Change in Quality of Life and Cost/Utility Analysis After Elbow Arthroplasty

  • Barbara Melis


Severe elbow arthropathy occurs most commonly in case of rheumatoid arthritis or other degenerative conditions and following intra-articular fractures. Elbow arthroplasty (EA) has the potential to improve pain, function, and quality of life for the patients with articular destruction. Nevertheless EA is a relatively uncommon surgery, and the survival and complication rates are still not as favorable as those following arthroplasties in other joints. Recent studies indicate an increase in the number of EA procedures performed. In the patients who had undergone EA, some specific functions remained significantly impaired but appeared not to play a decisive role in the performance of tasks of daily living and perception of quality of life in general. Pain reduction is the most important factor affecting quality of life improvement. EA shows a satisfactory cost/utility ratio, which may justify an increase in health spending in this area to reduce the social costs of lingering elbow arthropathy. Continued advances in this field are key to make this operation as reliable and lasting as hip or knee arthroplasty.


Elbow Arthroplasty Quality of life Cost/utility analysis 


  1. 1.
    Welsink CL, Lambers KTA, van Deurzen DFP, Eygendaal D, van den Bekerom MPJ. Total elbow arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Rev. 2017. doi: Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schoch BS, Werthel JD, Sánchez-Sotelo J, Morrey BF, Morrey M. Total elbow arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017;26(8):1355–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhou H, Orvets ND, Merlin G, Shaw J, Dines JS, Price MD, Eichinger JK, Xinning L. Total elbow arthroplasty in the United States: evaluation of cost, patient demographics, and complication rates. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2016;8(1):6113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Day JS, Lau E, Ong KL, Williams GR, Ramsey ML, Kurtz SM. Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2010;19(8):1115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gay DM, Lyman S, Do H, et al. Indications and reoperation rates for total elbow arthroplasty: an analysis of trends in New York state. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:110–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kraay MJ, Figgie MP, Inglis AE, et al. Primary semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. Survival analysis of 113 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76B:636–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giannicola G, Bullitta G, Sacchetti FM, Scacchi M, Polimanti D, Citoni G, Cinotti G. Change in quality of life and cost/utility analysis in open stage-related surgical treatment of elbow stiffness. Orthopedics. 2013;36(7):e923–30. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Angst F, John M, Pap G, Mannion AF, Herren DB, Flury M, Aeschlimann A, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR. Comprehensive assessment of clinical outcome and quality of life after total elbow arthroplasty. Arthritis and Care. 2005;53(1):73–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Melis
    • 1
  1. 1.Unità di Ortopedia e Traumatologia dello SportCasa di Cura “Policlinico Città di Quartu”Quartu Sant’ElenaItaly

Personalised recommendations