Advertisement

Aesthetic and Ethical World Disclosure

  • Eva Schuermann
Chapter
Part of the Performance Philosophy book series (PPH)

Abstract

What is seeing, when people see each other, when we are visible and being looked at? Human visibility is necessarily social visibility, since humans appear to each other, display themselves. With our partly involuntary and partly chosen outer image we show ourselves to the others and offer ourselves to be perceived by them. The performative dimension is here accounted for as an activity entailing realising and configuring effects that constitute self and world relations by means of perceptions and inner images. This leads to a discussion of the aesthetic freedom entailed by creative aspect-seeing and the ethical responsibilities involved in social visibility.

References

  1. Aldrich, Virgil Charles. 1996. Visuelle Metapher. In Theorie der Metapher, ed. Anselm Haverkamp, 142–162. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, Melissa et al. 2006. Cues of Being Watched Enhance Cooperation in a Real-world Setting. Biology Letters 2.3: 412–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, Marcus. 2006. Scharfer Blick Augen-Plakate schrecken Egoisten ab. Spiegel-Online, 28 June. http://www.spiegel.de/wissenschaft/mensch/0,1518,423887,00.html. Accessed 2 July 2006.
  4. Blumenberg, Hans. 2010. Paradigms for a Metaphorology. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1997. Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, Judith. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cason, Hulsey. 1930. Common Annoyances: A Psychological Study of Every-Day Aversions and Irritations. Psychological Monograms 40.2: 1–218.Google Scholar
  9. Davidson, Donald. 1984. What Metaphors Mean. In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gamm, Gerhard. 1992. Die Macht der Metapher: Im Labyrinth der modernen Welt. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
  11. Hester, Marcus. 1966. Metaphor and Aspect Seeing. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 25: 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jaspers, Karl. 1994. Psychologie der Weltanschauungen. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
  13. Kertscher, Jens. 2004. Von der Metapher zur Bildmetapher. In Wittgenstein und die Metapher, ed. Ulrich Arnswald, Jens Kertscher, and Matthias Kroß, 165–194. Berlin: Parerga Verlag.Google Scholar
  14. Lacan, Jacques. 2004. Écrits: A Selection. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  15. Lüdeking, Karlheinz. 1996. Die Wörter und die Bilder und die Dinge. In René Magritte. Ausstellungskatalog, 58–72. Munich: Prestel.Google Scholar
  16. Mattenklott, Gert. 2001. Ähnlichkeit. In Ästhetik des Ähnlichen, ed. Gerald Funk, Gert Mattenklott, and Michael Pauen, 167–183. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
  17. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. Eye and Mind. In The Primacy of Perception. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1999. On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense. In The Birth of Tragedy and Other Writings, 139–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Pines, Malcolm. 1985. Mirroring and Child Development. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 5: 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prange, Regine. 2001. Der Verrat der Bilder. Freiburg: Rombach.Google Scholar
  21. Rorty, Richard. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Scherer, Christiane. 2001. Das Sichtbare und das Unsichtbare. In Ästhetik des Ähnlichen, ed. Gerald Funk, Gert Mattenklott, and Michael Pauen, 189–216. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
  23. Schulte, Joachim. 1990. Metaphern und sekundäre Bedeutung. In Chor und Gesetz, 104–112. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  24. Strub, Christian. 1991. Kalkulierte Absurditäten. Munich: Alber.Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, Charles. 1985. What Is Agency? In Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1, 15–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Wheeler III, Samuel C. 2004. Wittgenstein mit Davidson über Metaphern. In Wittgenstein und die Metapher, ed. Ulrich Arnswald et al., 195–220. Berlin: Parerga Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Winnicott, Donald W. 1999. Mirror-Role of Mother and Family in Child Development. In Playing and Reality, 111–118. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1986. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Wollheim, Richard. 1991. Die Metapher in der Malerei. In Bilder der Philosophie, ed. R. Heinrich & H. Vetter, 17–32. Wien: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Schuermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Otto-von-Guericke UniversityMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations