Advertisement

Posterior Segment

  • Marcus H. Colyer
  • Eric D. Weichel
Chapter

Abstract

Injuries to the posterior segment are among the most complex to diagnose, challenging to effectively treat, and often become the defining injury to predict visual outcome. In order to effectively diagnose and treat these injuries, clear multidisciplinary communication and coordination are essential. Additionally, management of posterior segment injuries may require adaptation to traditional surgical approaches in order to achieve the optimal visual outcome.

Keywords

Open globe Rupture Macular hole IOFB Vitrectomy Retinal detachment 

Notes

Disclaimer

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones of the author/speaker and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of Defense, the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, or any other agency of the U.S. Government.

References

  1. 1.
    Weichel ED, Colyer MH. Combat ocular trauma and systemic injury. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(6):519–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Colyer MH, Weichel ED, Dick JS, Bower KS, Ward TP, Haller JA. Delayed intraocular foreign body removal without endophthamitis during Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(8):1439–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colyer MH, Chun DW, Bower KS, Dick JS, Weichel ED. Perforating globe injuries during operation Iraqi Freedom. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(11):2087–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weichel ED, Colyer MH. Traumatic macular holes secondary to combat ocular trauma. Retina. 2009;29(3):349–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weichel ED, Bower KS, Colyer MH. Chorioretinectomy for perforating or severe intraocular foreign body injuries. Graeves Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;248(3):319–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thompson JT, Parver LM, Enger CL, Meiler WF, Liggett PE, National Eye Trauma System. Infectious endophthalmitis after penetrating injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology. 1995;100(10):1468–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bhagat N, Nagori S, Zarbin M. Post-traumatic infectious endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56(3):238–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yonekawa Y, Hacker HD, Lehman RE, Beal CJ, Veldman PB, Vyas NM, Shah AS, Wu D, Eliott D, Gardiner MF, Kuperwaser MC, Rosa RH, Ramsey JE, Miller JW, Mazzoli RA, Lawrence MG, Arroyo JG. Ocular blast injuries in mass-casualty incidents. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yeung L, Chen TL, Kuo YH, Chao AN, Wu WC, Chen KJ, Hwang YS, Chen YP, Lai CC. Severe vitreous hemorrhage associated with closed globe injury. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:52–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berlin R. Sogenannten commotio retinae. So-called commotio retinae. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1873;1:42–78.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Von Graefe A. Ze Falle von Rupture der Choroida. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1854;1:402.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ament CS, Zacks DN, Lane AM, Krzystolik M, D'Amico DJ, Mukai S, Young LH, Loewenstein J, Arroyo J, Miller JW. Predictors of visual outcome and choroidal neovascular membrane formation after traumatic choroidal rupture. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2006;124(7):957–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nair U, Soman M, Ganekal S, Batmanabane V, Nair K. Morphological patterns of indirect choroidal rupture on spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 2013;7:1503.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weinstock SJ, Morin JD. Traumatic macular hole. Can J Opthalmol. 1976;11:249–51.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams DF, Mieler WF, Williams GA. Posterior segment manifestations of ocular trauma. Retina. 1990;10(Suppl):S35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ahmad B, Shah G, Engelbrecht N, Thomas M, Smith B. Chapter 24: Retinal detachment repair: scleral buckling procedures. In: Ichhpujani P, Spaeth G, Yanoff M, editors. Expert techniques in ophthalmic surgery. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Jaypee Hights Medical Pub Inc; 2015. p. 224.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yeh S, Colyer MH, Weichel ED. Current trends in the management of intraocular foreign bodies. Current Opin Ophthalmol. 2008;19(3):225–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chun DW, Colyer MH, Wroblewski KJ. Visual and anatomic outcomes of vitrectomy with temporary keratoprosthesis or endoscopy in ocular trauma with opaque cornea. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2012;43(4):302–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcus H. Colyer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eric D. Weichel
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.LTC, MC, US Army, Ophthalmology Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical CenterBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesBethesdaUSA
  3. 3.LTC, MC, US Army, Department of SurgeryUniformed Services University of the Health SciencesBethesdaUSA
  4. 4.The Retina Group of WashingtonGreenbeltUSA

Personalised recommendations