the absent state in Cyprus. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13(4), 987–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elias, J. (2007). Women workers and labour standards: The problem of ‘human rights’. Review of International Studies, 33(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elias, J., & Beasley, C. (2009). Hegemonic masculinity and globalization: Transnational business masculinities and beyond. Globalizations, 6(2), 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Enloe, C. (2004). The curious feminist: Searching for women in the new age of empire. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gill, L. (1997). Creating citizens, making men: The military and masculinity in Bolivia. Cultural Anthropology, 12(4), 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (H. Quintin, Trans.). New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Habermas, J. (1994). The past as future: Interview by Michel Haller. (M. Pensky, Trans.). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  19. Habermas, J. (1998). The inclusion of the other: Studies in political theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hadjipavlou, M. (2007). Multiple stories: The ‘crossings’ as part of citizens’ reconciliation efforts in Cyprus? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 20(1), 53–73.Google Scholar
  21. Janowitz, M. (1960). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jarman, N. (2003). Managing disorder: Responses to interface violence in North Belfast. In O. Hargie & D. Dickson (Eds.), Researching the troubles: Social science perspectives on the Northern Ireland conflict. Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Laclau and mouffe’s discourse theory. In Discourse analysis as theory and method. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Južnič, S. (1993). Identiteta (Identity). Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  25. Kotnik & Kopac. (2002). Professionalisation of the Slovenian armed forces. In F. A. Edmunds & T. M. Cottey (Eds.), The challenge of military reform in postcommunist Europe (pp. 149–164) [online]. Available at Accessed 8 October 2013.
  26. Kuhlman, J. (2003). Comparative studies in military and society in Europe. In F. Kernic & J. Callaghan (Eds.), Armed forces and international security: Global trends and issues (pp. 93–102). New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  28. Leonard, M. (1998). Making Europe: The search for European identity. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  29. Merav, P., & Sasson-Levy, O. (2015). Avoiding military service in a militaristic society: A chronicle of resistance to hegemonic masculinity. Peace and Change: A Journal of Peace Research, 40(4), 462–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nye, R. A. (2007). Western masculinities in war and peace. American Historical Review, 112(4), 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism, and political theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Putnam, R. D. (2002). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(10), 65–78.Google Scholar
  33. Rai, S. M. (2002). Gender and the political economy of development. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. Saigol, R. (1998). Militarization, nation and gender. In M. Zia & I. Ahmad (Eds.), Making enemies, creating conflict: Pakistan’s crises of state and society (pp. 43–57). Lahore: Masha Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stratis Andreas Efthymiou
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Applied SciencesBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations