Advertisement

Acknowledging Diversity in Responses to Fires

  • Gail Steptoe-WarrenEmail author
  • Thomas Rhys Evans
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents the current understanding of how the general public respond to fires, discussed from the viewpoint of both the Fire Service and academia. The consequences of public responses to fire and to the Fire Service are discussed, with respect to risk, response times (and their subsequent consequences), Fire Service targets and resourcing, and communities. The current study adopts an interview methodology to explore the experiences of previous victims of fire. Following a brief introduction of the participants (anonymized), results of interviews are presented, with regards to how the individuals are alerted, respond to and feel towards fire outbreaks, and the subsequent impact upon the trust of the Fire Service. The organizational consequences of the diversity in responses are discussed with reference to the potential for altering expected response times. The wider conclusions for risk and diversity in responses to emergency events for the blue-light services are noted, before considering the potential lessons to be learnt.

References

  1. Ahrens, M. (2008). Home smoke alarms: The data as context for decision. Fire Technology, 44(4), 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arch, B. N., & Thurston, M. N. (2012). An assessment of the impact of home safety assessments on fires and fire-related injuries: A case study of Cheshire Fire and Rescue Service. Journal of Public Health, 35(2), 200–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, M., Bruck, D., & Jago, A. (2007). Mean annual probability of having a residential fire experience throughout a lifetime: development and application of a methodology. In Seventh Asia-Oceania Symposium on Fire Service and Technology, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.Google Scholar
  5. Brennan, G., & Bruck, P. (2001). Recognition of fire cues during sleep. In J. Shields (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Human Behaviour in Fire, London, Interscience Communications (pp. 241–252).Google Scholar
  6. Brennan, P., & Thomas, I. (2001). Victims of fire? Predicting outcomes in residential fires. In Human Behaviour in Fire: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium, Boston. London: Interscience Communications.Google Scholar
  7. Bruck, D., & Ball, M. (2005). Sleep and fire: Who is at risk and can the risk be reduced? Fire safety science. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium (pp. 37–51).Google Scholar
  8. Daly, J., Willis, K., Small, R., Green, J., Welch, N., Kealt, M., & Hughes, E. A. (2007). Hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, 43–49.Google Scholar
  9. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2013). Fire statistics: Great Britain April 2013 to March 2014 [online]. Accessed June 23, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fire-statistics.
  10. Department for Communities and Local Government. (2015). Financial sustainability of fire and rescue services. HC 491 SESSION 2015-16 23 NOVEMBER 2015.Google Scholar
  11. DiGuiseppi, C., Roberts, I., Wade, A., Sculpher, M., Edwards, P., Godward, C., et al. (2002). Incidence of fires and related injuries after giving out free smoke alarms: Cluster randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 325, 995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fahy, R. F., & Proulx, G. (2009). Panic and human behavior in fire [online]. Accessed September 18, 2018, from http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/irc.
  13. Fire Brigade Union. (2018). Lives at risk as fire service resources “stretched to breaking point” [online]. Accessed June 16, 2018, from https://www.fbu.org.uk/news/2018/06/01/lives-risk-fire-service-resources-stretched-breaking-point.
  14. Fire Industry Association. (2014). ‘Fire kills’ campaign ‘key to driving fire deaths and injuries to record low’ [online]. Accessed June 23, 2018, from https://www.fia.uk.com/news/fire-kills-campaign-key-to-driving-fire-deaths-and-injuries-to-record-low.html.
  15. Fire Safety Engineering Group. (2018). LIFEBID (Lessons in Fire Evacuation Behaviour in Dwellings) [online]. Accessed June 16, 2018, from https://fseg.gre.ac.uk/fire/lifebid.html.
  16. Fire Service. (2018). Fire safety in the home [online]. Accessed June 23, 2018, from https://www.fireservice.co.uk/safety/.
  17. Futurelab. (2018). [online]. Accessed September 18, 2018, from https://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/FUTL60/FUTL60.pdf.
  18. Goldenson, R. M. (Ed.). (1984). Longman dictionary of psychology and psychiatry. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. HM Government. (2017). Fire safety in the home [online]. Accessed June 17, 2018, from https://firesafety.campaign.gov.uk/.
  20. Home Office. (2013). Fire incidents response times [online]. Accessed June 23, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/fire-incidents-response-times.
  21. Home Office. (2014). Fire incidents response times 2013–2014 [online]. Accessed June 23, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/fire-incidents-response-times-england-2013-to-2014.
  22. Home Office. (2016). Fire prevention and rescue [online]. Accessed September 18, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/fire-prevention-and-rescue.
  23. Home Office. (2018a, May 10). Fire and rescue incident statistics: England, year ending December 2017. Statistical Bulletin [accessed online]. Accessed June 16, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/fire-and-rescue-incident-statistics-england-year-ending-december-2017.
  24. Home Office. (2018b). Response times to fires attended by fire and rescue services: England, April 2016 to March 2017 [online]. Accessed June 16, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/response-times-to-fires-attended-by-fire-and-rescue-services-england-april-2016-to-march-2017.
  25. Kowalski-Trakofler, K. M., Vaught, C., & Scharf, T. (2003). Judgment and decision making under stress: An overview for emergency managers. International Journal of Emergency Management, 1(3), 278–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lovreglio, R., Fonzone, A., Dell’Olio, L., Borri, D., & Ibeas, A. (2014). The role of herding behaviour in exit choice during evacuation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 160, 390–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lovreglio, R., Ronchi, E., & dell’Ohio, L. (2016). A study of herding behaviour in exit choice during emergencies based on random utility theory. Safety Science, 82, 421–431.Google Scholar
  28. Lovreglio, R., Ronchi, E., & Nilsson, D. (2016). An Evacuation decision model based on perceived risk, social influence and behavioural uncertainty. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 66, 226–242.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, I. (2005). Human behavior contributing to unintentional residential fire deaths 1997–2003 (New Zealand Fire Service Commission Research Report Number 47).Google Scholar
  30. Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. (2015). Fire statistics monitor: April 2014 to March 2015: Statistics on fires, casualties, false alarms and non-fire incidents attended by fire and rescue services in England [online]. Accessed June 23, 2018, from, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/fire-statistics-monitor-april-2014-to-march-2015.
  31. Nielsen, K., & Abildgaard, J. (2013). Organizational interventions: A research-based framework for the evaluation of both process and effects. Work and Stress, 27(3), 278–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nillsen, D., & Johansson, A. (2009). Social influenced during the initial phase of a fire evacuation—Analysis of evacuation experiments in a cinema theatre. Fire Safety Journal, 44, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pauls, J. (1999). A personal perspective on research consulting and codes/standards development in fire-related human behaviour 1969–1999 with an emphasis on space and time factors. Fire and Materials, 23, 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Proulx, G. (2003). Playing with fire: Understanding behaviour in burning buildings. National Research Council Canada, NRCC-46619 [online]. Accessed August 20, 2018, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=DDDB087F86941338A3D40D42BCDA4AE3?doi=10.1.1.10.2387%26rep=rep1%26type=pdf.
  35. Proulx, G., & Fahy, R. (1997). The time delay to start evacuation: Review of five case studies. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Fire Safety Science (pp. 783–794).Google Scholar
  36. Purser, D. A., & Bensilum, M. (2001). Qualification of behavior for engineering design standards and escape time calculations. Safety Science, 38, 157–182.Google Scholar
  37. Rice, P. L., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. South Melbourne (Australia): Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Richards, L., & Morse, J. M. (2007). Users guide for qualitative methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Rohde, D., Corcoran, J., Sydes, M., & Higginson, A. (2016). The association between smoke alarm presence and injury and death rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fire Safety Journal, 81, 58–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ronchi, E. (2012). Evacuation modelling in road tunnel fires [online]. Accessed June 23, 2018, from portal.research.lu.se/portal/files/5519346/4001478.pdf.
  41. Santos, G., & Aguirre, B. E. (2004). A critical review of emergency evacuation simulation models [online]. Accessed June 23, 2018, from http://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/299.
  42. SFPE. (2003). Engineering guide: Human behaviour in fire. Bethesda, MD: Society of Fire Protection Engineers.Google Scholar
  43. Sime, J. D. (1990). The concept of ‘panic’. In D. Canter (Ed.), Fires and human behaviour (2nd ed., p. 76). London: David Fulton Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Thompson, O. F., Galea, E. R., & Hulse, L. M. (2018). A review of the literature on human behaviour in dwelling fires. Safety Science, 109, 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xiong, L., Bruck, D., & Ball, M. (2016). Preventing accidental residential fires: The role of human involvement in non-injury house fires. Fire and Materials, 41(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Psychological, Social and Behavioural SciencesCoventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations