Advertisement

Global Trends in Facing the Triple Ds: Dynamics, Challenges, and Opportunities

  • Thorsten WiechmannEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of selected demographic and economic challenges for local communities in America, Europe, and East Asia. Special attention is given to ongoing processes of depopulation and deindustrialization. These trends are well known in many countries, but all too often thought of and treated separately. Instead, these trends have to be understood in their interactions, and integrated strategies of inclusive development have to be implemented to deal with urban shrinkage. The shrinking cities phenomenon represents a major challenge to review the principles upon which urban policy has traditionally been based. Creative and flexible urban strategies that consider the local and national contexts are needed in highly uncertain environments. A realistic view might focus on inclusive development instead of reversing economic decline in one-sided GDP growth.

Bibliography

  1. Allweil, Y. (2007). Shrinking Cities: Like a Slow-Motion Katrina. Places, 19(1), 91–93.Google Scholar
  2. American Assembly (Ed.). (2011). Reinventing America’s Legacy Cities. Strategies for Cities Losing Population. New York: American Assembly.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, M., Cunningham-Sabot, E., Grasland, C., Rivière, D., & van Hamme, G. (Eds.). (2010). Villes et régions européennes en décroissance, maintenir la cohésion territoriale. Paris: Hermès-Sciences.Google Scholar
  4. Beauregard, R. A. (2003). Voices of Decline: The Post-war Fate of US Cities (2nd ed.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Beauregard, R. A. (2009). Urban Population Loss in Historical Perspective: United States, 1820–2000. Environment and Planning A, 41, 514–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blotevogel, H. H., & King, R. (1996). European Economic Restructuring: Demographic Responses and Feedbacks. European Urban and Regional Studies, 3, 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Booth, D. (1987). Regional Long Waves and Urban Policy. Urban Studies, 24, 447–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, C. (1940). The Conditions of Economic Progress. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Colby, S. L., & Ortman, J. M. (2015). Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060. Population Estimates and Projections. U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from https://census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.pdf
  10. Daniels, P. W. (2017). Deindustrialisation. In D. Richardson et al. (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Geography. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  11. Dewar, M., & Thomas, J. M. (Eds.). (2012). The City After Abandonment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  12. Doussard, M., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2009). After Deindustrialization: Uneven Growth and Economic Inequality in ‘Postindustrial’ Chicago. Economic Geography, 85(2), 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Felipe, J., & Mehta, A. (2016). Deindustrialization? A Global Perspective. Economics Letters, 149, 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Felipe, J., Mehta, A., & Rhee, C. (2014). Manufacturing Matters, but It’s the Jobs That Count (Economics and Research Department Working Paper # 420). Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, A. G. B. (1939). Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Production. Economic Record, 15(28), 24–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fol, S., & Cunningham-Sabot, E. (2010). ‘Déclin urbain’ et Shrinking Cities: une évaluation critique des approches de la décroissance urbaine. Annales de géographie, 4(674), 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fourastié, J. (1949). Le grand espoir du XXème siècle. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  18. Friedrichs, J. (1993). A Theory of Urban Decline: Economy, Demography and Political Elites. Urban Studies, 30(6), 907–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gershuny, J., & Miles, I. D. (1983). The New Service Economy: The Transformation of Employment in Industrial Societies. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, P. (1993). Forces Shaping Urban Europe. Urban Studies, 30(6), 883–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Häußermann, H., & Siebel, W. (1987). Neue Urbanität. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Hesse, J. J. (Ed.). (1988). Regional Structural Change and Industrial Policy in International Perspective: United States, Great Britain, France, Federal Republic of Germany. Baden-Baden: NOMOS.Google Scholar
  23. Hollander, J. B., & Németh, J. (2011). The Bounds of Smart Decline: A Foundational Theory for Planning Shrinking Cities. Housing Policy Debate, 21(3), 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hollander, J., Pallagst, K., Schwarz, T., & Popper, F. (2009). Planning Shrinking Cities. Progress in Planning, Special Issue: Emerging Research Areas, 72(4), 223–232.Google Scholar
  25. Mackun, P., & Wilson, S. (2011). Population Distribution and Change: 2000 to 2010. U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-01.pdf
  26. Martin, R., & Rowthorn, B. (1986). The Geography of De-industrialisation. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meijer, M. (1993). Growth and Decline of European Cities: Changing Positions of Cities in Europe. Urban Studies, 30(6), 981–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pallagst, K. et al. (Eds.) (2009). The Future of Shrinking Cities: Problems, Patterns and Strategies of Urban Transformation in a Global Context. Center for Global Metropolitan Studies, UC Berkeley, Monograph Series.Google Scholar
  29. Popper, D., & Popper, F. (2002). Small Can Be Beautiful: Coming to Terms with Decline. Planning, 68(7), 20–23.Google Scholar
  30. Reckien, D., & Martinez-Fernandez, C. (2011). Why Do Cities Shrink? European Planning Studies, 9(8), 1375–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rowthorn, R. E., & Coutts, K. (2004). De-industrialisation and the Balance of Payments. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28(5), 767–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rugare, S., & Schwarz, T. (Eds.). (2008). Cities Regrowing Smaller. Cleveland: Urban Infill book series.Google Scholar
  33. Schatz, L. (2010). What Helps or Hinders the Adoption of “Good Planning” Principles in Shrinking Cities? A Comparison of Recent Planning Exercises in Sudbury, Ontario and Youngstown, Ohio. Online published: http://hdl.handle.net/10012/5199
  34. Thompson, W. (1965). Urban Economic Growth and Development in a National System of Cities. In P. H. Hauser & L. F. Schnore (Eds.), The Study of Urbanization (pp. 431–490). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Turok, I., & Mykhnenko, V. (2007). The Trajectories of European Cities, 1960–2005. Cities, 24(3), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. UN-HABITAT. (2008). State of the world’s Cities: 2008/2009: Harmonious Cities. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  37. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2014). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). New York.Google Scholar
  38. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2016). The World’s Cities in 2016, Data Booklet (ST/ESA/SER.A/392). New York.Google Scholar
  39. van de Kaa, D. (1987). Europe’s Second Demographic Transition. Population Bulletin, 42, 1–57.Google Scholar
  40. van den Berg, L., Drewett, R., Klaasen, L., Rossi, A., & Vijverberg, H. (1982). Urban Europe: A Study of Growth and Decline. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  41. van Neuss, L. (2016, August 2). The Economic Forces Behind Deindustrialization: An Empirical Investigation (eprint/Working Paper). Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2817332
  42. WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change). (2011). World in Transition: A Social Contract for Sustainability (Flagship Report 2011). Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.wbgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wbgu.de/templates/dateien/veroeffentlichungen/hauptgutachten/jg2011/wbgu_jg2011_en.pdf
  43. WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change). (2016). Humanity on the Move: Unlocking the Transformative Power of Cities (Flagship Report 2016). Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.wbgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wbgu.de/templates/dateien/veroeffentlichungen/hauptgutachten/hg2016/hg2016_en.pdf
  44. Wiechmann, T., & Bontje, M. (2015). Responding to Tough Times: Policy and Planning Strategies in Shrinking Cities. European Planning Studies, 23(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wiechmann, T., & Pallagst, K. (2012). Urban Shrinkage in Germany and the USA: A Comparison of Transformation Patterns and Local Strategies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(2), 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wiechmann, T., Volkmann, A., & Schmitz, S. (2013). Making Places in Increasingly Empty Spaces: Dealing with Shrinkage in Post-Socialist Cities: The Example of East Germany. In K. Pallagst, T. Wiechmann, & C. Martinez (Eds.), Shrinking Cities: International Perspectives and Policy Implications, Routledge Advances in Geography (Vol. 8, pp. 125–146). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Wolff, M. (2018). Uneven Urban Dynamics: The Role of Urban Shrinkage and Regrowth in Europe. PhD Thesis, School of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, January 2018.  https://doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-19066
  48. Wolff, M., & Wiechmann, T. (2015). Machbarkeitsstudie Demographische Typisierung auf europäischer Ebene. Endbericht an die Bertelsmann Stiftung. Dortmund/Leipzig.Google Scholar
  49. Wolff, M., & Wiechmann, T. (2018). Urban Growth and Decline: Europe’s Shrinking Cities in a Comparative Perspective 1990–2010. European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(2), 122–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. World Economic Forum (Ed.). (2018). The Inclusive Development Index 2018. Summary and Data Highlights. Eprint. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Forum_IncGrwth_2018.pdf

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TU DortmundDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations