Advertisement

The Impact and Future of Occupational Psychology in the Fire Service: A Discussion

  • Thomas Rhys EvansEmail author
  • Gail Steptoe-Warren
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter brings together the contributions of the current body of work in emotion, risk and decision-making. Lessons gleaned about the design and implementation of Occupational Psychology-based projects in the context of the Fire Service are also reflected upon. The future of the Fire Service, and the study of Psychology as a whole, is discussed to determine the future value and priorities for Occupational Psychology in this context. In particular, how Open Science principles can improve practices and lead to more convincing conclusions, and how the Occupational Psychology community can positively influence various organisational, team, individual and community needs within the Fire Service. The chapter is concluded with a call to arms for more robust practices to support the Fire Service.

References

  1. Funder, D. C., Levine, J. M., Mackie, D. M., Morf, C. C., Sansone, C., Vazire, S., & West, S. G. (2014). Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: Recommendations for research and educational practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015). The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLoS Biology, 13(3), e1002106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Houtkoop, B. L., Chambers, C., Macleod, M., Bishop, D. V., Nichols, T. E., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2018). Data sharing in psychology: A survey on barriers and preconditions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McCabe, C. J., Kim, D. S., & King, K. M. (2018). Improving present practices in the visual display of interactions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., … Chartier, C. R. (2018). The psychological science accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515.Google Scholar
  7. Motyl, M., Demos, A. P., Carsel, T. S., Hanson, B. E., Melton, Z. J., Mueller, A. B., … & Yantis, C. (2017). The state of social and personality science: Rotten to the core, not so bad, getting better, or getting worse? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(1), 34–58.Google Scholar
  8. Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., … & Contestabile, M. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425.Google Scholar
  9. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716.Google Scholar
  10. Simons, D. J. (2018). Introducing advances in methods and practices in psychological science. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Soderberg, C. K. (2018). Using OSF to share data: A step-by-step guide. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 115–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., Platow, M. J., Fransen, K., Yang, J., … & Boen, F. (2014). Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 1001–1024.Google Scholar
  13. Washburn, A. N., Hanson, B. E., Motyl, M., Skitka, L. J., Yantis, C., Wong, K. M., … & Carsel, T. S. (2018). Why do some psychology researchers resist adopting proposed reforms to research practices? A description of researchers’ rationales. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 166–173.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Psychological, Social and Behavioural SciencesCoventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations