Blockchain for Open Data – Exploring Conceptual Underpinnings and Practice

  • Bwalya Kelvin JosephEmail author
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 31)


There has been a sustainable development of the concept of blockchain as one of the key technology innovations changing the business landscapes. Blockchain has been used as a lever for enforcing accountability and responsiveness in different contemporary information and knowledge management environments. The core principle of blockchain is that it promotes the use of technology tools and platforms to achieve anonymous vetting of integrity for different types of information. Together with relatively new concepts such as Open Data, blockchain stands a chance to be practically utilised in different socio-economic establishments. The synthesis of blockchain and Open Data presently opens up requisite implementation of Freedom of Information (FoI) bills which many countries around the world have enacted into laws. A lot of researchers are jumping onto the bandwagon of exploring ways of how blockchain can be used in solving contemporary complex human problems. As a result, a lot of conceptual designs and underpinnings are coming up everyday from both practitioners and researchers. Anchoring the philosophical underpinning on descriptive informetrics, this chapter employs a focused and detailed bibliometric analysis of work that has been published in applied scholarly and practical outlets such as in Scorpus, Emerald, Elsevier, journals, etc., to delve deeper into the contours of blockchain. The chapter discusses formulaic definitions and concepts surrounding blockchain and Open Data with a special focus in the integration of the two concepts for practical application in real-world environments. It is hoped that exploring the formulaic underpinnings of blockchain and Open Data will open up avenues for consolidating their usage into the different contextual socio-economic set-ups.


  1. Alphand, O., Amoretti, M., Claeys, T., Dall’Asta, S., & Duda, A., et al. (2018). IoTChain: A blockchain security architecture for the internet of things. IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Apr 2018, Barcelona, Spain. hal-01705455.Google Scholar
  2. Hileman, G., & Rauchs, M. (2017). Global blockchain benchmarking study. Online: Accessed 14 Dec 2018.
  3. Hyperledger. (2017). Introduction to Hyperledger business blockchain design philosophy and consensus. Online: Accessed 14 Dec 2018.
  4. Izdebski, K. (2015). Transparency and open data principles: Why they are important and how they increase public participation and tackle corruption. Online: Accessed 14 Dec 2018.
  5. Jaikaran, C. (2018). Blockchain: Background and policy issues. Online: Accessed 7 Dec 2018.
  6. Jun, M. S. (2018). Blockchain government - a next form of infrastructure for the twenty-first century, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(7), 1–12.Google Scholar
  7. Kikitamara, S. (2017). Digital identity management on blockchain for open model energy system. Unpublished Masters thesis – Information Science.Google Scholar
  8. Personen, L., & Koistinen, M. (2017). Employing the principles of My Data and blockchain in building trust in farm data sharing. MACS-G20 Workshop, Berlin.Google Scholar
  9. Third, A., & Domingue, J. (2017a). Linked data indexing of distributed ledgers. Online: Accessed 14 Dec 2018.
  10. Third, A., & Domingue, J. (2017b). LinkChains: Exploring the space of decentralised trustworthy Linked Data. Online: Accessed 6 Dec 2018.
  11. Zhang, M., & Ji, Y. (2018). Blockchain for healthcare records: A data perspective. Online: Accessed 3 Dec 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Consumer Intelligence and Information Systems, University of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations