How Pioneering Managers Strive to Integrate Social Risk Management in Government Debt Collection

  • Paola De BernardiEmail author
  • Francesca Ricciardi
  • Canio Forliano
  • E. Sorano


This study explores risk management issues in local government-owned enterprises in accordance with the third wave of governance, organization and management logics of Public Administration: the Public Value (PV) approach. However, the coexistence between the emerging PV approach and the more traditional and consolidated ones is often difficult, also because of the resistance of shareholders who may not consider the management of system-level risks as a priority mission for their company. For this reason, we have analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of the Traditional Approach and the New Public Management approach in the public sector management.


Social risk Anti-corruption risk Transparency Public Value approach Local government-owned enterprise 


  1. Abdullah, S. F., Yusof, M. M., & Jambari, D. I. (2016). Risk management model for information systems planning in public sector. Jurnal Pengurusan, 48. Retrieved from
  2. Abernethy, M. A., & Chua, W. F. (1996). A field study of control system “redesign”: The impact of institutional processes on strategic choice. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(2), 569–606.Google Scholar
  3. Ackermann, C., & Marx, B. (2016). Internal audit risk management in metropolitan municipalities. Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions, 6(3), 45–51.
  4. Ameyaw, E. E., & Chan, A. P. (2015). Risk ranking and analysis in PPP water supply infrastructure projects. Facilities, 33(7–8), 428–453. Scholar
  5. Ammons, D. N., & Canada, B. B. (2000). Tracking performance in local government risk management—A catalog of performance measures. Public Entity Risk Institute. Fairfax: Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Andersson, T., & Liff, R. (2012). Does patient-centred care mean risk aversion and risk ignoring? Unintended consequences of NPM reforms. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 25(4), 260–271. Scholar
  7. Asenova, D., Bailey, S. J., & McCann, C. (2013). Managing the social risks of public spending cuts in Scotland. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Retrieved from
  8. Asenova, D., Bailey, S. J., & McCann, C. (2015). Public sector risk managers and spending cuts: Mitigating risks. Journal of Risk Research, 18(5), 552–565. Scholar
  9. Attig, N., Cleary, S., El Ghoul, S., & Guedhami, O. (2013). Institutional investment horizons and the cost of equity capital. Financial Management, 42(2), 441–477. Scholar
  10. Bannerman, P. L. (2008). Risk and risk management in software projects: A reassessment. Journal of Systems and Software, 81(12), 2118–2133. Scholar
  11. Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2010). Individual and corporate social responsibility. Economica, 77(305), 1–19. Scholar
  12. Boehm, B. (1991). Software risk management: Principles and practices. IEEE Software, 8, 32–41. Scholar
  13. Bosco, B. (2016). Old and new factors affecting corruption in Europe: Evidence from panel data. Economic Analysis and Policy, 51, 66–85. Scholar
  14. Boubaker, S., Lakhal, F., & Nekhili, M. (2011). The determinants of web-based corporate reporting in France. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(2), 126–155. Scholar
  15. Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1996). A theory of privatisation. The Economic Journal, 106(435), 309–319. Scholar
  16. Bruton, G. D., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Stan, C., & Xu, K. (2015). State-owned enterprises around the WORLD as hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 92–114. Scholar
  17. Bryman, B., & Bell, E. (2011). Business research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74, 445–456. Scholar
  19. Bui, H. T., Baruch, Y., Chau, V. S., & He, H. W. (2016). Team learning: The missing construct from a cross-cultural examination of higher education. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(1), 29–51.Google Scholar
  20. Collier, P. M., & Woods, M. (2011). A comparison of the local authority adoption of risk management in England and Australia. Australian Accounting Review, 21(2), 111–123.Google Scholar
  21. Cooper, T. (2012). Exploring strategic risk in communities: Evidence from a Canadian province. Journal of Enterprising Communities, 6(4), 350–368. Scholar
  22. Córdoba-Pachón, J. R., Garde-Sánchez, R., & Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P. (2014). A systemic view of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Knowledge and Process Management, 21(3), 206–219. Scholar
  23. Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2003). The new public service: Serving, not steering (3rd ed.). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  24. Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service revisited. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664–672.Google Scholar
  25. der Wal, Z., Nabatchi, T., & de Graaf, G. (2015). From galaxies to universe: A cross-disciplinary review and analysis of public values publications from 1969 to 2012. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(1), 13–28. Scholar
  26. de Souza Briggs, X. (2008). Democracy as problem solving. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. de Zwaan, L., Stewart, J., & Subramaniam, N. (2011). Internal audit involvement in enterprise risk management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(7), 586–604. Scholar
  28. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. Scholar
  29. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  30. Esmark, A. (2017). Maybe it is time to rediscover technocracy? An old framework for a new analysis of administrative reforms in the governance era. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), 501–516.
  31. European Commission. (2014). Report from the commission to the council and the European Parliament. EU anti-corruption report. Retrieved from
  32. Fletcher, K. C., & Abbas, A. E. (2018). A value measure for public-sector enterprise risk management: A TSA case study. Risk Analysis, 38(5), 991–1008. Scholar
  33. Fone, M., & Young, P. C. (2000). Managing risk in public organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach (Vol. 1). Boston: Pitman.
  35. Gajewski, J. F., & Li, L. (2015). Can Internet-based disclosure reduce information asymmetry? Advances in Accounting, 31(1), 115–124. Scholar
  36. Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Thematic coding and categorizing. In G. R. Gibbs (Ed.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 38–56). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Gillham, B. (2005). Research interviewing: The range of techniques. A practical guide. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  38. Halachmi, A. (2003). Governance and risk management: The challenge of accountability, transparency and social responsibility. International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), 67–76. Scholar
  39. Hinna, A., Gnan, L., & Monteduro, F. (2016). Governance and performance in public and non-profit organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing. Retrieved from
  40. Hinna, A., Scarozza, D., & Rotundi, F. (2018). Implementing risk management in the Italian public sector: Hybridization between old and new practices. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(2), 110–128. Scholar
  41. Holzmann, R., & Jørgensen, S. (2001). Social risk management: A new conceptual framework for social protection, and beyond. International Tax and Public Finance, 8(4), 529–556. Scholar
  42. Hood, J., & Smith, T. (2013). Perceptions of quantifiable benefits of local authority risk management. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(4), 309–319. Scholar
  43. Janesick, V. J. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatry, and meaning. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209–219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M., & Ellstrand, A. E. (1996). Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 22(3), 409–438. Scholar
  45. Jones, L. P. (2009). Public enterprise in less-developed countries. Cambridge: Cambridge Books.Google Scholar
  46. Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2002). Public values lost? Comparing cases on contracting out from Denmark and the United States. Public Management Review, 4(1), 63–81. Scholar
  47. Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381. Scholar
  48. Ke, Y., Wang, S., & Chan, A. P. C. (2010). Risk allocation in public-private partnership infrastructure projects: Comparative study. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 16(4), 343–351. Scholar
  49. Kettl, D. F. (2002). The transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty-first century America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Koppell, J. G. S. (2007). Political control for China’s state-owned enterprises: Lessons from America’s experience with hybrid organizations. Governance, 20(2), 255–278. Scholar
  51. Krishnamurti, C., Shams, S., & Velayutham, E. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and corruption risk: A global perspective. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 14(1), 1–21. Scholar
  52. Krueger, A. O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking. American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303.
  53. Lambsdorff, G., & Johann. (2005). Consequences and causes of corruption: What do we know from a cross-section of countries? Passauer Diskussionspapiere, Volkswirtschaftliche Reihe. Retrieved from
  54. Lapsley, I. (2009). New public management: The cruellest invention of the human spirit? Abacus, 45(1), 1–21. Scholar
  55. Locke, R., Leach, C., Kitsell, F., & Griffith, J. (2011). The impact on the workload of the ward manager with the introduction of administrative assistants. Journal of Nursing Management, 19(2), 177–185.Google Scholar
  56. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712. Scholar
  57. McCrae, M., & Balthazor, L. (2000). Integrating risk management into corporate governance: The Turnbull guidance. Risk Management, 2(3), 35–45.Google Scholar
  58. Mercer, D., Leschine, T., Drew, C. H., Griffith, W., & Nyerges, T. (2005). Public agencies and environmental risk: Organizing knowledge in a democratic context. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), 129–147. Scholar
  59. Miller, P., Kurunmäki, L., & O’Leary, T. (2008). Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7–8), 942–967. Scholar
  60. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. In Classics of public administration (pp. 549–561). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from
  61. Moss, D. A. (2004). When all else fails: Government as the ultimate risk manager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Retrieved from
  62. Mulgan, R. (2000). “Accountability”: An ever-expanding concept? Public Administration, 78(3), 555–573. Scholar
  63. Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1991). The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 503–530. Scholar
  64. Nisar, T. M. (2007). Risk management in public-private partnership contracts. Public Organization Review, 7(1), 1–19. Scholar
  65. OECD. (2014). Boosting integrity and fighting corruption. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. New York: Routledge. Retrieved from
  67. Otley, D., & Berry, T. (1998). Case study research in management accounting and control. Accounting Education, 7, 105–128.Google Scholar
  68. Oulasvirta, L., & Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2017). Adoption of comprehensive risk management in local government. Local Government Studies, 43(3), 451–474. Scholar
  69. Parker, L. D. (2012). Qualitative management accounting research: Assessing deliverables and relevance. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(1), 54–70.Google Scholar
  70. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis—New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Raz, T., & Hillson, D. (2005). A comparative review of risk management standards. Risk Management, 7(4), 53–66. Scholar
  72. Rhineberger, G. M., Hartmann, D. J., & Van Valey, T. L. (2005). Triangulated research designs—A justification? Journal of Applied Sociology, 22(1), 56–66. Scholar
  73. Romzek, B. S., LeRoux, K., & Blackmar, J. M. (2012). A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 442–453. Scholar
  74. Roper, J., & Schoenberger-Orgad, M. (2011). State-owned enterprises: Issues of accountability and legitimacy. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 693–709. Scholar
  75. Salvato, C., & Corbetta, G. (2013). Transitional leadership of advisors as a facilitator of successors’ leadership construction. Family Business Review, 26(3), 235–255.Google Scholar
  76. Sapienza, P. (2004). The effects of government ownership on bank lending. Journal of Financial Economics, 72(2), 357–384. Scholar
  77. Silver, H. (1995). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. Hilary International Labour Review, 1336(5). Retrieved from
  78. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  79. Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  80. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  81. Sun, W., & Cui, K. (2014). Linking corporate social responsibility to firm default risk. European Management Journal, 32(2), 275–287. Scholar
  82. Thompson, F., & Rizova, P. (2015). Understanding and creating public value: Business is the engine, government the flywheel (and also the regulator). Public Management Review, 17(4), 565–586. Scholar
  83. Vincent, J. (1996). Managing risk in public services: A review of the international literature. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(2), 57–64.Google Scholar
  84. Wong, S. C. Y. (2004). Improving corporate governance in SOEs: An integrated approach. Corporate Governance International, 7(2), 11.Google Scholar
  85. Woods, M. (2011). Risk management in organizations: An integrated case study approach. New York: Routledge. Scholar
  86. Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  87. Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334. Scholar
  88. Zardari, S. (2009). Software risk management. In Proceedings—2009 International Conference on Information Management and Engineering, ICIME 2009 (pp. 375–379). IEEE.
  89. Zif, J. (1981). Managerial strategic behavior in state-owned enterprises—Business and political orientations. Management Science, 27(11), 1326–1339. Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paola De Bernardi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesca Ricciardi
    • 1
  • Canio Forliano
    • 1
  • E. Sorano
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations