Novel Model Reference Adaptive Control Designed by a Lyapunov Function That is Kept at Low Value by Fixed Point Iteration
Even in our days the generally prevailing methodology used for designing adaptive controllers is based on Lyapunov’s “direct method”. This statement holds for the special “Model Reference Adaptive Controllers (MRAC)”, too, that have to satisfy two typical requirements. Besides providing precise trajectory tracking they have to generate an illusion to an external control loop working on purely kinematic/kinetic basis that it controls a system the dynamic properties of which are identical to that of a “Reference System”. Based on the structure of the more or less plausible Lyapunov functions the Reference System used to be stable, linear, time-invariant. To evade the mathematical difficulties of the Lyapunov function-based design, as an alternative approach, “Fixed Point Iteration (FPI)”-based design technique was introduced that had a special MRAC variant, too. In this approach the usual restrictions for the dynamics of the Reference System were naturally released. Later it was shown that this adaptive approach can be interpreted from the point of view of the Lyapunov functions in which non-conventional feedback terms are used for driving the Lyapunov function near zero and keeping it in its vicinity. This approach naturally gave rise to a novel MRAC design idea that is akin to that of the “Backstepping Controllers”. In this paper this idea is presented and illustrated via simulation investigations. Simulation results are provided regarding a completely driven 2 degree of freedom physical system, that consists of two nonlinearly coupled and nonlinearly damped mass-points.
This work has been partially supported by the Doctoral School of Applied Informatics and Applied Mathematics of Óbuda University.
- 5.J. Tar, J. Bitó, L. Nádai, J. Tenreiro Machado, Robust fixed point transformations in adaptive control using local basin of attraction. Acta Polytech. Hung. 6, 21–37 (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.J. Tar, J. Bitó, I. Rudas, Replacement of Lyapunov’s direct method in model reference adaptive control with robust fixed point transformations, in Proceeding of the 14th IEEE Intelligent Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (Las Palmas of Gran Canaria, Spain 2010), pp. 231–235Google Scholar
- 7.B. Csanádi, P. Galambos, J. Tar, G. Györök, A. Serester, Revisiting Lyapunov’s technique in the fixed point transformation-based adaptive control, in Proceeding of the 22nd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, 21–23 June 2018, pp. 329–334Google Scholar
- 10.A. Dineva, J. Tar, A. Várkonyi-Kóczy, V. Piuri, Generalization of a sigmoid generated fixed point transformation from SISO to MIMO systems, in Proceeding of the IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES 2015), Bratislava, Slovakia 3–5 September 2015, pp. 135–140Google Scholar
- 11.A. Dineva, Non-conventional data representation and control (PhD Thesis, Supervisors: A.R. Várkonyi-Kóczy & J.K. Tar). Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary (2016)Google Scholar
- 12.H. Redjimi, J. Tar, On the effects of time-delay on precision degradation in fixed point transformation-based adaptive control, in Proceeding of the IEEE 30th Jubilee Neumann Colloquium, Budapest, Hungary, 24–25 Nov 2017, pp. 125–130Google Scholar
- 13.B. Csanádi, P. Galambos, J. Tar, G. Györök, A. Serester, A novel, abstract rotation-based fixed point transformation in adaptive control, in Accepted for Publication at the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC2018), Miyazaki, Japan, 7–10 Oct 2018, pp. 1–6Google Scholar