Advertisement

Bipolar Press-Fit Radial Head Arthroplasties: Surgical Technique and Expected Outcomes

  • Gianluca Bullitta
  • Giuseppe Giannicola
Chapter

Abstract

Several types of radial head prostheses have been designed and introduced in clinical practice over the last decades. Currently, radial head prostheses can be categorized according to the material (silicone, polyethylene, pyrocarbon, and metal), modularity (monoblock or modular), polarity (monopolar or bipolar), and method of stem fixation (cemented, loose-fit, expandable stem, and press-fit). The topic of this chapter is the bipolar press-fit radial head arthroplasties (RHA). Two types of this implant are described in the literature: (1) the press-fit RHS (Tornier, Montbonnot-Saint-Martin, France) and (2) the bipolar SBI (radial head implant, Small Bone Innovation, Morrisville, Pennsylvania, USA). The aims of this chapter are (1) to describe the surgical technique and (2) to report the clinical results yielded by these two types of implant. A bipolar press-fit radial head, i.e., Antea (Adler Ortho, Milano, Italy), has recently been marketed, though no studies have yet been published on this new device.

Keywords

Radial head Radial head arthroplasty Radial head fractures Bipolar radial head prosthesis Radial neck fractures 

References

  1. 1.
    Tarassoli P, McCann P, Amirfeyz R. Complex instability of the elbow. Injury. 2017;48(3):568–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Giannicola G, Sacchetti FM, Greco A, Cinotti G, Postacchini F. Management complex elbow instability. Musculoskelet Surg. 2010;94(Suppl 1):S25–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-010-0065-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Giannicola G, Polimanti D, Sacchetti FM, Scacchi M, Bullitta G, Manauzzi E, et al. Soft tissue constraint injuries in complex elbow instability: surgical techniques and clinical outcomes. Orthopedics. 2012;35(12):e1746–53.  https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20121120-19.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Acevedo DC, Paxton ES, Kukelyansky I, Abboud J, Ramsey M. Radial head arthroplasty: state of the art. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22(10):633–42.  https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-22-10-633.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Glabbeek F, Van Riet RP, Baumfeld JA, Neale PG, O’Driscoll SW, Morrey BF, An KN. Detrimental effects of overstuffing or understuffing with a radial head replacement in the medial collateral ligament deficient elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(12):2629–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frank SG, Grewal R, Johnson J, Faber KJ, King GJ, Athwal GS. Determination of correct implant size in radial head arthroplasty to avoid overlengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(7):1738–46.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01161.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rowland AS, Athwal GS, MacDermid JC, King GJ. Lateral ulnohumeral joint space widening is not diagnostic of radial head arthroplasty overstuffing. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(5):637–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Riet RP, van Glabbeek F, de Weerdt W, Oemar J, Bortier H. Validation of the lesser sigmoid notch of the ulna as a reference point for accurate placement of a prosthesis for the head of the radius: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(3):413–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abdulla I, Langohr GD, Gladwell M, Yeung C, Faber KJ, King GJ, Athwal GS. The effect of fracture comminution on the reliability and accuracy of radial head sizing. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2015;24(3):364–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morrey BF. Radial head prosthesis. In: Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery: The Elbow. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2014. p. 156–169–38.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leclerc AE, Deluce S, Ferreira L, Desai S, King GJ, Athwal GS. Measurements of the ipsilateral capitellum can reliably predict the diameter of the radial head. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2013;22(12):1724–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.06.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rotini R, Marinelli A, Guerra E, Bettelli G, Cavaciocchi M. Radial head replacement with unipolar and bipolar SBi system: a clinical and radiographic analysis after a 2-year mean follow-up. Musculoskelet Surg. 2012;96(Suppl 1):S69–79.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-012-0198-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kodde IF, Heijink A, Kaas L, Mulder PG, van Dijk CN, Eygendaal D. Press-fit bipolar radial head arthroplasty, midterm results. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25(8):1235–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chanlalit C, Shukla DR, Fitzsimmons JS, An KN, O’Driscoll SW. Stress shielding around radial head prostheses. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(10):2118–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kachooei AR, Baradaran A, Ebrahimzadeh MH, van Dijk CN, Chen N. The rate of radial head prosthesis removal or revision: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hand Surg Am. 2018;43(1):39–53.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.08.031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gianluca Bullitta
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Giannicola
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic Medicine and Orthopedic Sciences“Sapienza” University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations