Advertisement

Water, Carbon, and Phosphorus Footprint Concerns in the Food Industry

  • Suresh D. SharmaEmail author
  • Arpan R. Bhagat
  • Salvatore Parisi
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science book series (BRIEFSMOLECULAR)

Abstract

This chapter discusses recent environmental concerns of the food consumer. The expansion of human populations worldwide and other factors have progressively caused the continuous increase of lands for agricultural purposes, with consequent deforestation in developing areas above all. At the same time, the trend of produced foods per area of agricultural land has been constantly increased with the consequent enhancement of the growth of human beings, although the amount of cultivated lands has been reduced in the last forty years. Food production (or food overproduction) is often correlated with environmental concerns because of the main role of three resources and their increasing consumption by food industries: water, energy, and anti-pest agents. More than a single food or food category may be interested in this way. For these reasons, three peculiar indicators—water footprint, carbon footprint (concerning the energetic consumption), and phosphorus footprint (with reference to pesticides and other similar chemical compounds)—are popular at present. However, are these footprints good indicators? This chapter discusses advantages and risks associated with these variables by a broader perspective.

Keywords

Carbon footprint Global warming Greenhouse gas emission Pesticide Phosphorus footprint Pollution Water footprint 

Abbreviations

CO2e

Carbon dioxide equivalent

CF

Carbon footprint

FAO

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

GC

Gas chromatography

GHG

Greenhouse gas

CH4

Methane

N2O

Nitrous oxide

NGO

Non-governmental organisation

P

Phosphorus

PF

Phosphorus footprint

RSPO

Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil

UK

United Kingdom

WF

Water footprint

References

  1. Amthor JS (1998) Perspective on the relative insignificance of increasing atmospheric CO2 concentration to crop yield. Field Crops Res 58(2):109–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4290(98)00089-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anonymous (2006a) UK schools carbon footprint scoping study for Sustainable Development Commission. Global Action Plan, Stockholm Environment Institute, and Eco-Logica Ltd. for the Sustainable Development Commission, London, Mar 2006. Available http://www.se-ed.co.uk/sites/default/files/resources/GAP-Final-Report.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  3. Anonymous (2006b) Counting consumption—CO2 emissions, material flows and ecological footprint of the UK by region and devolved country. World Wildlife Fund (WWF)-UK, Godalming, 84 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Austin RB (1999) Yield of wheat in the United Kingdom: recent advances and prospects. Crop Sci 39(6):1604–1610.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961604xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbier EB (2004) Explaining agricultural land expansion and deforestation in developing countries. Am J Agric Econ 86(5):1347–1353.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00688.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg W, Brunsch R, Hellebrand HJ, Kern J (2006) Methodology for measuring gaseous emissions from agricultural buildings, manure, and soil surfaces. In: Proceedings of the workshop on agricultural air quality: state of the science, Bolger Conference Center, Potomac, U.S.A., vol 58, pp 233–241, 5–8 June 2006Google Scholar
  7. Boardman B (2008) Carbon labelling: too complex or will it transform our buying? Signif 5(4):168–171.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2008.00322.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boote KJ, Pickering NB, Allen LH Jr (1997) Plant modeling: advances and gaps in our capability to predict future crop growth and yield in response to global climate change. In: Allen LH Jr, Kirkham MB, Olszyk DM, Whitman CE (eds) Advances in carbon dioxide effects research. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 179–228Google Scholar
  9. BSI (2008) PAS2050: 2008, specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institution (BSI), LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Capper JL (2011) Replacing rose-tinted spectacles with a high-powered microscope: the historical versus modern carbon footprint of animal agriculture. Anim Front 1(1):26–32.  https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2011-0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Capper JL, Cady RA, Bauman DE (2009) The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. J Anim Sci 87(6):2160–2167.  https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-1781CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY, Savenije HHG, Gautam R (2006) The water footprint of cotton consumption: an assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecol Econ 60(1):186–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Core Writing Team, Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Geneva, 104 pp. Available https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_full_report.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  14. Daniel TC, Sharpley AN, Lemunyon JL (1998) Agricultural phosphorus and eutrophication: a symposium overview. J Environ Qual 27:251–257.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700020002xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Oliveira ME, Vaughan BE, Rykiel EJ Jr (2005) Ethanol as fuel: energy, carbon dioxide balances, and ecological footprint. BioSci 55(7):593–602.  https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005) 055[0593:EAFECD]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DEFRA (2006) The environment in your pocket. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Downing TE, Harrison PA, Butterfield RE, Lonsdale KG (1999) Climate change, climatic variability and agriculture in Europe: an integrated assessment. Research Report No. 21. Environmental Change Unit, University of Oxford, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Easterling WE, Mearns LO, Hays CJ, Marx D (2001) Comparison of agricultural impacts of climate change calculated from high and low resolution climate change scenarios. Part II. Accounting for adaptation and CO2 direct effects. Clim Change 51, 2:173–197.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012267900745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edwards-Jones G, Milà i Canals L, Hounsome N, Truninger M, Koerber G, Hounsome B, Cross P, York EH, Hospido A, Plassmann K, Harris IM, Edwards RT, Day GAS, Tomos AD, Cowell SJ, Jones DL (2008) Testing the assertion that ‘local food is best’: the challenges of an evidence-based approach. Trends Food Sci Technol 19:5:265–274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans LT, Fischer RA (1999) Yield potential: its definition, measurement, and significance. Crop Sci 39(6):1544–1551.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961544xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ewert F, Rounsevell MDA, Reginster I, Metzger MJ, Leemans R (2005) Future scenarios of European agricultural land use: I. Estimating changes in crop productivity. Agric Ecosystems Environ 107:2–3:101–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/jagee.2004.12.003
  22. FAOSTAT (2018) The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Available http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed 10 Sept 2008
  23. Galli A, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, Knoblauch D, Ewing B, Giljum S (2012) Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “footprint family” of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol Indic 16:100–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grigg OB (1993) The world food problem. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Grubb and Ellis (2007) Meeting the carbon challenge: the role of commercial real estate owners, users & managers. Grubb & Ellis Company, Chicago, Apr 2007Google Scholar
  26. Günther J, Thevs N, Gusovius HJ, Sigmund I, Brückner T, Beckmann V, Abdusalik N (2017) Carbon and phosphorus footprint of the cotton production in Xinjiang, China, in comparison to an alternative fibre (Apocynum) from Central Asia. J Clean Prod 148(1):490–497.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hammerschlag R, Barbour W (2003) Life-cycle assessment and indirect emission reductions: issues associated with ownership and trading. Institute for Lifecycle Environmental Assessment (ILEA), Seattle, May 2003. Available http://www.ilea.org/downloads/LCAEmissReductions.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  28. Harrison PA, Butterfield RE (1996) Effects of climate change on Europe-wide winter wheat and sunflower productivity. Clim Res 7:225–241.  https://doi.org/10.3354/cr007225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hertwich EG, Peters GP (2009) Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. Environ Sci Technol 43(16):6414–6420.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es803496aCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoekstra A (2013) The water footprint of animal products: the meat crisis: developing more sustainable and ethical production and consumption. In: D’Silva J, Webster J (eds) The meat crisis. Routledge, London, pp 41–52Google Scholar
  31. Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM (2012) The water footprint of humanity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(9):3232–3237.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109936109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2011) The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. Earthscan, London and Washington, DC. Available http://waterfootprint.org/media/downloads/TheWaterFootprintAssessmentManual_2.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  33. Hooda PS, Edwards AC, Anderson HA, Miller A (2000) A review of water quality concerns in livestock farming areas. Sci Total Environ 250(1–3):143–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00373-9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Isermann K (1990) Share of agriculture in nitrogen and phosphorus emissions into the surface waters of Western Europe against the background of their eutrophication. Fert Res 26(1–3):253–269.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ISO (2006) ISO 14040:2006—environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  36. Jamieson P, Porter J, Semenov M, Brooks R, Ewert F, Ritchie J (1999) Comments on “Testing winter wheat simulation models predictions against observed UK grain yields” by Landau et al. (1998). Agric Forest Meteorol 96, 1–3:157–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1923(99)00060-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson DG (1999) The growth of demand will limit output growth for food over the next quarter century. Proc Natl Acad of Sci 96(11):5915–5920.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.11.5915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kenny T, Gray NF (2008) Comparative performance of six carbon footprint models for use in Ireland. Environ Impact Assess Rev 29(1):1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2008.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kimball BA, Kobayashi K, Bindi M (2002) Responses of agricultural crops to free-air CO2 enrichment. Adv Agron 77:293–368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2113(02)77017-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Landau S, Mitchell RAC, Barnett V, Colls JJ, Craigon J, Moore KL, Payne RW (1998) Testing winter wheat simulation models’ predictions against observed UK grain yields. Agric For Meteorol 89:85–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1923(97)00069-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Laurent A, Olsen SI, Hauschild MZ (2010) Carbon footprint as environmental performance indicator for the manufacturing industry. CIRP Ann 59(1):37–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Laurent A, Olsen SI, Hauschild MZ (2012) Limitations of carbon footprint as indicator of environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 46(7):4100–4108.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es204163fCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Leach AM, Emery KA, Gephart J, Davis KF, Erisman JW, Leip A, Pace ML, D’Odorico P, Carr J, Cattell Noll L, Castner E, Galloway JN (2016) Environmental impact food labels combining carbon, nitrogen, and water footprints. Food Policy 61:213–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.03.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lenzen M (2008) Double-counting in life cycle calculations. J Ind Ecol 12(4):583–599.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00067.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lenzen M, Murray J, Sack F, Wiedmann T (2007) Shared producer and consumer responsibility—theory and practice. Ecol Econ 61(1):27–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Levine SL, Schindler DW (1989) Phosphorus, nitrogen and carbon dynamics of experimental lake 303 during recovery from eutrophication. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46(1):2–10.  https://doi.org/10.1139/f89-001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Long SP (1991) Modification of the response of photosynthesis productivity to rising temperature by atmospheric CO2 concentration: has its importance been underestimated? Plant Cell Environ 14(8):729–739.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01439.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 25:277(5325):504–509.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2011) A global assessment of the green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and crop products. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:1577–1600.  https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Metson GS, Cordell D, Ridoutt B (2016) Potential impact of dietary choices on phosphorus recycling and global phosphorus footprints: the case of the average Australian city. Front Nutr 3:35.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2016.00035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Meyer WB, Turner BL (1992) Human population growth and global land-use/cover change. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 23(1):39–61.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Morison JIL, Lawlor DW (1999) Interactions between increasing CO2 concentration and temperature on plant growth. Plant Cell Environ 22(6):659–682.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00443.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Naylor RL (1996) Energy and resource constraints on intensive agricultural production. Ann Rev Energy Environ 21(1):99–123.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.21.1.99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Oerke EC, Dehne HW (1997) Global crop production and the efficacy of crop protection-current situation and future trends. Eur J Plant Pathol 103(3):203–215.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008602111248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Padgett JP, Steinemann AC, Clarke JH, Vandenbergh MP (2008) A comparison of carbon calculators. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28:106–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pandey D, Agrawal M, Pandey JS (2011) Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation. Environ Environ Monit Assess 178(1–4):135–160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-yCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Parry M, Rosenzweig C, Iglesias A, Livermore M, Fischer G (2004) Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Change 14(1):53–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Peters GP (2010) Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2(4):245–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.05.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43(11):4098–4104.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es802423eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. POST (2006) Carbon footprint of electricity generation. POST number 268, Oct 2006, pp 1–4. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST), London. Available https://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/postpn268.pdf. Accessed 10 Sep 2018
  61. Rees WE (1996) Revisiting carrying capacity: area-based indicators of sustainability. Popul Environ 17(3):195–215.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02208489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reynolds MP, Rajaram S, Sayre KD (1999) Physiological and genetic changes of irrigated wheat in the post-green revolution period and approaches for meeting projected global demand. Crop Sci 39(6):1611–1621.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961611xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ridoutt BR, Sanguansri P, Harper GS (2011) Comparing carbon and water footprints for beef cattle production in Southern Australia. Sustain 3:2443–2455.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su3122443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rosegrant MW, Paisner MS, Meijer S, Witcover J (2001) Global food projections to 2020. Emerging trends and alternative futures. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  65. Rosenzweig C, Parry ML (1994) Potential impact of climate change on world food supply. Nature 367(6459):133–138.  https://doi.org/10.1038/367133a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rounsevell MDA, Annetts JE, Audsley E, Mayr T, Reginster I (2003) Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural land use at the regional scale. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95(2–3):465–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8809(02)00217-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ryding SO, Enell M, Wennberg L (1990) Swedish agricultural nonpoint source pollution: a summary of research and findings. Lake Reserv Manag 6(2):207–217.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07438149009354711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schiermeier Q (2006) Climate credits. Nature 444(7122):976–977.  https://doi.org/10.1038/444976aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Segal R, MacMillan T (2009) Water labels on food. Issues and recommendations. Food Ethics Council, Brighton. Available https://www.foodethicscouncil.org/uploads/publications/waterlabels_0.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  70. Sharpley AN, Menzel RG (1987) The impact of soil fertiliser phosphorus on the environment. Adv Agron 41:297–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60807-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sharpley A, Foy B, Withers P (2000) Practical and innovative measures for the control of agricultural phosphorus losses to water: an overview. J Environ Qual 29(1):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900010001xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shaviv A, Mikkelsen RL (1993) Controlled-release fertilizers to increase efficiency of nutrient use and minimize environmental degradation—a review. Fert Res 35(1–2):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stamm CH, Flühler H, Gächter R, Leuenberger J, Wunderli H (1998) Preferential transport of phosphorus in drained grassland soils. J Environ Qual 27(3):515–522.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1998.00472425002700030006xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Steen-Olsen K, Weinzettel J, Cranston G, Ercin AE, Hertwich EG (2012) Carbon, land, and water footprint accounts for the European Union: consumption, production, and displacements through international trade. Environ Sci Technol 46(20):10883–10891.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es301949tCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Thiex N (2016) Determination of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium release rates of slow-and controlled-release fertilizers: single-laboratory validation, first action 2015.15. J AOAC Int 99, 2:353–359.  https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.15-0294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Trucost (2006) Carbon counts: the Trucost carbon footprint ranking of UK Investment Funds. Trucost Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. Tubiello FN, Ewert F (2002) Simulating the effects of elevated CO2 on crops: approaches and applications for climate change. Eur J Agron 18(1–2):57–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00097-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. UN (1998) Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC). United Nations (UN), New York, 21 pp. Available https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/kpeng.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2018
  79. UN News (2007) Climate change ‘defining issue of our era’ says Ban Kimoon, hailing G8 action. 2007. United Nations (UN), New York. https://news.un.org/en/story/2007/06/221622-climate-change-defining-issue-our-era-says-ban-ki-moon-hailing-g8-action. Accessed 07 Sept 2018
  80. USCCTP (2005) Technology options for near and long term future. United States Climate Change Technology Program (USCCTP), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  81. USEPA (1990) National water quality inventory 1988. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Report to Congress. Office of Water, US Govt. Print Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  82. Velasco E, Pressley S, Allwine E, Westberg H, Lamb B (2005) Measurements of CO2 fluxes from the Mexico City urban landscape. Atmos Environ 39(38):7433–7446.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.08.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Virtue WA, Clayton JW (1997) Sheep dip chemicals and water pollution. Sci Total Environ 194–195:207–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(96)05365-XCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Wang F, Sims JT, Ma L, Ma W, Dou Z, Zhang F (2011) The phosphorus footprint of China’s food chain: implications for food security, natural resource management, and environmental quality. J Environ Qual 40(4):1081–1089.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2010.0444CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Weber CL, Matthews HS (2008) Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 42(10):3508–3513.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es702969fCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Wiedmann T, Minx J (2008) A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. In: Pertsova CC (ed) Ecological economics research trends (Chap. 1), Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, pp 1–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suresh D. Sharma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Arpan R. Bhagat
    • 2
  • Salvatore Parisi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park, State CollegeUSA
  2. 2.Saputo Dairy Foods USA, LLCDallasUSA
  3. 3.Al-Balqa Applied UniversityAl-SaltJordan

Personalised recommendations