Advertisement

Spread and Control of Misinformation with Heterogeneous Agents

  • Pedro Cisneros-Velarde
  • Diego F. M. Oliveira
  • Kevin S. Chan
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)

Abstract

We consider an agent-based model to explore the mechanism behind the diffusion of low- and high-quality information in online social networks. In particular, we investigate how agents with heterogeneous criteria of quality affect the spread of low-quality information. We also propose a simple method for enhancing the spread of high-quality information without hindering the system’s information diversity. Our results show that the proposed solution mitigates the influence of malicious agents on the overall system’s quality, and also show how it controls low-quality information in the presence of agents with heterogeneous criteria of information’s quality assessment.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by ARL through ARO Grant W911NF-16-1-0524 and was accomplished under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-18-2-0066. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Army Research Laboratory or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation here on.

References

  1. 1.
    Shearer, E., Gottfried, J.: News use across social media platforms 2017, Pew Research Center, Journalism & MediaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mendoza, M., Poblete, B., Castillo, C.: Twitter under crisis: can we trust what we RT? In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics, pp. 71–79. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Gupta, H. Lamba, P. Kumaraguru, A. Joshi, Faking Sandy: characterizing and identifying fake images on Twitter during hurricane Sandy. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 729–736. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Starbird, K., Maddock, J., Orand, M., Achterman, P., Mason, R.M.: Rumors, false flags, and digital vigilantes: misinformation on Twitter after the 2013 Boston marathon bombing. In: Conference 2014 ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Domm, P.: False rumor of explosion at White House causes stocks to briefly plunge; AP confirms its Twitter feed was hacked. http://bit.ly/Complenet19 (2013). Accessed 27 Nov 2018
  6. 6.
    Tambuscio, M., Oliveira, D.F., Ciampaglia, G.L., Ruffo, G.: Network segregation in a model of misinformation and fact-checking. J. Comput. Soc. Sci. 1(2), 261–275 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lerman, K.: Information is not a virus, and other consequences of human cognitive limits. Futur. Internet 8(2), 21 (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Domenico, M., Lima, A., Mougel, P., Musolesi, M.: The anatomy of a scientific rumor. Sci. Rep. 3, 2980 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sreenivasan, S., Chan, K.S., Swami, A., Korniss, G., Szymanski, B.K.: Information cascades in feed-based networks of users with limited attention. IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 4(2), 120–128 (2017)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weng, L., Menczer, F., Ahn, Y.-Y.: Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Sci. Rep. 3, 2522 (2013)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., Flammini, F.: The rise of social bots. Commun. ACM 59(7), 96–104 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kramer, A.D., Guillory, J.E., Hancock, J.T.: Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 8788–8790 (2014)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H.E., Quattrociocchi, W.: The spreading of misinformation online. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113(3), 554–559 (2016)ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lazer, D.M., Baum, M.A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A.J., Greenhill, K.M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M.J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., et al.: The science of fake news. Science 359(6380), 1094–1096 (2018)ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Qiu, X., Oliveira, D.F., Shirazi, A.S., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: Limited individual attention and online virality of low-quality information. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1(7), s41562–017 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oliveira, D.F., Chan, K.S., Leonel, E.D.: Scaling invariance in a social network with limited attention and innovation. Phys. Lett. A 382(47), 3376–3380 (2018)ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro Cisneros-Velarde
    • 1
  • Diego F. M. Oliveira
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kevin S. Chan
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Army Research LaboratoryAdelphiUSA
  3. 3.Network Science and Technology Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations