Advertisement

Collaborative Conflict Resolution: A Case Study of Women’s Self-help Groups in North-Western Zimbabwe

  • Cresencia NyathiEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The self-help group concept began in Asian countries, particularly India and Bangladesh, and was introduced into Zimbabwe in 2013. Rural women have certainly benefitted from such groups, particularly as a result of having access to funds from which they can borrow to finance small money-making initiatives. However, the groups have also struggled as a result of internal conflicts, including the non-repayment of loans, the causes and consequences of which are not well understood. This chapter reports an action research project designed to explore these conflicts and, in a participatory fashion, to devise ways to address them. Thereafter, Zimbabweans had positive outcomes in terms of building the skills of dialogue in self-help group contexts and the repayment of outstanding loans.

Keywords

Rural women Self-help groups Zimbabwe 

References

  1. Bähre, E. 2007. Money and violence: financial self-help groups in a South African township. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  2. Bullen, D. and Sokheang, H. 2015. Identification and effectiveness of self-help groups in Cambodia (CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems Program Report, AAS-2015-11). Penang: WorldFish.Google Scholar
  3. Creighton, C., Yieke, F., Okely, J., Mareri, L. and Wafula, C. 2008. Gender inequalities in Kenya. Paper presented at the Understanding gender inequalities in Kenya. Egerton University, 5–8 April. Available: https://www.popline.org/node/183969 (Accessed 25 April 2019).
  4. Guerin, I. and Palier, J. 2007. Microfinance and the empowerment of women: will the silent revolution take place? Dialogue, 37: 27–34.Google Scholar
  5. Kalpana, K. 2008. The vulnerability of ‘self-help’: women and microfinance in South India. Institute for Developmental Studies. Working Paper 303. Available: https://www.microfinancegateway.org/sites/default/files/mfg-en-paper-the-vulnerability-of-self-help-women-and-microfinance-in-south-india-apr-2008.pdf (Accessed 19 May 2015).
  6. McTaggart, R. 1998. Is validity really an issue for participatory action research? Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 4(2): 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ramachandar, L. and Pelto, P. 2009. Self-Help Groups in Bellary: microfinance and women’s empowerment. Journal of Family Welfare, 55: 1–16.Google Scholar
  8. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. 2001. Action research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Rothwell, J. 2015. In mixed company: communicating in small groups and Teams. 9th edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Samanta, G. 2009. Microfinance and women: gender issues of poverty alleviation and empowerment. The Microfinance Review, 1(1): 100–120.Google Scholar
  11. Stringer, E. T. 2014. Action research. 4th edition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Yang, M. and Stanley, T. D. 2012. Micro-credit and income: a literature review and meta-analysis. Bulletin of Economics and Meta-analysis. Available: https://www.hendrix.edu/uploadedFiles/Departments_and_Programs/Business_and_Economics/AMAES/Micro-Credit%20Meta-Analysis12-18(2).pdf (Accessed 25 April 2019).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Durban University of TechnologyDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations