Advertisement

Seeing Each Other

  • Eva Schuermann
Chapter
Part of the Performance Philosophy book series (PPH)

Abstract

The qualitative differences between seeing persons and seeing objects consist in the mutuality of seeing. While the power of the gaze to constitute identity is clearly delineated by Sartre, Lévinas shows how we cannot see a human face as an arbitrary object. Both theories, however, constitute regressions from Merleau-Ponty’s conception of the gaze as interlacing, in which the active and the receptive are always united. In Merleau-Ponty’s argument, the logical structure of reversibility assumes the place of both Sartre’s dichotomy and Lévinas’ asymmetry, and therefore offers a more just account of the ambiguity of seeing than subject-object thinking does.

References

  1. Bertnet, Rudolf. 1998. Das Phänomen und das Unsichtbare. Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie 1: 15–30.Google Scholar
  2. Buisine, Alain. 1986. Laideur de Sartre. Lille: Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar
  3. Busch, Kathrin. 2004. Geschicktes Geben. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
  4. Cremonini, Andreas. 2004. Die Durchquerung des Cogito. Munic: Fink.Google Scholar
  5. Derrida, Jacques. 2001. Writing and Difference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Descombes, V. 1981. Das Selbe und das Andere. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  7. Fleischer, Margot. 2001. Das ursprüngliche Verhältnis zum Anderen bei Sartre (“Der Blick”) und die unverzichtbare Gegenposition Fichtes. In Transzendenz und Existenz, ed. Manfred Baum and Klaus Hammacher, 61–100. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.Google Scholar
  8. Gondek, Hans-Dieter. 1997. Der Blick zwischen Sartre und Lacan. RISS 37/38: 175–196.Google Scholar
  9. Held, René. 1952. Psychopathologie du regard. In L’évolution psychiatrique, April/June, 222–254.Google Scholar
  10. Kapust, Antje. 1999. Berührung ohne Berührung. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
  11. Lacan, Jacques. 1978. Of the Gaze as Objet Petit a. In The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, Book 11, 67–119. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Lévinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and Infinity. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Lévinas, Emmanuel. 1987. Collected Philosophical Papers. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Lévinas, Emmanuel. 1991. Otherwise Than Being or Beyond Essence. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  15. Lévinas, Emmanuel. 1999. Die Spur des Anderen. Freiburg: Alber.Google Scholar
  16. Lévinas, Emmanuel. 2003. Signification and Sense. In Humanism of the Other. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  17. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Platon. 2003. Platonis Respublica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Plessner, Helmuth. 1982. Trieb und Leidenschaft. In Mit anderen Augen, 110–123. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  20. Plessner, Helmuth. 1983. Über Menschenverachtung. In Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. VIII, 105–116. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  21. Plessner, Helmuth. 1998. Zur Anthropologie der Nachahmung. In Anthropologie, ed. Gunter Gebauer, 176–184. Leipzig: Reclam.Google Scholar
  22. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1982. The Look. In Being and Nothingness, 340–400. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  23. Strauss, Erwin. 1956. Vom Sinn der Sinne. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Tholen, Georg Christoph. 2003. Die Zäsur der Medien. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
  25. Valéry, Paul. 1970. Odds and Ends. In The Collected Works of Paul Valéry, Vol. 14, 1–156. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Von der Heiden, Anne et al. (eds.). 2005. Blickzähmung und Augentäuschung. Berlin: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
  27. Waldenfels, Bernhard. 1995. Verflechtung und Trennung. In Deutsch-Französische Gedankengänge, 346–382. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  28. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1980. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology, Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Schuermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Otto-von-Guericke UniversityMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations