Advertisement

From Houses and Grandparents to Brexit: Connections Between Memory, Objects and Right-Wing Populism

  • Ana Carolina Balthazar
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter considers the perspectives and actions of some Brexit supporters. The data presented here is part of a long-term ethnographic research among financially stable retired residents of Margate, South East England, and nearby areas. Here, right-wing populism relates to a national perspective that ordinary people continuously reproduce in their trips to the local charity shop, around town, at their homes and in politics. Within this context, support for Brexit produces a sense of belonging that directly relates to the area’s material history. Support also works as a protest against those who insist to ignore the British past, which is directly connected to peoples’ memories and relatives. Among my informants, Brexit is much less extremist than outsiders might imagine. An ethnographic approach to voters helps to disentangle the multiple voices that got aggregated under the populist empty signifiers, deconstructing its simplistic logic and hopefully enlightening potential fields for negotiation.

Keywords

Populism Brexit Nationalism United Kingdom Belonging Memory Objects 

References

  1. Balthazar, A.C. 2016. Old Things with Character: The Fetishization of Objects in Margate, UK. Journal of Material Culture 21 (4): 448–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2017. Made in Britain: Brexit, Teacups, and the Materiality of the Nation. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BBC News. 2015. UKIP Leader Nigel Farage Warns of EU “Open-Door Policy”. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-politics-34361110/ukip-leader-nigel-farage-warns-of-eu-open-door-policy. Last accessed 4 Oct 2018.
  4. Clegg, N. 2017. How To Stop Brexit (And Make Britain Great Again). London: Bodley Head.Google Scholar
  5. Degnen, C. 2005. Relationality, Place, and Absence: A Three-Dimensional Perspective on Social Memory. The Sociological Review 53: 729–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dennet, A., and J. Stillwell. 2011. A New Area Classification for Understanding Internal Migration in Britain. Office for National Statistics, Population Trends No. 145.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, J. 2000. Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, J., G. Evans, and K. Smith. 2012. Introduction: The Middle Classification of Britain. Focaal—Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 62: 3–16.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, G. 2017. Why We Are All Postindustrial Now. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman, J., ed. 2003. Globalization, the State, and Violence. Walnut Creek: AltaMira.Google Scholar
  11. Gingrich, A., and M. Banks, eds. 2006. Neo-nationalism in Europe and Beyond: Perspectives from Social Anthropology. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  12. Gusterson, Hugh. 2017. Brexit to Trump. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnston, R. 2000. Introduction. In The Changing Geography of the UK, ed. V. Gardiner and H. Matthews, 3rd ed., 1–8. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Judis, John B. 2016. The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics. New York: Columbia Global Reports.Google Scholar
  15. Kalb, D. 2009. Conversations with a Polish Populist: Tracing Hidden Histories of Globalization, Class and Dispossession in Post-socialism (and Beyond). American Ethnologist 36 (2): 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laclau, E. 2005. Populism: What’s in a Name? In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, ed. F. Panizza, 32–49. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Lawler, Steph. 2012. White Like Them: Whiteness and Anachronistic Space in Representations of the English White Working Class. Ethnicities 12 (4): 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lees, L., and J. McKiernan. 2014. Art-Led Regeneration in Margate: Learning from Moonbow Jakes Café and Lido Nightclub Intervention. Art and the Public Sphere, 2 (1-3): 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Macdonald, S. 2002. On “Old Things”: The Fetishization of Past Everyday Life. In British Subjects: An Anthropology of Britain, ed. N. Rapport, 89–106. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  20. Mann, R., and S. Fenton. 2017. Nation, Class and Resentment: The Politics of National Identity in England, Scotland and Wales. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2004. The English Indices of Deprivation. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6320/1870718.pdf. Last accessed 3 Sept 2015.
  23. Panizza, F. 2005. Introduction: Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, ed. F. Panizza, 1–31. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  24. Thorleifsson, C. 2016. From Coal to Ukip: The Struggle Over Identity in Postindustrial Doncaster. History and Anthropology 27 (5): 555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tyler, Katharine. 2015. Attachments and Connections: A ‘White Working-Class’ English Family’s Relationships with Their BrAsian ‘Pakistani’ Neighbours. Ethnic and Racial Studies 38 (7): 1169–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walley, C. 2017. What the U.S. Election Focus on the ‘White Working Class’ Missed. American Ethnologist 44 (2): 231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Carolina Balthazar
    • 1
  1. 1.Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations